Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is Poultry Exudate a Missing Link in Spreading Campylobacter SP. In Poland? Cover

Is Poultry Exudate a Missing Link in Spreading Campylobacter SP. In Poland?

Open Access
|Jan 2013

References

  1. 1. Alter T., Gaull F., Froeb A., Fehlhaber K.: Distribution of Campylobacter jejuni strains at different stages o a turkey slaughter line. Food Microbiol 2005, 22, 345-351.10.1016/j.fm.2004.08.008
  2. 2. Atanassova V., Reich F., Beckmann L., Klein G.: Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in turkey meat from a slaughterhouse and in turkey meat retail products. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2007, 49, 141-145.10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00180.x
  3. 3. Daczkowska-Kozon E., Sawicki W., Czekajło-Kołodziej U.: Campylobacters on processed broiler carcasses in the annual cycle. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2008, 52, 97-102.
  4. 4. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific Opinion on Quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU. EFSA J 2010, 8, 1437-1525.10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1437
  5. 5. Gunther IV N.W.: Effects of polyphosphate additives on Campylobacter survival in processed chicken exudates. Appl Env Microbiol 2010, 76, 2419-2424.10.1128/AEM.02865-09
  6. 6. GUS. Statistical yearbook of the Republic of Poland. 2001. ed. ZWS, Warsaw, 2009,
  7. 7. ISO 10272. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs- Horizontal method for detection of thermotolerant Campylobacter. 1995, 1-15.
  8. 8. Ligowska M., Thorup Cohn M., Stabler R.A., Wren B.W., Brøndsted L.: Effect of chicken meat environment on gene expression of Campylobacter jejuni and its relevance to survival in food. Int J Food Microbiol 2011, 145, 111-115.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.08.027
  9. 9. Luber P., Scherer K., Bartlem E.: Contamination of retail chicken legs with Campylobacter spp. Fleischwirtschaft 2005, 85, 93-95.
  10. 10. Madden R.H., Moran L., Scates P.: Sub-typing of animal and human Campylobacter spp. using RAPD. Lett Appl Microbiol 2008, 23, 167-170.10.1111/j.1472-765X.1996.tb00056.x
  11. 11. Petrie A., Watson P.: Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1999, pp. 101-112.
  12. 12. Rajkovic A., Tomic N., Smigic N., Uyttendaele M., Ragaert P., Devlieghere F.: Survival of Campylobacterjejuni on raw chicken legs packed in high-oxygen or high-carbon dioxide atmosphere after the decontamination with lactic acid/sodium lactate buffer. Int J Food Microbiol 2010, 140, 201-206.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.034
  13. 13. Reiersen J., Briem H., Hardardottir H., Gunnarsson E., Georgsson F., Kristinsson K.G.: Human campylobacteriosis epidemic in Iceland 1998-2000 and effect of interventions aimed at poultry and humans. In: Proceedings of 11th International Workshop onCampylobacter, Helicobacter and related organisms. Freiburg, Germany 2001, p. 153 (Q-10).
  14. 14. Rosenquist H., Nielsen N.L., Sommer H.M., Norrung B., Christensen B.B.: Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in chickens. Int J Food Microbiol 2003, 83, 87-103.10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00317-3
  15. 15. Sampers I., Habib I., Berkvens D., Dumoulin A., Zutter L.D., Uyttendaele M.: Processing practices contributing to Campylobacter contamination in Belgian chicken meat preparation. Int J Food Microbiol 2008, 128, 297-303.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.08.02418947895
  16. 16. Sampers I., Habib I., Zutter L.D., Dumoulin A., Uyttendaele M.: Survival of Campylobacter spp. in poultry meat preparations subjected to freezing, refrigeration, minor salt concentration, and heat treatment. Int J Food Microbiol 2010, 137, 147-153.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.01320006911
  17. 17. Simmons M., Hiett K.L., Stern N.J., Frank J.F.: Comparison of poultry exudate and carcass rinse sampling methods for the recovery of Campylobacter spp. subtypes demonstrates unique subtypes recovered from exudate. J Microbiol Meth 2008, 74, 89-93.10.1016/j.mimet.2008.03.00718495278
  18. 18. Steinhauserova I., Ceskova J., Fojtikova K., Obrovska I.: Identification of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. by phenotypic and molecular methods. J Appl Microb 2001, 90, 470-475.10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01267.x11298244
  19. 19. Wainø M., Bang D.D., Lund M., Nordentoft S., Andersen J.S, Pedersen K., Madsen M.: Identification of campylobacteria isolated from Danish broilers by phenotypic tests and species - specific PCR assays. J Appl Microb 2003, 95, 649-655.10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01996.x12969276
  20. 20. Williams L.K., Jørgensen F., Grogono-Thomas R.,. Humphrey T.J.: Enrichment culture for the isolation of Campylobacter spp: Effects of incubation conditions and the inclusion of blood in selective broth. Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 130, 131-134.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.01819217181
  21. 21. Winters D.K., O’Leary A.E., Slavik M.F.: Polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of Campylobacterjejuni in artificially contaminated foods. Lett Appl Microbio1 998, 27, 163-167.10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00411.x
  22. 22. Workman S.N., An investigation of sources of Campylobacter in a poultry production and packing operation in Barbados. Int J Food Microbiol 2008, 121, 106-111.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.10.01418061296
Language: English
Page range: 499 - 505
Published on: Jan 17, 2013
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2013 Elżbieta Grażyna Daczkowska-Kozon, Wojciech Sawicki, Urszula Czekajło-Kołodziej, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.