Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predicting individual tree and stand diameter increment responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) after mountain forest selective cutting Cover

Predicting individual tree and stand diameter increment responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) after mountain forest selective cutting

Open Access
|Sep 2014

References

  1. Andreassen, K. 1994. Development and yield in selection forest. - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 47(5), 1-37.
  2. Andreassen, K., Øyen, B.-H. 2002. Economic consequences of three silvicultural methods in uneven- aged mature coastal spruce forest of central Norway. - Forestry, 75(4), 483-488.
  3. Andreassen, K., Øyen, B.-H. 2002b. New growth functions for spruce forest treated with selection cutting. - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 6/02, 10-12. (In Norwegian).
  4. Andreassen, K., Tomter, S.M. 2003. Basal area growth models for individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, Birch and other broadleaves in Norway. - Forest Ecology and Management, 180, 11-24.
  5. Bäckström, P.O. (ed.). 1986. Skogsforyngring i fjällnära skogar. (Regeneration in mountain forest). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Forestry Faculty, Report. 86 pp. (In Swedish with English summary).
  6. Biging, G., Dobbertin, M. 1995. Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. - Forest Science, 41(2), 360-377.
  7. Blingsmo, K.R. 1984. Diameter increment functions for stands of birch, Scots pine and Norway spruce. Research paper from the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 7/84, 1-22. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  8. Bøhler, F., Øyen, B.-H. 2011. Estimation of site index in old, semi-natural stands of Norway spruce at high altitude. - Research paper from Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, 1/11, 117. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  9. Bollandsås, O.M. 2007. Height-diameter models for individual trees in Norway. PhD-thesis, UMB, 30/2007. Uneven-aged forestry in Norway: inventory and management models. University of Life Sciences, Norway.
  10. Børset, O. 1994. Norsk fjellskogskjøtsel: et tilbakeblikk og en oppsummering. (Forest management in the Norwegian mountains - a review). - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 1/94, 1-12. (In Norwegian).
  11. Braastad, H. 1966. Volume tables for birch. - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 21, 23-78. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  12. Braastad, H. 1974. Diameter increment functions for Picea abies. - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 31, 359-537. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  13. Eerikäinen, K., Miina, J., Valkonen, S. 2007. Models for the regeneration establishment and the development of established seedlings in uneven-aged, Norway spruce dominated forest stands of southern Finland. - Forest Ecology and Management, 242(2-3), 444-461.
  14. Eid, T., Øyen, B.-H. 2003. Models for prediction of mortality in even-aged forest. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 64-77.
  15. Eid, T., Tuhus, E. 2000. Models for individual tree mortality in Norway. - Forest Ecology and Management, 154, 69-84.
  16. Eide, E., Langsæter, A. 1941. Growth and yield in Norwegian spruce forest. - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 7, 355-500. (In Norwegian with German summary).
  17. Fitje, A., Vestjordet, E. 1977. Stand height curves and new tariff tables for Norway spruce. - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 34(2), 23-68. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  18. Gjellan, P., Nilsen, H.C. 1990. Production and natural regeneration of Norway spruce in a 40-year period after selective cutting in mountain forests. MScthesis, Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Forest Sciences. 49 pp. (In Norwegian).
  19. Gobakken, T., Næsset, E. 2000. Spruce diameter growth in young mixed stands of Norway spruce and birch. Paper III. PhD Thesis, Agricultural University of Norway. Department of Forest Sciences, 34 (2000), 23 pp.
  20. Hagner, M., Lohmander, P., Lundgren, M. 2001. Computer- aided choice of trees for felling. - Forest Ecology and Management, 151, 151-161.
  21. Holgen, P., Søderberg, U., Hånell, B. 2003. Diameter increment in Picea abies shelterwood stands in northern Sweden. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 163-167.
  22. Holte, A., Solberg, B. 1989. A test of the accuracy of two individual tree growth functions for Picea abies. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 4, 247-257.
  23. Hynynen, J., Ahtikoski, A., Siitonen, J., Sievänen, R., Liski, J. 2005. Applying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effect of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production. - Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 5-18.
