Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization for inferring outranking model’s parameters under scarce reference information and effects of reinforced preference Cover

Evolutionary multi-objective optimization for inferring outranking model’s parameters under scarce reference information and effects of reinforced preference

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 37 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)
By: Eduardo Fernandez,  Jorge Navarro and  Gustavo Mazcorro  
Open Access
|Oct 2012

References

  1. [1] Butler, J., Jia, J., Dyer, J., Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models, European Journal of Operational Research 103, 1997, 531-546.10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00307-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Coello, C.A., Lamont, G.B., Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Evolutionary Algorithms for SolvingMultiObjective Problems, Second Edition. Springer, New York, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Deb, K., Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester-New York-Weinheim-Brisbane-Singapore-Toronto, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Dias, L.,Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Climaco, J., An aggregation / disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE-TRI, European Journal of Operational Research 138, 2, 2002, 332-348.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00250-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Dias, L.C., Mousseau, V., Inferring ELECTRE's veto-related parameters from outranking examples, European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 1, 2006, 172-191.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.044
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C., Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht-Boston- London, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Doumpos, M., Marinakis, Y., Marimaki, M., Zopounidis, C., An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of ELECTRE TRI method, European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 2, 2009, 496-505.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.035
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Fernandez, E., Navarro, J. and Duarte, Α., Multicriteria sorting using a valued preference closeness relation, European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 2, 2008, 673-686.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.041
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Fernandez, E., Navarro, J., Bernal, S., Multicriteria sorting using a valued indifference relation under a preference disaggregation paradigm, European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 2, 2009, 602-609.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.09.020
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Goletsis, Y., Psarras, J., Samouilidis, J.E., Project Ranking in the Armenian Energy Sector Using a Multicriteria Method for Groups, Annals of Operations Research, 120, 2003, 135-157.10.1023/A:1023330530111
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking with a set of additive value functions, European Journal of Operational Research, 191, 2008, 415-435.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.08.013
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R., Zanakis, S., Global investing risk: a case study of knowledge assessment via rough sets, Annals of Operations Research, 185, 2011, 103-138.10.1007/s10479-009-0542-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Siskos, J., Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method, European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 2, 1982, 151-164.10.1016/0377-2217(82)90155-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Keeney R., Raiffa H., Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, 1976.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Mangasarian, O.L., Multisurface method for pattern separation, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14, 6, 1968, 801-807.10.1109/TIT.1968.1054229
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Marchant, T., Debate on How to assign numerical values to different parameters that aim at differentiating the role that the criteria have to play in a comprehensive preference model?, 71 Meeting of the Euro Working Group Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, Turin, Italy, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Mavrotas, G., Diakoulaki, D., Capros, P., Combined MCDA-IP Approach for Project Selection in the Electricity Market, Annals of Operations Research, 120, 2003, 159-170.10.1023/A:1023382514182
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Michalewicz, Z., Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1996.10.1007/978-3-662-03315-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., Inferring an ELECTRE-TRI model from assignment examples, Journal of Global Optimization, 12,2, 1998, 157-174.10.1023/A:1008210427517
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Naux, J.Ph., Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results, European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 2, 2001, 263-275.10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00041-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Mousseau, V., Dias, L.C., Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures, European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 2, 2004, 467-482.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00120-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Perny, P., Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance and non- discordance principles, Annals of Operations Research, 80, 1998, 137-165.10.1023/A:1018907729570
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Pekelman, D., Sen, S.K., Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights, Management Science, 20, 1974, 1217-1229.10.1287/mnsc.20.8.1217
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Pirlot, M., Debate on How to assign numerical values to different parameters that aim at differentiating the role that the criteria have to play in a comprehensive preference model?, 71 Meeting of the Euro Working Group Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, Turin, Italy, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Teixeira Almeida, Α., Multicriteria Modelling of Repair Contract Based on Utility and ELECTRE I Method with Dependability and Service Quality Criteria, Annals of Operations Research, 138,2005, 113-126.10.1007/s10479-005-2448-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Roy, B., The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, in: Bana e Costa, C.A., (ed.), Reading in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer­Verlag, Berlin, 1990, 155-183.10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_8
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Roy, Β., Slowinski, R., Handling effects of reinforced preference and counter-veto in credibility of outranking, European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 1, 2008, 185-190.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Srinavasan, V., Shocker, A.D, Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences, Psichometrika, 38,3, 1973, 337-396.10.1007/BF02291658
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10209-011-0010-0 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 163 - 197
Published on: Oct 1, 2012
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Multiple criteria analysis,
Fuzzy outranking relations,
Parameter inference,
Evolutionary algorithms.
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Software development

© 2012 Eduardo Fernandez, Jorge Navarro, Gustavo Mazcorro, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 37 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)Next article