References
- 1. Cox NH. A literally blinded trial of palpation in dermatology diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:949-51.
- 2. Boulos KM. Map of dermatology: web image browser for differential diagnosis in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72(1):72-4.
- 3. Janković A. Possibilities of teledermatology in marking clinical, dermoscopic and histologic diagnosis [dissertation]. Niš (Serbia): Medicinski fakultet; 2007.
- 4. Wallach D, Coste J, Tilles G, Taieb. The first images of atopic dermatitis: an attempt at retrospective diagnosis in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;53:684-9.
- 5. Sellheyer K, Bergfeld WE. A retrospective biopsy study of the clinical diagnostic accuracy of common skin diseases by different specialities compared with dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;52:823-30.
- 6. Whited JD, Hall RP. Diagnostic accuracy and precision in assessing dermatologic diseases. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133:1409-15.
- 7. Chang CL, Chen CH. Applying decision tree and neural network to increase quality of dermatologic diagnosis. Expert System Applications 2009;36(2 Pt 2):4035-41.
- 8. Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Brooks LR. Coordination of analytic and similarity-based processing strategies and expertise in dermatological diagnosis. Teach Learn Dermatol 2001;13(2):110-6.
- 9. Tran H, Chen K, Lim AC, Jabbour J, Shumack S. Assessing diagnostic skill in dermatology: A comparison between general practitioners and dermatologists. Aust J Dermatol 2005;46:230-4.
- 10. Osborne FE, Chave TA, Hutchinson PE. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for cutaneous malignant melanoma between general dermatology, plastic surgery and pigmented lesion clinics. Br J Dermatol 2003;148;252-8.
- 11. Boldrick JC, Layton CJ, Nguyen J, Swetter S. Evaluation of digital dermoscopy in a pigmented lesion clinic: clinician versus computer assessment of malignancy risk. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:417-21.
- 12. Jagou M, Bastuji-Garin S, Bourdon-Lanoy E, Penso-Assathiany D, Roujeau JC. Poor agreement between self-reported and dermatologist’s diagnosis for five common dermatoses. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:1006-12.
- 13. Roger France FH. Case mix use in 25 countries: a migration success but international comparisons failure. Int J Med Inf 2003;70:215-9.
- 14. Hensen P, Furstenberg T, Luger TA, Steinhoff M, Roeder N. Case mix measures and diagnosis-related groups: opportunities and threats for inpatient dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005;19:582-8.