Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: on the Politics of Sustainability in the U.S. Cover

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: on the Politics of Sustainability in the U.S.

By:   
Open Access
|Nov 2012

References

  1. Bryant, R.L. (1991). Putting politics first: the political ecology of sustainable development., 1 (6): pp. 164-166.
  2. Costanza, R. (2009). Toward a new sustainable economy., 49: pp. 20-21.
  3. Daly H.E. (1990). Toward some operational principles of sustainable development., 2: pp. 1-6.
  4. Dernbach, J.C. (2012). Sustaining America.pp. 12-10. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2049853 (Accessed June, 2012).
  5. Ewing B., Moore, D., Goldfinger, S., Oursler A., Reed A. and Wackernagel, M. (2010).. Global Footprint Network. Oakland, CA.
  6. Hollender, J., Alperovitz, G., Asquith, C., Becker, B., Costanza, R., Hoffman, E., Kahler, E., Levine, D., Lovins, H and Rapaport D. (2010). Creating a game plan for the transition to a sustainable U.S. economy.pp. 36-41.
  7. Hopwood, B., Meloor, M. and O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches.pp. 38-52.
  8. Ipsos Mori. (2011).. Available from http://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/sri-environment-global-advisor-april-2011-presentation-slidepack.pdf (Accessed June, 2012).
  9. Lukes, S. (1974).. Basingstoke, London.
  10. McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims.pp. 499-522.
  11. McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American Conservative movement's success in undermining climate science and policy.: pp. 100-133.
  12. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement: a summary. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinarypp. 95-100.
  13. Naess, A. (1984). A defense of the deep ecology movement.: pp. 265-270.
  14. Paehlke, R. (1999). Towards defining, measuring and achieving sustainability: tools and strategies for environmental evaluation," In Becker, E. and Jahn, T. (eds):(pp. 243-63). UNESCO and Zed Books, London Parris, T.M. and Kates, R.W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development.28: 559-586.
  15. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (2010).. Available from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1780/poll-global-warming-scientistsenergy-policies-offshore-drilling-tea-party (Accessed June, 2012).
  16. Redclift, M.R. (1993). Development and the environment: Managing the contradictions? Innovation.pp. 443-456.
  17. Rees, W.E. (1990). The ecology of sustainable development.pp. 18-23.
  18. Rees, W.E. (1997). Ecological footprints and the imperative of rural sustainability. In Audirac, C. (ed):(pp. 41-77). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  19. Rikoon, J.S. (2004). On the politics of the politics of origins: Social (in)justice and the international agenda on intellectual property, traditional knowledge, and folklore.: pp. 325-336.
  20. Rikoon, J.S. and Goedeke, T.G. (2000).. Mellon, Ceredigion, UK and New York.
  21. Sibaud, P. (2012).. Gaia Foundation, San Francisco.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0051-y | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427 (formerly 1805-4196)
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 36
Published on: Nov 23, 2012
Published by: Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Sandy Rikoon, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.