Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cognitive Architectures and Autonomy: A Comparative Review Cover

Cognitive Architectures and Autonomy: A Comparative Review

Journal of Artificial General Intelligence
Volume 3 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2012
References

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. 1996. ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition.. 51: 355-365.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., Matessa, M., Lebiere, C. 1997. ACT-R: A theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention.. 12: 439-462.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R., Lebiere, C. 2003. The Newell test for a theory of cognition.. 26: 587-601.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R., John, B. E., Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1995). Production system models of complex cognition.Society, 9-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Baars, B. J. 1988. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Baars, B. J., Franklin, S. 2009. Consciousness is computational: The LIDA model of Global Workspace Theory. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 2009. 1(1): p. 23-32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, R. A. 1991. Intelligence without representation.. 47 (1-3): 139-159.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Joanna J. Bryson (2003). Behavior-Oriented Design of Modular Agent Intelligence. In R. Kowalszyk, J. P. Müller, H. Tianfield and R. Unland (eds.),, pp. 61-76.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Dean, T., and Boddy, M. 1988. An analysis of time- dependent planning. In, 49-54. Saint Paul, MN. AAAI, AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, S. 2006. The LIDA architecture: Adding new modes of learning to an intelligent, autonomous software agent. In, PAGE NUMBERS: San Diego, CA. Society for Design and Process Science.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Garlan, D. & J. Ockerbloom 1995. Architectural Mismatch or Why it's Hard to Build Systems out of Existing Parts. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Software Engineering, Seattle WA, April
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Hall, J. S. 2008. VARIAC: An Autogenous Cognitive Architecture. In, 176-187. Memphis, Tenn.: ISO Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Huang, H., Messina, E., Albus, J. 2003. Towards a Generic Model for Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS). In, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Intelligent Systems Division.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Huang, H., Pavek, K., Novak, B., Albus, J., Messina, E. 2005. A Framework For Autonomy Levels For Unmanned Systems (ALFUS). In, p. 849-863. Baltimore, MD: NIST.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Huang, H., Messina, E., Albus, J. 2004. Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) Framework, Volume II: Framework Models Version 1.0. NIST Special Publication 1011-II-1.0, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Johnston, B. 2010. The Toy Box Problem (and a Preliminary Solution). In, p. 43-48. Lugano, Switzerland: Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Jonsdottir, G. R., Thórisson, K. R, Nivel, E. 2008. Learning Smooth, Human-Like Turntaking in Realtime Dialogue. In, p. 162-175. Tokyo, Japan: Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Kurzweil, R. 2006.New York, NY: Viking Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Laird, J. E. (2008). Extending the Soar Cognitive Architecture. In. Memphis, Tenn.: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Langley, P. 2005. An Adaptive Architecture for Physical Agents. In, 18-25. Compiegne, France: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Langley, P., Laird, J. E., Rogers, S. 2009. Cognitive Architectures: Research Issues and Challenges., 10(2), 141-160.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Ng-Thow-Hing, V., K. R. Thórisson, R. K. Sarvadevabhatla, J. Wormer & T. List. 2009. Cognitive Map Architecture: Facilitation of Human-Robot Interaction in Humanoid Robots.. 16(1): 55-66.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Nivel, E. 2007. Ikon Flux 2.0., Technical Report, RUTR - CS07006, School of Computer Science, Reykjavik Univer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Pezzulo, G., Calvi, G. 2006. A Schema Based Model of the Praying Mantis. In From Animals to Animats 9. In, 211-223. Rome, Italy: Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Pezzulo, G., Calvi, G. 2007. Designing Modular Architectures in the Framework AKIRA.. 3: 65-86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Pezzulo, G. 2009. DiPRA: A Layered Agent Architecture which Integrates Practical Reasoning and Sensorimotor Schemas.. 21: 297-326.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Pollock, J. L. 2008. OSCAR: An Architecture for Generally Intelligent Agents., p. 275-286.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Rao, A. S. and M. P. Georgeff. 1995. BDI-agents: From Theory to Practice., 312-319.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Roy, D. 2005. Semiotic Schemas: A Framework for Grounding Language in the Action and Perception.,(1-2): 170-205.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Samsonovich, A. V. 2010. Toward a Unified Catalog of Implemented Cognitive Architectures. In A. V. Samsonovich, K. R. Jóhannsdóttir, A. Chella & B. Goertzel (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2010 Conference on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures (pp. 195-244). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Snaider, J., McCall, R., Franklin S. 2011. The LIDA framework as a general tool for AGI. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on, p. 133-142.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Sun, R. 2006. The CLARION cognitive architecture: Extending cognitive modeling to social simulation. In: Ron Sun (ed.),. Cambridge University Press, New York.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Sun, R., Merrill, E., Peterson T. 2001. From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: A bottom-up model of skill learning.. 25: 203-244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Sun, R. 2003. A Detailed Specification of CLARION 5.0. Technical report. 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Thórisson, K. R. 1997. Gandalf: An Embodied Humanoid Capable of Real-Time Multimodal Dialogue. In, 536-537. Marina del Rey, Calif.: ACM International Conference on Autonomous Agents.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Thórisson, K. R. 1999. A Mind Model for Multimodal Communicative Creatures and Humanoids.. 13:(4-5): 519-538.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Thórisson, K. R., Benko, H., Abramov D., Arnold, A., Maskey, S., Vaseekaran A. 2004. Constructionist Design Methodology for Interactive Intelligences.. 25(4): 77-90.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Thórisson, K. R. 2009. From Constructionist to Constructivist A. I. Keynote, Technical Report, FS-09-01, AAAI press, Menlo Park, Calif.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Wang, P. 1995.. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Computer Science, Indiana Univ., CITY, Indiana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Wang, P. 1996. Problem-solving under insufficient resources. In Working Notes of the, 148-155. Cambridge, Mass.: AAAI Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Wang, P. 2006.. New York, NY: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10229-011-0015-3 | Journal eISSN: 1946-0163
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 30
Published on: May 21, 2012
Published by: Artificial General Intelligence Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
cognitive architectures,
autonomy,
constructivist AI,
realtime,
meta-learning
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence

© 2012 Kristinn Thórisson, Helgi Helgasson, published by Artificial General Intelligence Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
Next article