Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multicriteria Selection of Optimal Location of TCSC in a Competitive Energy Market Cover

Multicriteria Selection of Optimal Location of TCSC in a Competitive Energy Market

Journal of Electrical Engineering
Volume 61 (2010): Issue 3 (May 2010)
By: Muwaffaq Alomoush  
Open Access
|Jun 2011

References

  1. SHAHIDEHPOUR, M.—ALOMOUSH, M.: Restructured Electrical Power Systems: Operation, Trading and Volatility, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2001.10.1109/MCAP.2002.993762
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. ALOMOUSH, M.—SHAHIDEHPOUR, M.: Fixed Transmission Rights for Inter-Zonal and Intra-Zonal Congestion Management, IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. 146 No. 5 (1999), 465-477.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. ALOMOUSH, M.: Derivation of upfc dc load Flow Model with Examples of its Use in Restructured Power Systems, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18 No. 3 (2003), 1173-1180.10.1109/TPWRS.2002.805002
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. STOFT, S.: Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity, Wiley-IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey, 2002.10.1109/9780470545584
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. HINGORAN, N. G.—GYUGYI, L.: Understanding FACTS, Wiley-IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey, 2000.10.1109/9780470546802
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. SONG, Y. H.—JOHNS, A.: Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS), IEE Power Engineering Series 30, London, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. HIGNORANI, N. H.: Flexible AC Transmission Systems, IEEE Spectrum (Apr 1993), 40-45.10.1109/6.206621
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. EDRIS, A. S.—MEHRABAN, M.—RAHMAN, L.—GYUGYI, S. A.—REITMAN, T.: Controlling the Flow of Real and Reactive Power, IEEE Computer Appl. in Power (1998), 20-25.10.1109/67.648493
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. GE, S. Y.—CHUNG, T. S.: Optimal Active Power Flow Incorporating Power Flow Control Needs in Flexible AC Transmission Systems, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 14 No. 2 (1999), 738-744.10.1109/59.761906
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. GOTHAM, D. J.—HEYDT, G. T.: Power Flow Control and Power Flow Studies for Systems with Facts Devices, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 13 No. 1 (1998), 60-65.10.1109/59.651614
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. LI, N.—XU, Y.—CHEN, H.: Facts-Based Power Flow Control in Interconnected Power Systems, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15 No. 1 (2000), 257-262.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. VERMA, K. S.—SINGH, S. N.—GUPTA, H. O.: Facts Devices Location for Enhancement of Total Transfer Capability, Proc. IEEE PES Winter Meeting, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 2, 2001, pp. 522-527.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. MUTALE, J.—STRBAC, G.: Transmission Network Reinforcement versus Facts: an Economic Assessment, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15 No. 3 (2000), 961-967.10.1109/59.871719
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. NOROOZIAN, M.—ANDERSON, G.: Power Flow Control by Use of Controllable Series Components, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 8 No. 3 (1993), 1420-1-429.10.1109/61.252669
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. NOROOZIAN, M.—ANGQUIST, L.—GHANDHARI, M.— ANDERSON, G.: Improving Power System Dynamics by Series-Connected Facts Devices, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 12 No. 4 (1997), 1632-1642.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. SINGH, S. N.—DAVID, A. K.: A New Approach for Placement of Facts Devices in Open Power Markets, IEEE Power Eng. Rev. (Sep 2001), 58-60.10.1109/39.948616
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. SINGH, S. N.—DAVID, A. K.: Placement of Facts Devices in Open Power Markets, Proc. 5th International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management (APSCOM 20000), Hong Kong, Oct 2000, pp. 173-177.10.1049/cp:20000386
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. FUERTE-ESQUIVEL, C. R.—ACHA, E.—AMBRIZ-PEREZ, H.: A Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator Model for the Power Flow Solution of Practical Power Networks, IEEE Trans. Power Syst 15 No. 1 (2000), 58-64.10.1109/59.852101
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. LEHMKOSTER, C.: Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow for an Economical Operation of FACTS Devices in Liberalized Energy Market, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 17 (2002), 603-608.10.1109/61.997946
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. LEE, K. H.: Optimal Siting of TCSC for Reducing Congestion Cost by Using Shadow Prices, Electric Power and Energy Systems 24 (2002), 647-653.10.1016/S0142-0615(01)00077-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. XIA, Y.—SONG, Y. H.—SUN, Y. Z.: Power Flow Control Approach to Power Systems with Embedded FACTS Devices, IEEE Trans. Power Sys. 17 No. 4 (2002), 943-950.10.1109/TPWRS.2002.804919
