Effect of Sex Ratio in the Litter in Which Polish Large White and Polish Landrace Sows were Born on the Number of Piglets Born and Reared
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2012References
- Drickamer L. C., Arthur R. D., Rosenthal T. L. (1997). Conception failure in swine: importance of the sex ratio of a female's birth litter and tests of other factors. J. Anim. Sci., 75: 2192-2196.
- Drickamer L. C., Rosenthal T. L., Arthur R. D. (1999). Factors affecting the number of teats in pigs. J. Reprod. Fertil., 115: 97-100.
- Eckert R., Żak G. (2011). Results of performance tested gilts. Report on pig breeding in Poland in 2010. Kraków, XXIX: 34-44.
- Foxcroft G. R., Dixon W. T., Dyck M. K., Novak S., Harding J. C., Almeida F. C. (2009). Prenatal programming of postnatal development in the pig. Soc. Reprod. Fertil., Suppl., 66: 213-231.
- Foxcroft G. R., Dixon W. T., Novak S., Putman C. T., Town S. C., Vinsky M. D. (2006). The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. J. Anim. Sci., Suppl., 84: E105-112.
- Górecki T. (2003). Sex ratio in litters of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica Linnaeus, 1758). Biol. Lett., 40: 111-118.
- Górecki T., Kościński K. (2003). Offspring sex ratio in domestic goat (Capra hircus). Arch. Tierzucht., 46: 277-284.
- Hotchkiss A. K., Lambright C. S., Ostby J. S., Parks-Saldutti L., Vandenbergh J. G., Gray L. E. Jr. (2007). Prenatal testosterone exposure permanently masculinizes anogenital distance, nipple development, and reproductive tract morphology in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol. Sci., 96: 335-345.
- Huehn H., Tuchscherer A., Breite L., Grodzycki M., Huehn U. (2002). Influence of base litter sex ratio of gilts on their subsequent reproductive performances. Zuchtungskunde 74: 56-69.
- Hurd P. L., Bailey A. A., Gongal P. A., Yan R. H., Greer J. J., Pagliardini S. (2008). Intrauterine position effects on anogenital distance and digit ratio in male and female mice. Archiv. Sexual Behav., 37: 9-18.
- Orzechowska B., Mucha A. (2011). Results of reproductive performance of breeding sows. Report on pig breeding in Poland in 2010. Kraków, XXIX: 3-18.
- Orzechowska B., Tyra M., Mucha A. (2002). Reproductive performance of sows from litters of various sex ratio. Ann. Anim. Sci., 2: 155-159.
- Orzechowska B., Tyra M., Mucha A. (2011). Evaluation of pig breeding value using the BLUP method. Reproductive performance. Kraków, VII: 1, 3-6.
- Owsianny J., Wejksza D., Czarnecki R. (1991). Reproductiveness of gilts originated from litters with the different participation of young boars. Abstr. 42nd Ann. Meet. EAAP, 8-12.09.1991, Berlin, 2, p. 473.
- Rekiel A., Więcek J., Wojtasik M., Kulisiewicz J., Batorska M. (2010). The internal environment and reproduction in multifetal species (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., Monogr. Rozpr., 44: 79-88.
- Rekiel A., Wojtasik M. (2010). Sex ratio in populations in terms of maximization of reproductive success (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., Monogr. Rozpr., 44: 113-126.
- Rohde Parfet K. A., Ganjam V. K., Lamberson W.R, Rieke A. R., vom Saal F. S., Day B. N. (1990 a). Intrauterine position effects in female swine: subsequent reproductive performance, and social and sexual behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 26, 4: 349-362.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90034-B" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/0168-1591(90)90034-B</a>
- Rohde Parfet K. A., Lamberson W. R., Rieke A. R., Centlez T. C., Ganjam V. K., vom Saal F. S., Day B. N. (1990 b). Intrauterine position effects in male and female swine subsequent survivability, growth rate, morphology and semen characteristics. J. Anim. Sci., 68, 1: 179-185.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.681179x2303395" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2527/1990.681179x2303395</a>
- Ryan B. C., Vandenbergh J. G. (2002). Intrauterine position effects. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 26: 665-678.
- Salazar-Martinez E., Romano-Riquer P., Yanez-Marquez E., Longnecker M. P., Hernandez-Avila M. (2004). Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Environ. Health, 3, p. 8.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-3-852108415363098" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1186/1476-069X-3-852108415363098</a>
- SPSS 2009. User's Guide 12.0. SPSS Inc.
- Stasiak A. (1996). Interdependence between sexual activity of gilts during oestrus, development of reproductive organs, and potential and actual fertility (in Polish). Rozpr. Nauk. Wyd. AR Lublin.
- Toro M. A., Fernández A., García-Cortés L. A., Rodrigáñez J., Silió L. (2006). Sex ratio variation in Iberian pigs. Genetics, 173: 911-917.
- Vandenbergh J. G. (2003). Prenatal hormone exposure and sexual variation. Am. Scientist, 91: 218-225.
- Walkiewicz A., Babicz M., Kasprzyk A., Dziura J. (2000). Analysis of piglet sex distribution in litters from PL breeding sows and the relationship between litter traits and reproductive performance of gilts reared. Ann. UMCS, sectio EE Zootech., 18: 61-68.
- Walkiewicz A., Stasiak A. (1988). Variation in uniformity of litters from breeding sows of the Puławska and Polish Large White breeds (in Polish). Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 335: 135-141.
- Weiss B. (2006). Anogenital Distance: Defining "Normal". Environ. Health Perspect., 114, p. 399.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.114-a399a151330716835039" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1289/ehp.114-a399a151330716835039</a>
Language: English
Page range: 179 - 185
Published on: Apr 20, 2012
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2012 Anna Rekiel, Justyna Więcek, Monika Wojtasik, Jarosław Ptak, Tadeusz Blicharski, Leszek Mroczko, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.