Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of the Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility of Hungarian Small and Mediumsized Enterprises in the Era of Coronavirus Cover

Analysis of the Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility of Hungarian Small and Mediumsized Enterprises in the Era of Coronavirus

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. AGARWAL, S. – YADAV, Y. S. – ACHARYA, A. 2014. Impact of CSR-Driven Internal Employee Motivation on Cordiality of Employee Relations. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, 2014, pp. 315–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1979-8_2510.1007/978-81-322-1979-8_25
  2. CIFUENTES-FAURA, J. 2021. Circular Economy and Sustainability as a Basis for Economic Recovery Post-COVID-19. In Circular Economy and Sustainability, vol. 2, 2021, pp. 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00065-610.1007/s43615-021-00065-6814469434888561
  3. COHEN, B. – WINN, M. I. 2007. Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. In Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, 2007, no. 1, pp. 29–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.00110.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
  4. EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY. 2020. Air pollution goes down as Europe takes hard measures to combat coronavirus. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from eea.europa.eu: https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/air-pollution-goes-down-as
  5. EWEJE, G. 2015. Emerging Trends in CSR and Sustainability. In Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 24, 2015, no. 7, pp. 601–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.189110.1002/bse.1891
  6. FAROOQ, Q. – HAO, J. – LIU, X. – XIAO, D. – HAO, Y. 2020. Social and environmental development: Fresh concepts and soft measures towards sustainable development. In Sustainable Development, vol. 28, 2020, no. 6, pp. 1796–1803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.207510.1002/sd.2075
  7. GELBMANN, U. 2010. Establishing strategic CSR in SMEs: an Austrian CSR quality seal to substantiate the strategic CSR performance. In Sustainable Development, vol. 18, 2010, no. 2, pp. 90–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.44810.1002/sd.448
  8. GERRANS, P. – HUTCHINSON, B. 2000. Sustainable development and small to mediumsized enterprises: A long way to go. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment: Business Imperatives, 2000, pp. 75–81. ISBN 9781351282840. http://dx.doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.978-1-909493-11-7_710.9774/GLEAF.978-1-909493-11-7_7
  9. GOTO, M. – SUEYOSHI, T. 2020. Sustainable development and corporate social responsibility in Japanese manufacturing companies. In Sustainable Development, vol. 28, 2020, no. 4, pp. 844–856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.203510.1002/sd.2035
  10. GREENFIELD, P. – MUIRURI, P. 2020. Conservation in crisis: ecotourism collapse threatens communities and wildlife. In The Guardian, 2021. Retrieved October 10 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/may/05/conservation-in-crisis-covid-19-coronavirus-ecotourism-collapse-threatens-communities-and-wildlife-aoe
  11. HAI HUNG, D. – THI HANH NGUYEN, N. 2020. Corporate Social Responsibility for Sustainable Development of Small and Medium Enterprises in Vietnam. In Journal of Business and Economic Development, vol. 5, 2020, no. 3, p. 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.1510.11648/j.jbed.20200503.15
  12. HOLMBERG, J. – LUNDQVIST, U. – ROBÈRT, K.-H. 2017. An approach to sustainable product development relevant to small and medium-sized enterprises. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment. 2017. pp. 158–170. ISBN 9781351282840. doi:10.4324/9781351282840-13
  13. HUETING, R. 1990. The Brundtland report. In Ecological Economics, vol. 2, 1990, no. 2, pp. 109–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(90)90002-c10.1016/0921-8009(90)90002-C
  14. HUETING, R. – LEIPERT, C. 1990. Economic growth, national income and the blocked choices for the environment. In The Environmentalist, vol. 10, 1990, no. 1, pp. 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf0223955510.1007/BF02239555
  15. KEREKES, S. 2004. A környezetbarát vállalatirányítás eszközei, Budapest : KJK-KERSZÖV Jogi és Üzleti Kiadó Kft, 2004.
  16. KIM, S. – LEE, H. 2019. The Effect of CSR Fit and CSR Authenticity on the Brand Attitude. In Sustainability, vol. 12, 2019, no. 1, p. 275. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su1201027510.3390/su12010275
  17. LI, B. – FAN, X. – ÁLVAREZ-OTERO, S. – SIAL, M.S. – COMITE, U. – CHERIAN, J. – VASA, L. 2021. CSR and Workplace Autonomy as Enablers of Workplace Innovation in SMEs through Employees: Extending the Boundary Conditions of Self-Determination Theory. In Sustainability, vol. 13, 2021, no. 11, p. 6104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116104
  18. McKENZIE-MOHR, D. – LEE, N. – SCHULTZ, P. – KOTLER, P. 2012. Social Marketing to Protect the Environment: What Works. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/978148334946610.4135/9781483349466
  19. NADERIFAR, M. – GOLI, H. – GHALJAIE, F. 2017. Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research. In Strides in Development of Medical Education, vol. 14, 2017, no. 3.10.5812/sdme.67670
  20. PANAGIOTOPOULOS, I. 2021. Novel CSR & novel coronavirus: corporate social responsibility inside the frame of coronavirus pandemic in Greece. In International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, vol. 6, 2021, no. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00065-710.1186/s40991-021-00065-7
  21. RAHMAN, N. – BLAKE, L. 2021. A review of CSR classification schemes and the operationalization of bolted-on vs. built-in CSR. In Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, vol. 30, 2021, no. 3, pp. 248–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/beer.1234510.1111/beer.12345
  22. ROJEK-NOWOSIELSKA, M. – KUŹMIŃSKI, Ł. 2021. CSR Level Versus Employees’ Attitudes towards the Environment. In Sustainability, vol. 13, 2021, no. 16, p. 9346. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su1316934610.3390/su13169346
  23. SONI, N. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on Business Organization, Industries and Economy. In SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.367567410.2139/ssrn.3675674
  24. STREZOV, V. – EVANS, A. – EVANS, T.J. 2016. Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development. In Sustainable Development, vol. 25, 2016, no. 3, pp. 242–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.164910.1002/sd.1649
  25. WARREN, R. C. 2011. Why we need a theory of CSR. In Economy of Region, 2011, pp. 197–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.17059/2011-1-2610.17059/2011-1-26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2022-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1339-3367 | Journal ISSN: 1338-8339
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 5
Published on: Jul 12, 2022
Published by: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Peter Karácsony, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.