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. PUDI, S. R.—SRIVASTAVA, S. C.: 'Optimal Placement of TCSC based on a Sensitivity Approach for Congestion Mmanagement, Proc. Fifteenth National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), IIT, Bombay, India, Dec 2008, pp. 558-563.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. CHANANA, S.—KUMAR, A.: Effect of Optimally Located FACTS Devices on Active and Reactive Power Price in Deregulated Electricity Markets, Proc. 2006 IEEE Power India Conference, New Delhi, India, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. HUANG, G.—NAIR, N.: An opf based Algorithm to Evaluate Load Curtailment Incorporating Voltage Stability Margin Criterion, Proc. 2001 NAPS Conference, College Station, Texas, Oct 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. KESSEL, P.—GLAVITSCH, H.: Estimating the Voltage Stability of a Power System, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 1 No. 3 (1986), 346-354.10.1109/TPWRD.1986.4308013
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. HUANG, G.—NAIR, N.: Voltage Stability Constrained Load Curtailment Procedure to Evaluate Power System Reliability Measures, Proc. IEEE PES Winter Meeting, New York, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. SAATY, T. L.: A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15 No. 3 (1977), 234-281.10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. LAHDELMA, R.—SALMINEN, P.—HOKKANEN, J.: Using Multicriteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management, Environmental Management 26 No. 6 (2000), 595-605.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. BRANS, J. P.—MARESCHAL, B.: PROMCALC & GAIA: A New Decision Support System for Multicriteria Decision Aid, Decision Support Systems 12 (1994), 297-310.10.1016/0167-9236(94)90048-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. FIGUEIRA, J.—GRECO, S.—EHRGOTT, M.: Decision in Multicriteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer Science, New York, 2005.10.1007/b100605
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. SISKOS, J.—HUBERT, P.: Multicriteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: a Survey and a New Comparative Approach, European Journal of Operational Research 13 No. 2 (1983), 278-299.10.1016/0377-2217(83)90057-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. LAI, Y. J.—HWANG, C. L.: Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.10.1007/978-3-642-57949-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. HOKKANEN, J.—SALMINEN, P.: ELECTRE I and II Decision Aids in an Environmental Problem, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6 No. 2 (1997), 215-226.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199707)6:4<;215::AID-MCDA139>3.0.CO;2-P
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. BANA E COSTA, C. A.: Readings in Multicriteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1990.10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. POMEROL, J-CH.—BARBA-ROMERO, S.: Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000.10.1007/978-1-4615-4459-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. ROGERS, M.—BRUEN, M.—MAYSTRE, L. Y.: ELECTRE and Decision Support, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, 2000.10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. ROY, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1996.10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. VINCKE, P.: Multicriteria Decision-Aid, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York, 1992.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. BRANS, J. P.—MARESCHAL, B.—VINCKE, P.: PROMETHEE: a New Family of Outranking Methods in MCDM, Proc. Conference of International Federation of Operational Research Societies (INFOR), North Holland, 1984, pp. 477-490.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. BRANS, J. P.—VINCKE, P.: A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for MCDM, Management Science 31 No. 6 (1985), 647-656.10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. BRANS, J. P.—MARESCHAL, B.—VINCKE, P.: How to Select and How to Rank Projects: The PROMETHEE Method for MCDM, European Journal of Operational Research 24 (1986), 228-238.10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. BRANS, J. P.—MARESCHAL, B.: PROMETHEE V: MCDM Problems with Additional Segmentation Constraints, INFOR 30 No. 2 (1992), 85-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10187-010-0019-2 | Journal eISSN: 1339-309X | Journal ISSN: 1335-3632
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 140
Published on: Jun 7, 2011
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year
Keywords:
decision-making,
competitive energy markets,
performance indices,
PROMETHEE,
transmission congestion,
thyristor controlled series compensator
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2011 Muwaffaq Alomoush, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 61 (2010): Issue 3 (May 2010)