Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Isolation of Yersinia Enterocolitica O:9 From Cows Positive in Serological Examination of Bovine Brucellosis Cover

Isolation of Yersinia Enterocolitica O:9 From Cows Positive in Serological Examination of Bovine Brucellosis

Open Access
|Jan 2013

References

  1. 1. Commission Regulation (EC) No 535/2002 of 21 March 2002 amending Annex C to Council Directive 64/432/EEC and amending Decision 2000/330/EC.
  2. 2. Corbel M.J., Gill K.P.W., Thomas E.L.: Methods for the identification of. Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, UK, 1983, pp. 1-63.
  3. 3. Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine. OJ L 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977.
  4. 4. Foster G., MacMillan A.P., Godfroid J., Howie F., Ross H.M., Cloeckaert A., Reid R.J., Brew S., Patterson I.A.P.: A review ofsp. infection of sea mammals with particular emphasis on isolates from Scotland, Vet Microbiol 2002,, 563-580.
  5. 5. Gall D., Nielsen K., Forbes L., Davis D., Elzer P., Olsen S., Balsevicius S., Kelly L., Smith P., Tan S., Joly D.: Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay and comparison to other serological assays for the detection of serum antibodies toin bison. J Wildl Dis 2000,, 469-476.
  6. 6. Garin-Bastuji B., Hummel N., Gerbier G., Cau C., Pouillot R., Da Costa M., Fontaine J.J.: Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses ofO:9. Vet Microbiol 1999,, 223-233.
  7. 7. Gerbier G., Garin-Bastuji B., Pouillot R., Véry P., Cau C., Berr V., Dufour B., Moutou F.: False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role ofserotype O:9 in a field trial. Vet Res 1997,, 375-383.
  8. 8. Grattarola C., Gennero M.S., Zoppi S., Bergagna S., Chiavacci L., Dondo A.:and its role in bovine brucellosis monitoring: a statistical analysis. Epidémiol Santé Anim 2006,, 153-155.
  9. 9. Instruction No 26/2003 of the Chief Veterinary Officer, Warsaw, 2003.
  10. 10. Instruction No 27/2003 of the Chief Veterinary Officer, Warsaw, 2003.
  11. 11. Instruction No 28/2003 of the Chief Veterinary Officer, Warsaw, 2003.
  12. 12. Jungersen G., Sørensen V., Giese S.B., Stack J.A., Riber U.: Differentiation between serological responses toandserotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs. Epidemiol Infect 2006,, 347-357.
  13. 13. Konstantinidis A., Minas A., Pournaras S., Kansouzidou A., Papastergiou P., Maniatis A., Stathakis N., Hadjichristodoulou C.: Evaluation and comparison of fluorescence polarization assay with three of the currently used serological tests in diagnosis of human brucellosis. Europ J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007,, 715-721.
  14. 14. Królak M., Stryszak M.: Standard technique of 2- mercaptoethanol test in diagnosis of animal brucellosis. NVRI Pulawy, Poland, 1979.
  15. 15. Lubeck P.S., Skurnik M., Akrens., Hoorfar J.: A Multiplex PCR-detection assay forserotype O:9 andspp. based on perosamine synthetase gene. Adv Exp Med Biol 2003,, 451-455.
  16. 16. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. OIE, Paris, 2012. http://www.oie.int/international-standardsetting/terrestrial-manual/access-online/
  17. 17. Nielsen K., Gall D., Bermudez R., Renteria T., Moreno F., Corral A., Monroy O., Monqe F., Smith P., Widdison J., Mardrueno M., Calderon N., Guerrero N., Tinoco R., Osuna J., Kelly W.: Field trial of the brucellosis fluorescence polarization assay. J Immunoassay Immunochem 2002,, 307-316.
  18. 18. Nielsen K., Smith P., Widdison J., Gall D., Kelly L., Kelly W., Nicoletti P.: Serological relationship between cattle exposed to,O:9 andO:157:H7. Vet Microbiol 2004,, 25-30.
  19. 19. Pilaszek J., Szulowski K., Iwaniak W.: Epidemiological condition of animal brucellosis in Poland. Medycyna Wet 2000,, 363-366.
  20. 20. Riber U., Jungersen G.: Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections withfromserotype O:9 in pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2007,, 13-25.
  21. 21. Romero C., Gamazo C., Pardo M., Lopez-Goni I.: Specific detection ofDNA by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1995,, 615-617.
  22. 22. Scholz H.C., Nöckler K., Göllner C., Bahn P., Vergnaud G., Tomaso H., Al Dahouk S., Kämpfer P., Cloeckaert A., Maquart M., Zygmunt M.S., Whatmore A.M., Pfeffer M., Huber B., Busse H.J., De B.K.:sp. nov., isolated from a breast implant infection. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010,, 801-808.
  23. 23. Szulowski K., Iwaniak W., Pilaszek J.: Porcine brucellosis in Poland: problems accompanying serological surveys conducted in 1995-2000. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2001,, 153-161.
  24. 24. Szulowski K., Iwaniak W., Weiner M., Złotnicka J., Szymajda M., Zaręba Z., Czępińska H.: Diagnosis and epidemiological condition of bovine brucellosis in Poland. Medycyna Wet 2012,, 110-113.
  25. 25. Szulowski K., Iwaniak W., Złotnicka J., Weiner M., Zaręba Z., Czępińska H.: International trade - a potential source of brucellosis in pigs. Medycyna Wet 2011,, 64-66.
  26. 26. Weiner M., Złotnicka J., Iwaniak W., Szulowski K.: Development of a multiplex PCR for identification ofsp. and cross-reactingO:9. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2011,, 603-607.
  27. 27. Weynants V., Tibor A., Denoel P.A., Saegerman C., Godfroid J., Thiange P., Letesson J.J.: Infection of cattle withO:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests. Vet Microbiol 1996,, 101-112.
  28. 28. Wiśniowski J., Królak M., Drożdżyńska M.: Standard technique of anti-globulin test in diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. NVRI Pulawy, Poland. 1978.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10213-012-0083-4 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Language: English
Page range: 473 - 477
Published on: Jan 17, 2013
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Marcin Weiner, Krzysztof Szulowski, Wojciech Iwaniak, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.