Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Molecular and morphological discrimination of selected plum seedlings for rootstock breeding Cover

Molecular and morphological discrimination of selected plum seedlings for rootstock breeding

Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
Volume 20 (2012): Issue 1 (October 2012)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Oct 2012
References

References

  1. Ayanoglu H., Bayazit S., Inan G., Bakir M., Akpinar A.E., Kazan. K., Ergul A. 2007. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in Turkish green plum accessions (L.) adapted to the Mediterranean region. SCI. HORTIC. 114: 263-267.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Boritzki M., Plieske J., Struss D. 2000. Cultivar identification in sweet cherry (L.) using AFLP and microsatellite markers. ACTA HORTIC. 538: 505-510.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Cai Y.T., Cao D.W., Zhao G.F. 2007. Studies on genetic variation in cherry germplasm using RAPD analysis. SCI. HORTIC. 111: 248-254.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Casas A.M., Igartua1 E., Balaguer G., Moreno M.A. 1999. Genetic diversity ofrootstocks analyzed by RAPD markers. EUPHYTICA 110: 139-149.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Ganji Moghadam A., Mokhtaryan A., Kiani M. 2006. Investigation on Genetic variation of sour cherry (L.) population for selection of dwarf genotypes using morphological characters. J. SEEDLINGS SEED. (In Persian). 22(4): 430-417.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Gerlach H.K., Stosser R. 1998. Sweet cherry cultivar identification using RAPD-derived DNA fine prints. ACTA HORTIC. 468: 63-69.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Gyeviki M., Magyar L., Bujdoso G., Hrotko K. 2008. Cherry rootstock evaluation for high density orchards in Hungary. BULL. USAVM, HORTICULTURE 65(1): 231-236.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Hend B.T., Ghada B., Mustapha Sana B., Mohamed M., Mokhtar T., Salhi-Hannachi A. 2009. Genetic relatedness among Tunisian plum cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and evaluation of phenotypic characters. SCI. HORTIC. 124: 440-446.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Iezzoni A.F., Brettin T.S. 1998. Utilization of molecular genetics in cherry. ACTA HORTIC. 498: 53-62.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Ilgin M., Kafkas S., Ercisli S. 2009. Molecular characterization of plum cultivars by AFLP markers. BIOTECHNOL. BIOTECHNOL. EQ. 23: 1189-1193.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. IPGRI (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources) and CEC (Commission of European Communities), (1984). In: Cobianchi D, Watkins R (eds.), Committee on disease resistance breeding and use of gene banks. Descriptor list for plum and allied species, pp. 31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Janes H., Pae A. 2003. First result of a dwarfing plum rootstock trial. AGRON. RES. 1: 37-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Jannatizadeh A., Fatahi R., Zamani Z., Zeraatgar H. 2011. Investigation of the Genetic Diversity of Apricot Varieties and Cultivars using RAPD Markers and Morphological Traits. IRAN. J. HORTIC. SCI. 42(3): 255-265.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Khadivi-Khub A., Zamani Z., Bouzari N. 2008. Evaluation of genetic diversity in some Iranian and foreign sweet cherry Cultivars by Using RAPD Molecular Markers and Morphological Traits. HORT. ENVIRON. BIOTECH. 49: 188-196.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kumar M., Mishra G.P., Singh R., Kumar J., Naik P.K., Singh S.B. 2009. Correspondence of ISSR and RAPD markers for comparative analysis of genetic diversity among different apricot genotypes from cold arid deserts of trans Himalayas. PHYSIOL MOL. BIOL. PLANTS. 15: 225-236.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Li M.M., Cai Y.L., Qian Z.Q., Zhao G.F. 2009. Genetic diversity and differentiation in Chinese sour cherryLindl., and its implications for conservation. GENET. RES. CROP EVOL. 56: 455-464.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Lisek A., Korbin M., Rozpara E. 2006. Using simply generated RAPD markers to distinguish between sweet cherry (L.) cultivars. J. FRUIT ORNAM PLANT RES. 14: 53-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Lisek A., Rozpara E. 2009. Identification and genetic diversity assessment of cherry cultivars and rootstocks using ISSR-PCR technique. J. FRUIT ORNAM PLANT RES. 17: 95-106.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Lisek A., Korbin M., Rozpara E., Żurawicz E. 2007. Plum cultivar DNA polymorphism generated with RAPD and ISSR markers. ACTA HORTIC. 734: 281-285.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Liu W., Li S., Zhang A., Liu D. 2007. Genetic diversity revealed by RAPD markers in plum collection of China. ACTA HORTIC. 734: 287-294.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Martinez L., Cavagnaro P., Masuelli R. 2003. Evaluation of diversity among Argentine grapevine (L.) varieties using morphological data and AFLP markers. ELEC. BIOTECHNOL. 6 (3): 144-253.