  24. Kielland-Lund, J. 1981. Die Waldgesellscahften SONorwegens. (Forest vegetation types in southeast Norway). - Phytocoenologia, 9, 53-250.
  25. Lähde, L., Laiho, O., Norokorpi, Y., Saksa, T. 2002. Development of Norway spruce dominated stands after single-tree selection and low thinning. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 1577-1584.
  26. Lexerød, N., Eid, T. 2005. Recruitment models for Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. - Silva Fennica, 39, 391-406.
  27. Lindman, J. 1986. Mountain selection cutting. Increment studies in four stands. MSc-thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture, Umeå. 52 pp. (In Swedish).
  28. Lundqvist, L. 1995. Simulation of sapling population dynamics in uneven-aged Picea abies forests. - Annals of Botany, 76, 371-380.
  29. Lundqvist, L. 2004. Stand development in uneven-aged subalpine Picea abies stands after partial harvest estimated from repeated surveys. - Forestry, 77(2), 119-130.
  30. Lundqvist, L., Crimes, D., Elfving, B., Mørling, T., Valinger, E. 2006. Stand development in two uneven- aged Picea abies forests in Sweden. - Forest Ecology and Management, 238, 141-146.
  31. Näslund, M. 1942. Growth reactions after selective cuttings in the spruce forest of Northern Sweden. - Communications of the Swedish Forest Research Institute, 33, 1-214. (In Swedish with German summary).
  32. Nilsen, P. 1988. Selective cutting in mountain spruce forests - regeneration and production after earlier cuttings. - Research paper from the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 2/88, 1-26. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  33. Nilsen, P. 2001. Modelling increment following mountain forest selective cutting. - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 2/01, 4-5. (In Norwegian).
  34. Nilsen, P., Haveraaen, O. 1983. Breadth of annual rings of remaining trees after cutting in old stands of Norway spruce. - Research paper from the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 9/83, 1-16. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  35. Ohlson, M., Tryterud, E. 1999. Long-term spruce continuity - a challenge for sustainable Scandinavian forestry. - Forestry Ecology and Management, 124, 27-34.
  36. Øyen, B.-H., Andreassen, K. 2002. Models for estimating tree heights by means of diameter and stand properties. - Research notes from Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 6/02, 13-14. (In Norwegian).
  37. Øyen, B.-H., Nilsen, P. 2002. Growth effects after mountain forest selective cutting in southeast Norway. - Forestry, 75(4), 401-410.
  38. Øyen, B.-H., Nilsen, P. 2004. Growth and recruitment after mountain forest selective cutting in irregular spruce forest. A case study in Northern Norway. - Silva Fennica, 38(4), 383-392.
  39. Pretzch, H., Biber, P., Dursky, J. 2002. The single tree based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation. - Forest Ecology and Management, 162(1), 3-21.
  40. Sarvas, R. 1944. Tukkipuun harsintojen vaikutus etelä- Suomen yksityismetsiin. (Effects from selection forestry on private forest land in southern Finland). - Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 33(1), 1-268. (In Finnish with German summary).
  41. SAS 1999. SAS release 8.02. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  42. Schütz, J.P. 1989. Der Plenterbetrieb. (Selection forestry). Fachbereich Waldbau, ETH. Zürich. 54 pp. (In German).
  43. Strand, L. 1983. Diameter increment functions based on data from mixed stands. - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 38(5), 1-10.
  44. Suadicini, K., Fjeld, D. 2001. Single-tree and group selection in montane Norway spruce stands: Factors influencing operational efficiency. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 79-87.
  45. Tahvonen, O., Pukkala, T., Laiho, O., Lähde, E., Niinimäki, A. 2010. Optimal management of unevenaged Norway spruce stands. - Forest Ecology and Management, 260(1), 106-115.
  46. Tveite, B. 1977. Site index curves for Norway spruce. (Picea abies L. Karst). - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 33, 1-84. (In Norwegian with English summary).
  47. Vestjordet, E. 1967. Functions and tables for volumes of Norway spruce. - Communications of the Norwegian Forest Research Institute, 22, 543-574. (In Norwegian with English summary)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10132-011-0100-z | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 45
Submitted on: Jan 24, 2012
Accepted on: Mar 25, 2012
Published on: Sep 19, 2014
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2014 Bernt-Håvard Øyen, Petter Nilsen, Fredrik Bøhler, Kjell Andreassen, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.