Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Characteristic of the Czech Countryside Development Based on Local Population Activities and Attitudes Cover

Characteristic of the Czech Countryside Development Based on Local Population Activities and Attitudes

Journal of Landscape Ecology
Volume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (November 2012)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Nov 2012
References

References

  1. Bryden, J., et al. (2001). Differential Economic Performance in Rural Areas. In. University of Aberdeen, Kings College: The Arkleton Centre for Rural Development Research.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Cloke, P. J. (1977). An index of rurality for England and Wales.pp. 31-46. DOI: 10.1080/09595237700185041.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Coffé, H. & Geys, B. (2006). Community Heterogeneity: A Burden for the Creation of Social Capital?, pp. 1053-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00415.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Everitt, B. S., G., D. (2001).. Bristol: Edward Arnold a member of the Hodder Headline Group.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Green, R. J. (1971).. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 071900455I.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Healey, M. J. & Ilbery, B. W. (1985).. Norwich: Geo Books. ISBN 0860942023.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Huigen, P. & Volkers, C. R. (1989). Changes in rural areas in the Netherlands. In van Oort, G. M. R. A. et al. (Eds.),(pp. 32-34), Amsterdam: Pudoc. Wageningen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Iravani, M. R. (2010). Role of Social Capital on Development., pp. 966-978.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Karadag, M. (2009). On cultural capital and taste.pp. 531-551. DOI: 10.1080/14616690802317862
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Maříková, P. & Majerová, V. (2005).. Retrieved 20.5.2012 from http://www.vuze.cz/CZ /Main/EAFRD/Devel/Vymezeni venkova.doc
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Lapka, M. & Gottlieb, M. (2000).. Kapitoly ze života soukromých rolníků. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství. pp. 166. ISBN 8085850834.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Perlín, R. (1998). Venkov, typologie venkovského prostoru. Retrieved 25.5.2012 from http://www.mvcr.cz/ odbor/reforma/perlin.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Perlín, R., Kučerová, S. & Kučera, Z. (2010). Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka.pp. 161-187.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.pp. 1-24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1994).. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Seoyong, K. & Hyesun K. (2009). Does Cultural Capital Matter?: Cultural Divide and Quality of Life.pp. 295-313. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-008-9318-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2010). Cultural capital: strengths, weaknesses and two advancements.pp. 157-169. DOI: 10.1080/01425690903539065.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Xu, L. & Song, S. (2011). Study on Construction of Cultural Capital among Entrepreneurs.pp. 203-206. ISSN 1911-2017.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0053-9 | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427 (formerly 1805-4196)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 54 - 71
Published on: Nov 23, 2012
Published by: Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Rural development,
local population,
cultural and social capital,
rural area,
villages,
municipality
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other

© 2012 Eva Cudlínová, Ivana Faltová Leitmanová, Renata Klufová, Ladislav Rolínek, Milan Jílek, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (November 2012)
Previous article
Next article