Have a personal or library account? Click to login
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: on the Politics of Sustainability in the U.S. Cover

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: on the Politics of Sustainability in the U.S.

By: Sandy Rikoon  
Open Access
|Nov 2012

References

  1. Bryant, R.L. (1991). Putting politics first: the political ecology of sustainable development. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 1 (6): pp. 164-166.
  2. Costanza, R. (2009). Toward a new sustainable economy. Real-world Economics Review, 49: pp. 20-21.
  3. Daly H.E. (1990). Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2: pp. 1-6.10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-R
  4. Dernbach, J.C. (2012). Sustaining America. Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. pp. 12-10. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2049853 (Accessed June, 2012).10.2139/ssrn.2049853(2012)
  5. Ewing B., Moore, D., Goldfinger, S., Oursler A., Reed A. and Wackernagel, M. (2010). The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2010. Global Footprint Network. Oakland, CA.
  6. Hollender, J., Alperovitz, G., Asquith, C., Becker, B., Costanza, R., Hoffman, E., Kahler, E., Levine, D., Lovins, H and Rapaport D. (2010). Creating a game plan for the transition to a sustainable U.S. economy. Solutions. 1(3): pp. 36-41.
  7. Hopwood, B., Meloor, M. and O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development (13): pp. 38-52.10.1002/sd.244
  8. Ipsos Mori. (2011). Key environmental concerns by nation. Available from http://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/sri-environment-global-advisor-april-2011-presentation-slidepack.pdf (Accessed June, 2012).
  9. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke, London.10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9
  10. McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems 47 (4): pp. 499-522.
  11. McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American Conservative movement's success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture, and Society, 27(2-3): pp. 100-133.
  12. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement: a summary. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 16: pp. 95-100.
  13. Naess, A. (1984). A defense of the deep ecology movement. Environmental Ethics, 6: pp. 265-270.10.5840/enviroethics19846330
  14. Paehlke, R. (1999). Towards defining, measuring and achieving sustainability: tools and strategies for environmental evaluation," In Becker, E. and Jahn, T. (eds): Sustainability and the Social Sciences (pp. 243-63). UNESCO and Zed Books, London Parris, T.M. and Kates, R.W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 28: 559-586.
  15. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (2010). Wide Partisan Divide Over Global Warming. Available from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1780/poll-global-warming-scientistsenergy-policies-offshore-drilling-tea-party (Accessed June, 2012).
  16. Redclift, M.R. (1993). Development and the environment: Managing the contradictions? Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 6 (4): pp. 443-456.10.1080/13511610.1993.9968371
  17. Rees, W.E. (1990). The ecology of sustainable development. Ecologist, 20 (l): pp. 18-23.
  18. Rees, W.E. (1997). Ecological footprints and the imperative of rural sustainability. In Audirac, C. (ed): Rural Sustainable Development in America (pp. 41-77). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  19. Rikoon, J.S. (2004). On the politics of the politics of origins: Social (in)justice and the international agenda on intellectual property, traditional knowledge, and folklore. The Journal of American Folklore, 117: pp. 325-336.10.1353/jaf.2004.0081
  20. Rikoon, J.S. and Goedeke, T.G. (2000). Anti-environmentalism and Citizen Opposition to the Ozark Man and the Biosphere Reserve. Mellon, Ceredigion, UK and New York.
  21. Sibaud, P. (2012). Opening Pandora's Box - A New Wave of Land Grabbing for the Extractive Industries and The Devastating Impact on Earth. Gaia Foundation, San Francisco.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0051-y | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 36
Published on: Nov 23, 2012
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2012 Sandy Rikoon, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.