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Martins M., Tenreiro R., Oliveira M.M. 2003. Genetic relatedness of Portuguese almond cultivars assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. PLANT CELL REP. 22: 71-78.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Murray H.G., Thompson W.F. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA. NUCLEIC ACIDS RES. 8: 4321-4325.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Ohta S., Katsuki T., Tanaka T., Hayashi T., Sato Y.I., Yamamoto T. 2005. Genetic variation in flowering cherries (subgenus) characterized by SSR markers. BREED SCI. 55: 415-425.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Okie W.R. 1987. Plum Rootstocks. In: Rom RC, Carlson RF (eds). Rootstocks for fruit crops. Wiley. New York. pp. 321-360.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Okie W.R., Hancock J.F. 2008. Plums. In: Hancock J.F. (ed), Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding Germplasm to Genomics. Michigan State University, pp. 337-357.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Okie W.R, Weinberger J.H. 1996. Plums. In: Janick J., Moore J.N. (eds). Fruit Breeding. vol. 1. Tree and tropical fruits. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 559-609.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Papp M., Timon B., Halasz J., Gyorgy Z., Simon G. 2009. Relationship of wild cherries (L. subsp.) in Buda mountains site selected grown sweet cherry cultivars. KERTGAZDASAG HORTIC. 41: 74-84.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Prevost A, .Wilkinson, M.J. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. THEORETIC. APPLIED GENET. 98: 107-112.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Ramming D.W., Cociu V. 1991. Plums In: Moore J.N., Ballington J.R. (eds), Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. ACTA HORT. 290 (1): 233-287.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Reynders-Aloisi S., Grellet E. 1994: Characterization of the ribosomal DNA units in two relatedspecies (and). PLANT CELL REPORTS. 13: 641-646.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Reynders S., Salesses G. 1991. Study on the relationships within the subgenus Prunophora. Restriction maps of the ribosomal genes inand. ACTA HORT. 283: 27-29.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Roh M.S., Cheong E.J., Choi I.Y., Joung Y.H. 2007. Characterization of wildanalyzed by intersimple sequence repeat and chloroplast DNA. SCI. HORTIC. 114: 121-128.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Roholf F.J. 1998. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Salesses G., Grasselly C., Bernhard R. 1994. Utilisation des especes indigenes et exotiques pour l’amelioration descultives, variétéset porte-greffe, C. R. ACAD. AGRIC. FR. 80: 77-88.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Semagn K. 2002. Genetic relationships among ten encoded types as revealed by a combination of morphological, RAPD and AFLP markers. HEREDITAS. 137: 149-156.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Shimada T., Hayama H., Nishimura K., Yamaguchi M., Yoshida M. 2001. The genetic diversities of 4 species of subg. Lithocerasus (, Rosaceae) revealed by RAPD analysis. EUPHYTICA. 117: 85-90.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Shimada T., Hayama H., Haji, T., Yamaguchi M., Yoshida M. 1999. Genetic diversity of plums characterized by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. EUPHYTICA. 109: 143-147.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Struss D., Ahmas R., Southwich S.M. 2003. Analysis of sweet cherry (L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. J. AM. SOC. HORT. SCI. 128: 904-909.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Struss D., Boritzki M., Glozer K., Southwick S.M. 2001. Detection of genetic diversity among population sweet cherry. SCI. HORTIC. 76: 362-367.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Vollmann J., Grausgnxber H., Stiff G., Dryzhynik V., Lelley T. 2005. Genetic diversity in camelina germplasm as revealed by seed quality characteristics and RAPD polymorphism. PLANT BREED. 124: 446-453.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., Rafalski J.A., Tingey S.V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. NUCL. ACIDS RES. 18: 6531-6535.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Wunsch A., Gella R., Hormaza J.I. 2004. Molecular characterization of rootstocks for sweet cherry (L.). ACTA HORTIC. 658: 599-602.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Zamani Z., Sarkhosh A., Fatahi R., Ebadi A. 2007. Genetic relationships among pomegranate genotypes studied by fruit characteristics and RAPD markers. SCI. HORTIC. 82: 11-18.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10290-012-0001-0 | Journal eISSN: 1231-0948
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 5 - 19
Published on: Oct 31, 2012
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
biodiversity characterization,
Prunus domestica,
RAPD markers,
seedling
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Life sciences, other

© 2012 Mehdi Aran, Reza Fatahi, Zabihollah Zamani, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 20 (2012): Issue 1 (October 2012)
Next article