Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Geography and Social Sciences in Transdisciplinary Science Cover

Geography and Social Sciences in Transdisciplinary Science

Open Access
|Aug 2012

References

  1. Ackerman E. A. 1963, Where is a research frontier?, 53 (4), 429-440.
  2. Andersson R., Musterd S., 2003, Area-based policies: a critical appraisal,, 96, 4, s. 377-389.
  3. Aoyma Y., Murphy J. T., Hanson S., 2011,, Sage, London.
  4. Bingham N., Thrift N., 2000. Some new instructions for travelers: the geography of Bruno
  5. Latour and Michel Serres. [in:] Crang M., Thrift N. (ed.)Routledge, London-New York, 281-301.
  6. Blaut J. M., 1962. Object and relationship,, 14, 1-6.
  7. Bourdieu P. 1975, The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason,, 14 (6), 31-47.
  8. Bridge G., Watson S., 2000, City Imaginaries [in:]., Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford 7-18, 7-17.
  9. Brigham A. P., 1915, Problems of geographic influence,, 5, 3-25.
  10. Brown E. H. 1975, The content and relationships of physical geography,, 141, 1, 35-40.
  11. Brzeziński M., Gorynia M., Hockuba Z., 2008, Ekonomia a inne nauki społeczne na początku XXI wieku, Między imperializmem a kooperacją [Economics and other social sciences at the beginning of XXIst century. Between imperialism and cooperation],, 2, 201-232
  12. Burt W. 2005, General / particular, [in:] Castries N., Rogers A., Sherman D., (eds.), Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford, 117-130.
  13. Castells M., 1977,,, E. Arnold, London.
  14. Castree N., 2005, Is geography a science? [in:] Castries N., Rogers A., Sherman D., (eds.), Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford, 57-79.
  15. Chojnicki Z., 2004, Problematyka metodologiczna studiów regionalnych [Metodological problems of regional studies],, 4 (18), 5-11
  16. Chojnicki Z., 1996, Region w ujęciu geograficzno-systemowym [Region in geographic-systemic approach] [in:] Czyż T. (ed.),, Bogucki Wyd. Naukowe, Poznań, 7-44.
  17. Chojnicki Z., 1988, Basic philosophical and methodological problems of space and time,3 (1988), 9-23).
  18. Chojnicki Z., 1973, Założenia i perspektywy rozwoju geografii ekonomicznej [Assumptions and perspectives of of economic geography development],, 45, 1, 3-27.
  19. Coe N. M., Kelly P. F., Yeung H. W. C. 2007,, Blackwell Publishing, Malden.
  20. Czwarno M., 2003, Homo oeconomicus kontra homo sociologicus, czyli dlaczego ekonomiści nie lubią socjologów, a socjologowie nie przepadają za ekonomistami, [Homo economicus vs. homo sociologicus, that is why economists do not like sociologists, and sociologists are not fond of economists], 3 (170), 113-135.
  21. David P. A. 2001, Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘Historical Economics’ [in:] Garrouste P., Ioannides S. (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 15-40.
  22. Del Casino J. V. 2009,, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell.
  23. Dogan M., 1996, The hybridization of social science knowledge - Navigating among the disciplines: The library and interdisciplinary inquiry,, 45, 2, 296-314.
  24. Dogan M., Pahre R., 1989, Fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences,, summer, 24, 2, 56-73.
  25. Domański H., 2006, Niektóre zagrożenia profesjonalizacji [Some hazards of professionalisation] [in:], Wydawnictwo Instytut Badań Literackich PAN, Warszawa, 46-51.
  26. Dominiak Ł. M., 2006, Strategie interdyscyplinarności w perspektywie naukoznawczej [Strategies of interdisciplinarity in scientific perspective], [in:] Kowalewski J., Piasek W., Śliwa M. (eds.), Colloquia Humaniorium, Olsztyn, 47-60
  27. Dybiec J., 1993,[ Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences 1872-1952] Secesja, Kraków.
  28. Elster J., 2010, One social science or many? {in:], Knowledge Divides, UNESCO Publishing, International Social Science Council, Paris, 199-203.
