Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is Logic in the Mind or in the World? Why a Philosophical Question can Affect the Understanding of Intelligence Cover

Is Logic in the Mind or in the World? Why a Philosophical Question can Affect the Understanding of Intelligence

Journal of Artificial General Intelligence
Volume 3 (2012): Issue 1 (May 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2012
References

References

  1. Ayer, A. J. 1956.. Penguin Books, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Barber, M. 2009. Holism and Horizon: Husserl and McDowell on Non-conceptual Content.25:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10743-008-9035-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Batterman, R. 2009. On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science.1-25. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axp018.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Benferhat, S. 2010. Interventions and belief cange in possibilistic graphical models.174(2):177-189.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Broonen, J.-P. 2010. Volition and the Theora of Planned Behaviour: How to Fill the Gap Between Intention and Performance? In Dubois, D., ed.,, volume 1303, 315-323. CASYS'09 Ninth International Conference.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Canestri, J. 2012. Sprache, Neurowissenschaft und Psychoanalyse.. DOI:10.1007/s00451-011-0092-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Chandrasekharan, S. 2009. Building to Discover: A Common Coding Model.33:1059-1086.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Chater, N. 2008. Rational and Mechanistic Perspectives on Reinforcement Learning.. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.014.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, H. L. 2007. Why Heideggerian AI Failed and how Fixing it would Require making it more Heideggerian.171(18):1137-1160.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Dürrbaum, A.; Scherm, W.; and Sommer, H. 2008. Systemidentifikation mittels Glaubenskalkül.7:350-356.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Erdinast-Vulcan, D. 2007. That Which ‘Has No Name in Philosophy’: Merleau-Ponty and the Language of Literature.30:395-409. doi: 10.1007/s10746-007-9069-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Froese, T., and Ziemke, T. 2009. Enactive Artificial Intelligence: Investigating the Systematic Organization of Life and Mind.173(3-4):466-500.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Goertzel, B., and Pennachin, C. 2007.. New York: Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Hajicek, P., and Tolar, J. 2009. Intrinsic Properties of Quantum Systems.doi: 10.1007/s10701-009-9296-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Hartimo, M. 2011. Husserl's Pluralistic Phenomenology of Mathematics.. DOI:10.1093phimat/nkr032.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Hernandez-Grallo, J., and Dowe, D. 2010. Measuring Universal Intelligence: Towards an Anytime Intelligence Test.. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.006.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Herzenberg, C. 2008. Grete Hermann: An early contributor to Quantum Theory. arXiv: 0812.3986[quant-ph].
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Hilbert, D. 1964.. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Hopp, W. 2009. Phenomenology and Fallibility.25:1-14.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Hornberger, K. 2009. Introduction to Decoherence Theory.768:223-278.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Husserl, E. 1913.Hamburg: Meiner.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Hutter, M. 2009a. Open Problems in Universal Induction and Intelligence. arXiv: 0907.0746v1[cs.AI]4July2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Hutter, M. 2009b. Feature Reinforcement Learning: Part I. Unstructured MDPs.1:3-24.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Kosowski, L. 2012. The structure of noema in the process of objectivation.doi: 10.1007/s10743-012-9102-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Kuusela, M.; Vatanen, T.; Malmi, E.; Raiko, T.; Aaltonen, T.; and Nagai, Y. 2011. Semi-supervised anomaly detection - towards model independent searches of new physics. arXiv: 1102.3329v1[physics.data-an] 14 Dec 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Legg, S., and Hutter, M. 2007. Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence.17(4):391-444.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Leitgeb, H., and Ladyman, J. 2008. Criteria of Identity and Structuralist Ontology.III(16):388-396.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Macbeth, D. 2011. Seeing how it goes: Paper-and-pencil reasoning in mathematical practice.DOI:10.1093phimat/nkr006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Maddy, P. 2007.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Mittelstaedt, P. 2011. The problem of interpretation of modern physics.. DOI:10.1007/10701-011-9571-2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Moran, D. 2008. Husserl's Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism.doi: 10.1007/s11007-008-9088-3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Pollock, J. L. 2006. Against Optimality: Logical Foundations for Decision-Task Planning in Autonomous Agents.20(1):1-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Schlosshauer, M. 2008. Classicality, the Ensemble Interpretation, and Decoherence: Resolving the Hyperion Dispute.doi: 10.1007/s10701-008-9237-x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Schmid, U., and Kitzelmann, E. 2011. Inductive rule learning on the knowledge level.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Schreiber, L., and Sommer, H. 2010. Can Mathematics be Justified by Natural Logic? In Dubois, D., ed.,, volume 1303, 189-198. CASYS'09 Ninth International Conference.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Sher, G. 2010. Is logic in the mind or in the world?doi: 10.1007/S11229-010-9796-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Sommer, H. 2009. Emergence of Classical Reality From a Quantum Mechanical Background.39:1027-1036.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Srivastava, S.; Immerman, N.; and Zilberstein, S. 2010. A New Representation and Associated Algorithms for Generalized Planning.doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.10.006.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Stenlund, S. 2010. Different senses of finitude: An inquiry into Hilbert's finitism.doi: 10.1007/S11229-010-9823-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Stuckey, W.; Silberstein, M.; and Cifone, M. 2009. Reconciling Spacetime and the Quantum: Relational Blockworld and the Quantum Liar Paradox.38:348-383. doi: 10.1007/s10701-008-9206-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Symons, J. 2008. Computational Models of Emergent Properties.. doi: 10.1007/s11023-008-9120-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Tarrazo, M. 2004. Schopenhauer's prolegomenon to fuzziness.3:227-254.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Tversky, A., and Kahnemann, D. 1983. Extension versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probabiliy judgment.90(4):293-315.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Veness, J.; Ng, K.; Hutter, M.; and Silver, D. 2009. A Monte Carlo AIXI Approximation. arXiv: 0909.0801v1[cs.AI]4Sep, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Wang, P. 1994. From inheritance relations to nonaxiomatic logic.11:281-319.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Wang, P. 2007. Three Fundamental Misconceptions of Artificial Intelligence.19(3):249-268.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Wang, P. 2009. Formalization of Evidence: Comparative Study.1:25-53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Wang, P. 2011. From NARS to a thinking machine.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Weyl, H. 1968., volume 3. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. chapter The Gost of Modality, 684-709.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Yager, R. 1994. Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling.67(2):129-145.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Zeh, H. 1999. The Meaning of Decoherence. arXiv: quant-ph/9905004v2 29.6.1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Zuh, D. 2011. Wogegen wandte sich Husserl 1891?doi: 10.1007/s10743-11-9100-3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Zurek, W. 1998. Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, and the Existential Interpretation.356:1793-1821. arXiv: [quant-ph]9805065.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Zurek, W. 2007. Relative States and the Environment: Einselection, Envariance, Quantum Darwinismus, and the Existential Interpretation. arXiv: 0707.2832v1[quant-ph]19.7.2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10229-011-0014-4 | Journal eISSN: 1946-0163
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 47
Published on: May 17, 2012
Published by: Artificial General Intelligence Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Cognition,
Natural logic,
Intelligence,
Husserl,
Hilbert
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence

© 2012 Hanns Sommer, Lothar Schreiber, published by Artificial General Intelligence Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2012): Issue 1 (May 2012)
Previous article