Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is Poultry Exudate a Missing Link in Spreading Campylobacter SP. In Poland? Cover

Is Poultry Exudate a Missing Link in Spreading Campylobacter SP. In Poland?

Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume 56 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jan 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Alter T., Gaull F., Froeb A., Fehlhaber K.: Distribution ofstrains at different stages o a turkey slaughter line. Food Microbiol 2005,, 345-351.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Atanassova V., Reich F., Beckmann L., Klein G.: Prevalence ofspp. in turkey meat from a slaughterhouse and in turkey meat retail products. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2007,, 141-145.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. DaczkowskaKozon E., Sawicki W., Czekajło-Kołodziej U.: Campylobacters on processed broiler carcasses in the annual cycle. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2008,, 97-102.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific Opinion on Quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU. EFSA J 2010,, 1437-1525.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Gunther IV N.W.: Effects of polyphosphate additives onsurvival in processed chicken exudates. Appl Env Microbiol 2010,, 2419-2424.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. GUS. Statistical yearbook of the Republic of Poland. 2001. ed. ZWS, Warsaw, 2009,
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. ISO 10272. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs- Horizontal method for detection of thermotolerant. 1995, 1-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Ligowska M., Thorup Cohn M., Stabler R.A., Wren B.W., Brøndsted L.: Effect of chicken meat environment on gene expression ofand its relevance to survival in food. Int J Food Microbiol 2011,, 111-115.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Luber P., Scherer K., Bartlem E.: Contamination of retail chicken legs withspp. Fleischwirtschaft 2005,, 93-95.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Madden R.H., Moran L., Scates P.: Sub-typing of animal and humanr spp. using RAPD. Lett Appl Microbiol 2008,, 167-170.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Petrie A., Watson P.: Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1999, pp. 101-112.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Rajkovic A., Tomic N., Smigic N., Uyttendaele M., Ragaert P., Devlieghere F.: Survival ofon raw chicken legs packed in high-oxygen or high-carbon dioxide atmosphere after the decontamination with lactic acid/sodium lactate buffer. Int J Food Microbiol 2010,, 201-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Reiersen J., Briem H., Hardardottir H., Gunnarsson E., Georgsson F., Kristinsson K.G.: Human campylobacteriosis epidemic in Iceland 1998-2000 and effect of interventions aimed at poultry and humans. In:Freiburg, Germany 2001, p. 153 (Q-10).
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Rosenquist H., Nielsen N.L., Sommer H.M., Norrung B., Christensen B.B.: Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilicspp. in chickens. Int J Food Microbiol 2003,, 87-103.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Sampers I., Habib I., Berkvens D., Dumoulin A., Zutter L.D., Uyttendaele M.: Processing practices contributing tocontamination in Belgian chicken meat preparation. Int J Food Microbiol 2008,, 297-303.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Sampers I., Habib I., Zutter L.D., Dumoulin A., Uyttendaele M.: Survival ofspp. in poultry meat preparations subjected to freezing, refrigeration, minor salt concentration, and heat treatment. Int J Food Microbiol 2010,, 147-153.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Simmons M., Hiett K.L., Stern N.J., Frank J.F.: Comparison of poultry exudate and carcass rinse sampling methods for the recovery ofspp. subtypes demonstrates unique subtypes recovered from exudate. J Microbiol Meth 2008,4, 89-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Steinhauserova I., Ceskova J., Fojtikova K., Obrovska I.: Identification of thermophilicspp. by phenotypic and molecular methods. J Appl Microb 2001,, 470-475.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Wainø M., Bang D.D., Lund M., Nordentoft S., Andersen J.S, Pedersen K., Madsen M.: Identification of campylobacteria isolated from Danish broilers by phenotypic tests and species - specific PCR assays. J Appl Microb 2003,, 649-655.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Williams L.K., Jørgensen F., Grogono-Thomas R.,. Humphrey T.J.: Enrichment culture for the isolation ofspp: Effects of incubation conditions and the inclusion of blood in selective broth. Int J Food Microbiol 2009,, 131-134.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Winters D.K., O’Leary A.E., Slavik M.F.: Polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection ofin artificially contaminated foods. Lett Appl Microbio1 998,, 163-167.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Workman S.N., An investigation of sources ofin a poultry production and packing operation in Barbados. Int J Food Microbiol 2008,, 106-111.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10213-012-0088-z | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 499 - 505
Published on: Jan 17, 2013
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Campylobacter sp.,
poultry exudates,
bulk containers,
RAPD-types
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Microbiology and virology,
Life sciences, other,
Medicine,
Veterinary medicine

© 2013 Elżbieta Grażyna Daczkowska-Kozon, Wojciech Sawicki, Urszula Czekajło-Kołodziej, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 56 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
Previous article
Next article