  29. Fenneman N. M., 1919, The circumference of geography,, 9, 3-11.
  30. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M., 1994,, Sage Publications, London.
  31. Giddens A., 1991,, Polity Press, Blackwell Publishers, London.
  32. Golledge R. G. Stimson R. J., 1997,, Guilford Press, New York- London.
  33. Grobler A., 2006,[Methodology of science], Aureus-Znak, Kraków.
  34. Hamnett C. 2003, Contemporary geography: fiddling while Rome burns,34, 1-3.
  35. Hardt M., Negri A., 2000,, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
  36. Hartshorne R., 1959,, AAAG/ Rand McNally, Chicago.
  37. Harvey D., 2009, Reshaping economic geography: The World Development Report 2009,40, 6, 1269-1277.
  38. Harvey D., 1969,, Edward Arnold, London.
  39. Isačenko A. G., 1975,, [A history of geographical thought] PWN, Warszawa.
  40. Jackowski A., Sołjan I., 2009,) [The history of geography at Jagiellonian University (XV-XXI century)], Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.
  41. Jahn A., 1990, Podsumowanie i komentarz [Czym była i jest polska geografia] [What was and is Polish geography],3-4, 180-186.
  42. James P. E., Martin G. J., 1981,, J. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
  43. Johnston R., 2003,"Transactions, Institute of British Geographers NS", 28, 133-141.
  44. Johnston R. 2002, Reflection on Nigel Thrift's optimism: political strategies to implement his vision,33, 421-425.
  45. Johnston R. J., 1997,, Blackwell, London-New York-Sydney-Auckland.
  46. Kamiński S. 1981,, [The concept of science and classification of sciences], Rozprawy Wydziału Filozoficznego. Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, Lublin.
  47. Kitchen R., Blades M., 2001,, I. B. Tauris, London.
  48. Kuijper H., 2008, Area Studies versus Disciplines: Towards an Interdisplinary, Systemic Country Approach,, 3, 7, 205-216.
  49. Laponce J. A., 1980, Political Science: An Import-Export Analysis of Journals and Footnotes,, 401-419.
  50. Lefebvre H., 1991,, Blackwell, Oxford-Cambridge MA.
  51. Lopreato J., Crippen T., 1999,, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick NJ.
  52. Kaltenberg-Kwiatkowska E., 2007, Socjologia przestrzeni w Polsce. Narodziny subdyscypliny [Sociology of space in Poland. Birth of a subdiscipline] [in:] Borowik I., Sztalta K., (eds.), Wyd. Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław, 9-24.
  53. Kates R. W., 2002, Humboldt's dream, beyond disciplines, and sustainability science: contested identities in restructuring Academy,, 92 (1), 79-81.
  54. Kaufmann A., Kasztler A., 2009, Differences in publication and dessemination practices between disciplinary and transdisciplinary science and the consequences for research evaluation,, 36 93), April, 215-227.
  55. Kotarbiński T., 1961., [ Elements of the theory of knowledge, formal logic and methodology of science], Ossolineum, Wrocław.
  56. Krajewski W., 1982.[The laws of science. Review of methodological and philosophical issues], PWN, Warszawa.
  57. Kula M. 2010, Przyszłość historyków [The future of historians],5(49), 12-13.
  58. Lisowski A., 2009, Jakie "studia regionalne" mogą podnieść prestiż geografii [What regional studies can raise the prestige of geography?], [in:] Richling A., Lechowicz M., (eds.), KNG PAN, WGSR UW, Warszawa, 23-38.
  59. Lisowski A., 2006, Przedmiot badań, funkcje i tożsamość geografii na początku XXI wieku [The subject of research, functions and identity of geography at the beginning of the twentyfirst century] [in:] Maik W., Rembowska K., Suliborski A. (eds.); Podstawowe idee i koncepcje w geografii T. 3, Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki, Bydgoszcz 2007, 39-54.
  60. Lisowski A. 2004, Geografia społeczno-ekonomiczna a nauki społeczne [Socio-economic geography and social sciences] [in:] Chojnicki Z. (ed.), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 2004, 67-80.
