Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sustainability and Control Issues of the Financial Management of Local Governments – Through Hungary’s Example Cover

Sustainability and Control Issues of the Financial Management of Local Governments – Through Hungary’s Example

Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. BURRET, H. T. – FELD, L. P. 2018. Vertical effects of fiscal rules: the Swiss experience. In International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 25, 2018, no. 3, pp. 673–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9467-y10.1007/s10797-017-9467-y
  2. BRYSON, P. J. 2016. User Fees in Local Finance: Performance and Potential in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In P. J. Bryson (Ed.), The Economics of Centralism and Local Autonomy. Fiscal Decentralization in the Czech and Slovak Republics. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, pp. 95–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978023011201810.1057/9780230112018
  3. BRYSON, P. J. – CORNIA, G. C. 2000. Fiscal decentralisation in economic transformation: the Czech and Slovak cases. In Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 52, 2000, no. 3, pp. 507–522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/71366306410.1080/713663064
  4. CSŰRÖS, G. 2014. Changes in Hungarian local government system. In Bódi, F. – Fábián, G. – Fónai, M. – Kurkinen, J. – Lawson, T.R. – Pietiläinen, H. (Eds.). Access to services in rural areas: A comparison of Finland and Hungary. Bremen : Europaeischer Hochschulverlag, 2014, pp. 71–88.
  5. DAFFLON, B. 2010. Local Debt: from Budget Responsibility to Fiscal Discipline. In IEB 6th Symposium on Fiscal Federalism, Barcelona, June 14–15. Retrieved from http://commonweb.unifr.ch/EcoDean/Pub/telecharg/wp/417.pdf
  6. DAVEY, K. – PETERI, G. 1998. Local Government Finances: Options for Reform. Nagykovacsi : Local Government Know-How Programme, 1998.
  7. DUVE, T. – DRESCHSLER, W. 2011. Insolvent local government: German approach prevention. In Central European Public Administration Review, vol. 9, 2011, no. 2, pp. 7–36. Retrieved from http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/17410.17573/cepar.v9i2.174
  8. FÁBIÁN, A. 2017. Local self-government in Hungary: The impact of crisis. In Nunes, S.C. – Buček, J. (Eds.). Local government and urban governance in Europe. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2017, (pp. 71–87). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43979-210.1007/978-3-319-43979-2
  9. FOREMNY, D. 2014. Sub-national deficits in European countries: The impact of fiscal rules and tax autonomy. In European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 34, 2014, pp. 86–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.01.00310.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.01.003
  10. HABÁNIK, J. – KORDOŠ, M. – HOŠTÁK, P. 2016. Competitiveness of Slovak economy and regional development policies. In Journal of International Studies, vol. 9, 2016, no. 1, pp. 144–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/1010.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/10
  11. HEIJDRA, B. J. – MEIJDAM, L. 2002. Public investment and intergenerational distribution. In Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 26, 2002, no. 5, pp. 707–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(00)00074-910.1016/S0165-1889(00)00074-9
  12. KECSKÉS, A. 2016. The European system of responsible corporate governance. In Európai Jog (European Law), vol. 16, 2016, no. 3, pp. 28–38. Retrieved from http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/40411 (in Hungarian)
  13. KECSŐ, G. 2016. Financial legal status of local governments: Models of legal institutions that determine status are on the revenue side. England – USA – Hungary. Budapest : ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, 2016. Retrieved from http://eotvospontok.hu/a-helyionkormanyzatok-penzugyi-jogi-jogallasa (in Hungarian)
  14. LENTNER, Cs. 2014. The Debt Consolidation of Hungarian Local Governments. In Public Finance Quarterly, 2014, no. 3, pp. 310–325. Retrieved from https://www.asz.hu/storage/files/files/public-finance-quarterly-articles/2014/a_lentnercs_2014_3.pdf
  15. LEVAGGI, R. – ZANOLA, R. 2003. Flypaper effect and sluggishness: Evidence from regional health expenditure in Italy. In International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 10, 2003, no. 5, pp. 535–547. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102611822290110.1023/A:1026118222901
  16. MONACELLI, D. – PAZIENZA, M. G. – RAPALLINI, C. 2016. Municipality budget rules and debt: Is the Italian regulation effective? In Public Budgeting and Finance, vol. 36, 2016, no. 3, pp. 114–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.1209410.1111/pbaf.12094
  17. MUSGRAVE, R. A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York : McGrow-Hill, 1959.
  18. NIŽŇANSKÝ, V. – CIBÁKOVÁ, V. – HAMALOVÁ, J. 2014. The third stage of decentralization of public administration in Slovakia. Bratislav a: Wolters Kluwer, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.wolterskluwer.sk/sk/tretia-etapa-decentralizacie-verejnej-spravy-naslovensku.p1906.html (in Slovak)
  19. OTRUSINOVÁ, M. 2016. Public sector accounting in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In Administratie si Management Public, 2016, no. 27, pp. 30–45. Retrieved from http://www.ramp.ase.ro/en/_data/files/articole/2016/27-02.pdf
  20. ROSTA, M. 2012. Correlation Between New Public Management and Zoltán Magyary’s Public Administration Development Programme. In Polgári Szemle (Civic Review), 2012, no. 8, pp. 3–6. Retrieved from https://polgariszemle.hu/archivum/114-2012-december-8-evfolyam-3-6-szam/szemelvenyek-az-allam-es-kozigazgatas-tudomanybol/496-az-uj-koezszolgalati-menedzsment-es-a-magyary-zoltan-koezigazgatas-fejlesztesi-program-viszonyarol (in Hungarian)
  21. TER-MINASSIAN, T. – CRAIGH, J. 1997. Control of subnational government borrowing. In Ter-Minassian, T. (Eds.). Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington : International Monetary Fund, 1997, pp. 156–172.
  22. TORMA, A. 2011. On the European Administrative Space – from a Hungarian perspective. In Miskolci Jogi Szemle (Miskolc Law Review), 2011, 6 (special issue), pp. 196–210. Retrieved from http://midra.uni-miskolc.hu/document/12688/4763.pdf (in Hungarian)
  23. URYSZEK, T. 2015. Sustainable public finance – illusion or reality? Evidence from old EU member states. In Journal of International Studies, vol. 8, 2015, no. 1, pp. 22–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/210.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/2
  24. VAN ROMPUY, P. 2016. Sub-national tax autonomy and deficits: Empirical results for 27 OECD countries. In Regional Studies, vol. 50, 2016, no. 7, pp. 1248–1259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.100793710.1080/00343404.2015.1007937
  25. ZÉMAN, Z. 2017. The risk-mitigating role of financial controlling at local government entities. In Public Finance Quarterly, 2017, no. 3, pp. 294–310. Retrieved from https://www.penzugyiszemle.hu/pfq/upload/pdf/penzugyi_szemle_angol/volume_62_2017_3/zeman_2017_3a.pdf
  26. ZÉMAN, Z. – TÓTH, A. 2015. Performance evaluation of local governments and utilities companies. In Lentner, Cs. (Eds.). Tax Finance and Public Finance: Public Finance II. Budapest : NKE Szolgáltató Kft, 2015, pp. 829–853. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312490088_Adozasi_Penzugytan_es_Allamhaztartasi_Gazdalkodas (in Hungarian)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2019-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1339-3367 | Journal ISSN: 1338-8339
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 26
Published on: Jul 9, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Csaba Lentner, László Nagy, László Vasa, Szilárd Hegedűs, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.