Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Structural Versus Functional Habitat Connectivity Measures to Explain Bird Diversity in Fragmented Orchards Cover

Structural Versus Functional Habitat Connectivity Measures to Explain Bird Diversity in Fragmented Orchards

Journal of Landscape Ecology
Volume 3 (2010): Issue 1 (June 2010)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Aug 2012
References

References

  1. Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulink, H. & Matthysen, E. (2003). The application of least-cost modelling as a functional landscape model., 64: 233-247.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Awade, M., Metzger, J. P. (2008). Using gap-crossing capacity to evaluate functional connectivity of two Atlantic rainforest birds and their response to fragmentation., 33: 863-871.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, D., Billeter, R., Aviron, S., Schweiger, O. & Herzog, F. (2007). The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes., 22: 461-473.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, D., Schmidt-Entling, M. H., Eberhardt, P., Herrmann, J., Hofer, G., Kormann, U. & Herzog, F. (2010). Effects of habitat amount and isolation on biodiversity in fragmented traditional orchards.(in press).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Baskent, E. Z., Jordan, G. A. (1995). Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes., 25: 1830-1849.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A. (2002). Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: An empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models., 17: 219-231.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, A. F., Hinsley, S. A., Bellamy, P. E., Swetnam, R. D. & Mac Nally, R. (2004). Do regional gradients in land-use influence richness, composition and turnover of bird assemblages in small woods?, 119: 191-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Billeter, R., Liira, J., Bailey, D., Bugter, R., Arens, P., Augenstein, I., Aviron, S., Baudry, J., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., Cerny, M., De Blust, G., De Cock, R., Diekötter, T., Dietz, H., Dirksen, J., Dormann, C., Durka, W., Frenzel, M., Hamersky, R., Hendricky, F., Herzog, F., Klotz, S., Koolstra, B., Lausch, A., Le Coeur, D., Maelfait, J. P., Opdam, P., Roubalova, M., Schermann, A., Schermann, N., Schmidt, T., Schweiger, O., Smulders, M. J. M., Speelmans, M., Simova, P., Verboom, J., Van Wingerden, W. K. R. E., Zobel, M. & Edwards, P. J. (2008). Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. A pan-European study.45: 141-150.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Böhning-Gaese, K., González-Guzmán & Brown, H. J. (1998). Constraints on dispersal and the evolution of the avifauna of the Northern Hemisphere., 12: 767-783.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Broquet, T., Ray, N., Petit, E., Fryxell, J. M. & Burel, F. (2006). Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana)., 21: 877-889.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Bunn, A. G., Urban, D. L. & Keitt, T. H. (2000). Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory., 59: 265-278.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Calabrese, J. M., Fagan, W. F. (2004). A comparison-shoppers's guide to connectivity metrics., 2(10): 529-536.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Chardon, J. P., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003). Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure. A case study for the Speckled wood butterfly, 18: 561-573.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Desrochers, A., Hannon, S. J. (1997). Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period., 11: 1204-1210.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Driezen, K., Adriaensen, F., Rondinini, C., Doncaster, P. & Matthysen, E. (2007). Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs, 209: 314-322.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Ewers, R. M., Didham, R. K. (2006). Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation., 81: 687-699.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Forman, R. T. T., Godron, M. (1986)., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Gillies, C. S., Clair, C. C. S. (2008). Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest., Volume: 105, Issue: 50, pp. 19774-19779.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N. (1997).Band 11-14, Passeriformes. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Goodwin, B. J. (2003). Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable?, 18: 687-699.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Goodwin, B. J., Fahrig, L. (2002). How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity., 99: 552-570.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Greegan, H. P., Osborne, P. E. (2005). Gap-crossing decisions of woodland songbirds in Scottland: an experimental approach., 42: 678-687.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Haas, C. A. (1995). Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape., 9: 845-854.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Herzog, F., Dreier, S., Hofer, G., Marfurt, C., Schüpbach, B., Spiess, M. & Walter, T. (2005). Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes., 108: 189-204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Keitt, T. H., Urban, D. L. & Milne, B. T. (1997). Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes.(1/1). Retrieved May 2009, from http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4/