  61. Lisowski A., 2003,, [The concepts of space in human geography], WGSR Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa.
  62. Lisowski A., 1996. Tendencje dezintegracyjne i integracyjne we współczesnej geografii czło wieka [Disintegrative and integrative tendencies in contemporary human geography]68, 3-4, 317-333.
  63. Maik W., 2004, Główne płaszczyzny relacji między geografią fizyczną a geografią społecznoekonomiczną [The main planes of the relationships between physical geography and socio-economic geography [in:] Chojnicki Z. (ed.), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 2004, 9-24.
  64. Martin R., 1999, The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: some critical reflections,, 23, 65-91.
  65. Melezin A., 1985, Wiktor Ormicki w Wilnie [Wiktor Ormicki in Vilnius], 55, 3-4, 433-434.
  66. Morillo F., Bordons M., Gomez I. 2003, Interdisciplinarity in Science: A Tentative Typology of Disciplines and Reserch Areas,, 54 (13) 1237-1249.
  67. Mulligan G. F., 2003, What's wrong with economic geography? Other thoughts on the rift,, XVI, 1, 33-37.
  68. Nowakowski S. 1934-35, Geografja jako nauka i dzieje odkryć geograficznych, [Geography as a science and history of geographical discoveries], T.1. Trzaska, Evert i Michalski, Warszawa.
  69. Passen van C., 1957,, JB Wolters, Groningen.
  70. Ratajczak M., 2009, Economics in the Age of Crisis: between Anti-Economics and Economic Triumphalism, [in:] Kopycińska D. (ed.),, University of Sczecin, Microeconomics Department, Szczecin, 22-31.
  71. Rigg J., Bebbington A., Gough K. V., Bryceson D. F., Agergaard J., Fold N., Tacoli C., 2009, The World Development Report 2009 ‘reshapes economic geography’: geographical reflections,, 34, 128-136.
  72. Sawicki L. 1932,, [An outline of the overall geography of the Polish lands], Kraków.
  73. Scott A., 2009, World Development Report 2009; reshaping economic geography,, 9, 583-586.
  74. Smith N., 1987, "Academic war over the field of geography": the elimination of geography at Harvard, 1947-1951,, 77 (2) 155-172.
  75. Soja E. W., 1989., Verso, London
  76. Such 1987, Klasyfikacja nauki [Classification of science] [in:] Cackowski Z., Kmita J., Szaniawski K., Smoczyński P. J. (eds), PWN, Warszawa, 297-305.
  77. Such J., Szcześniak M., 1999,, [Philosophy of science]. Wyd. UAM, Poznań.
  78. Sztompka P., 2002,, [Sociology. Analysis of society], Znak, Kraków.
  79. Tatarkiewicz W., 1945, Nauki nomologiczne i typologiczne [Nomothetic science, and typological], t 46, nr 15.
  80. Thrift N. 2002, The future of geography,33, 291-298.
  81. Turner B. L. II, 2002, Contested Identities: Human environment geography and disciplinary implications in a restructuring Academy,, 91, (1) 52-74.
  82. Valentine G. 2000,, Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow.
  83. Viles H., 2005, A divide discipline? [in:] Castries N., Rogers A., Sherman D., (eds.), Blackwell Publishing, Malden-Oxford, 26-38.
  84. Wagner H., 1880, Bericht über die Entwicklung der Methodik der Geographie als Wissenschaft,, 8, 523-598.
  85. Wallerstein I. 1996,, Stanford.
  86. Wallis A., 1971,, [Sociology and shaping of space], PIW, Warszawa.
  87. Werlen B., 1993,Routledge, London-New York.
  88. , Knowledge Divides, UNESCO Publishing, International Social Science Council, Paris.
  89. Zaborski B., Wrzosek A. 1939,[Anthropogeography], Trzaska, Evert, Michalski, Warszawa.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10288-012-0001-x | Journal eISSN: 2084-6118 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6046 (formerly 2084-6118)
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 40
Published on: Aug 13, 2012
Published by: Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Andrzej Lisowski, published by Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.