Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrating imperfection of information into the promethee multicriteria decision aid methods: a general framework Cover

Integrating imperfection of information into the promethee multicriteria decision aid methods: a general framework

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 37 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Oct 2012
References

References

  1. [1] M. Behzadian, R.B. Kazemzadh, A. Albadvi D. and M. Aghdasi, “PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications”,, in press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] S. Ben Amor, K. Jabeur and J-M. Martel, “Multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations”,, 181(3), pp. 1506-1515, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal “PROMCALC & GAIA: A new decision support system for multicriteria decision aid”,, 12, pp.297-310, 1994.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. [4] J.P. Brans and B. Mareschal “PROMETHEE Methods” inedited by J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, pp.163-196, Kluwer, 2005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. [5] D. Dubois, H. Prade and S. Sandri, “On possibility/probability transformations”, Lowen R, Roubens M (eds),, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, pp.103-112, 1993.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. [6] J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott,., Kluwer, 2005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. [7] A. Langewish and F. Choobineh, “Stochastic dominance tests for ranking alternatives under ambiguity”,, 95, pp.139-154, 1996.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. [8] B. Mareschal, “Stochastic multicriteria decision-making under uncertainty”. European Journal of Operational Research 26 (1), 58-64, 1986.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. [9] B. Mareschal and J.P. Brans “Geometrical representations for MCDA”, European Journal of Operational Research, 39, pp. 284-292, 1989.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. [10] J-M. Martel and K. Zaras, “Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk”, Theory and Decision, 39, 31-49, 1995.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. [11] G. Munda,, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1995.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. [12]B. Roy,, Economica, Paris, 1985.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13]G. Shafer,, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J., 1976.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Ph. Smets, “Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation”,38, pp.133-147, 2005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Ph. Smets, “Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty”, in: Henrion M, Shachter RD, Kanal LN and Lemmer JF (eds),5, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp.29-40, 1990.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10209-011-0002-0 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 (formerly 0867-6356) | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 23
Published on: Oct 24, 2012
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
multiple criteria analysis,
multicriteria decision aid,
imperfection of information,
PROMETHEE
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Software development

© 2012 Sarah Ben Amor, Bertrand Mareschal, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 37 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)
Previous article
Next article