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Kindlmann, P., Burel, F. (2008). Connectivity measures. A review., 23: 879-890.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Kleijn, D., Baquero, R. A., Clough, Y., Díaz, M., De Esteban, J., Fernández, F., Gabriel, D., Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Jöhl, R., Knop, E., Kruess, A., Marhsall, E. J. P., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., Verhulst, J., West, T. M. & Yela, J. L. (2006). Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries., 9: 243-254.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Mac Nally, R., Horrocks, G. (2000). Landscape-scale conservation of an endangered migrant: the Swift Parrotin its winter range., 92: 335-343.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Magle, S. B., Theobald, D. M. & Crooks, K. R. (2009). A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA., 24: 267-280.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Matthysen, E., Adriaensen, F. & Dhondt, A. A. (2001). Local recruitment of great and blue tits () in relation to study plot size and degree of isolation., 24: 33-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Pope, S. E., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, H. G. (2000). Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations., 81: 2498-2508.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team (2006).R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved 2009-10-15, from
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Radford, J. Q., Bennett, A. F. (2007). The relative importance of landscape properties for woodland birds in agricultural environments., 44: 737-747.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Radford, J. Q., Bennett, A. F. & Cheers, G. J. (2005). Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds., 124: 317-337.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, M. H., Thies, C., Nentwig, W. & Tscharntke, T. (2008). Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales., 35: 157-166.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Schneider, C., Fry, G. (2005). Estimating the consequences of land-use changes on butterfly diversity in a marginal agricultural landscape in Sweden., 13: 247-256.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Schweiger, O., Maelfait, J. P., van Wingerden, W., Hendrickx, F, Billeter, R., Speelmans, M., Augenstein, I., Aukema, B.; Aviron, S., Bailey, D., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., Diekötter, T., Dirksen, J., Frenzel, M., Herzog, F., Liira, J., Roubalova, M. & Bugter R. (2005). Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organisational levels and spatial scales., 42: 1129-1139.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Stevens, V. M., Verkenne, C., Vandewoestijne, S., Wesselingh, R. A. & Baguette, M. (2006). Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad., 15: 2333-2344.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. & Merriam, G. (1993). Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure., 68: 571-573.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L. & With, K. A. (2006). Landscape connectivity. A return to the basics., 14: 29-43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Tischendorf, L., Fahrig, L. (2000a). How should we measure landscape connectivity?, 15: 633-641.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Tischendorf, L., Fahrig, L. (2000b). On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity., 90: 7-19.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D. (2002).Springer, New York.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Verbeylen, G., De Bruyn, L., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003). Does matrix resistance influence red squirrelL. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape?, 18: 791-805.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Ward, M. P. (2005). The role of immigration in the decline of an isolated migratory bird population., 19: 1528-1536.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Wiens, J. A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology., 3: 385-397.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Wiens, J. A., Van Horne, B. & Noon, B. R. (2002). Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management. In: Liu, J., Taylor, W. W. (Eds.):pp. 23-67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. With, K. A. (2004). Metapopulation dynamics: perspectives from landscape ecology. In: Hanski, I., Gaggiotti, O. (Eds.):pp. 23-44. Academic Press, San Diego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Wu, J., Shen, W., Sun, W. & Tueller, P. T. (2002). Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics., 17: 761-782.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Zwygart, D. (1983). Die Vogelwelt von Nieder- und Hochstammobstkulturen des Kantons Thurgau., 80: 89-104.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0023-2 | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427 (formerly 1805-4196)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 52 - 64
Published on: Aug 8, 2012
Published by: Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Biodiversity,
birds,
cost distance analysis,
fragmentation,
landscape metrics,
spatial scale
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other

© 2012 Susanne Mühlner, Urs Kormann, Martin Schmidt-Entling, Felix Herzog, Debra Bailey, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2010): Issue 1 (June 2010)
Previous article
Next article