Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Combining spatial and other objectives in forest design Cover

Combining spatial and other objectives in forest design

Forestry Studies
Volume 48 (2008): Issue 2008 (June 2008)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Mar 2011
References

References

  1. Barrett, T. M., Gilless, J. K. 2000. Even-aged restriction with sub-graph adjacency. - Annals of Operations Research, 95, 259-175.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bettinger, P. Seccions, J., Johnson, K. N. 1998. Ensuring the compatibility of aquatic habitat and commodity production goals in eastern Oregon with a Tabu search procedure. - Forest Science, 44(1), 96-112
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bettinger, P., Sessions, J., Boston, K. 1997. Using tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. - Ecological Modelling, 94, 111-123.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Carter, D. R., Vogitazis, M., Moss, C. B., Arvantis, L. G. 1997. Ecosystem management or infeasible guidelines? Implications of adjacency restrictions for wildlife habitat and timber production. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 1302-1310.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Chen, B. W., Gadow, K.v. 2002. Timber harvest planning with spatial objectives, using the method of simulated annealing. - Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 121, 25-34
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Clutter, J. L., Fortson, J. C., Pienaar, L. V., Brister, G. H., Bailey, R. L. 1983. Timber Management - A Quantitative Approach. Wiley, 238-252.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Gadow, K.v. 1991. Integration of single- and general forest utilization in forest management. (Integration von Einzel- und Gesamtnutzungsplanung in der Forsteinrichtung). - Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 162(4), 72-75. (In German).
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Gadow, K.v., Kurttila, M., Leskinen, P., Leskinen, L., Nuutinen, T., Pukkala, T. 2007. Designing forested landscapes to provide multiple services. - CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2007 2, No. 038, 1-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Gadow, K.v., Pukkala, T. 2008. Designing Green Landscapes. Vol. 15 of the Book Series "Managing Forest Ecosystems". Springer Verlag, Dordrecht. 301 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Hille, M., Hessenmöller, D. Möhring, B., Gadow, K.v. 1999. Evaluating alternative silvicultural regimes in a 110-year old beech forest. - Provisional Proceedings "From Theory to Practice - Gaps and Solutions in Managerial Economics and Accounting in Forestry", Prague, Czech Republic, May 1999, 94-100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Hinrichs, L. 2006. Generating management paths for multi-species forests. (Automatisierte Generierung von Behandlungspfaden für Mischbestände.) - Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 177(5), 77-85. (In German).
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Hof, J. G., Joyce, L. A. 1992. Spatial optimization for wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. - Forest Science, 38(3), 489-508.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Hof, J. G., Joyce, L. A. 1993. A mixed integer linear programming approach for apatially optimisating wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. - Forest Science, 39(4), 816-834.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hof, J. G., Bevers, M., Joyce, L. A., Kent, B. 1994. An integer programming approach for spatially and temporally optimising wildlife population. - Forest Science, 39(4), 816-834.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hoganson, H. M., Rose, D. W. 1984. A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. - Forest Science, 30(1), 200-238.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Jones, J.G, Meneghin, B, Kirby M. W. 1991. Formulating adjacency constraints in linear optimization models for scheduling projects in tactical planning. - Forest Science, 37(5), 1283-1297.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Lappi, J. 1992. JLP - a linear programming package for management planning. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Paper, 414. 131 pp
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Murray, A. T. 1999. Spatial restrictions in harvests scheduling. - Forest Science, 45, 45-52.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Öhman, K., Eriksson, L. O. 1998. The core area concept in forming contiguous areas for long-term forest planning. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28(7), 1032-1039.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Öhman, K. 2000. Creating continuous area of old forest in long-term forest planning. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(11), 1817-1823.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Pukkala, T., Kangas, J. 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 560-570.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Rodriguez, L. 1996. A Microcomputer Program for Solving Forest Scheduling Problems with Heuristic Approaches. - Päivinen, R., Roihuvuo, L., Siitonen, M. (eds.). Large-scale forestry scenario models - experiences and requirements. European Forest Institute, EFI Proceedings, 5, 153-166.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Sánchez-Orois, S., Gurjanov, M., Schröder, J. 2001. Analysis of basal area growth in even-aged spruce stands. (Analyse des Grundflächenzuwachses gleichaltriger Fichtenreinbestände.) - Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 172(3), 51-59
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Schübeler, D. 1997. Analysing site-dependent growth in spruce. (Untersuchungen zur standortabhängigen Wachstumsmodellierung bei der Fichte.) - Dissertation (University of Göttingen). (In German).
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Seo, J.-H., Vilčko, F., Sánchez Orois, S., Kunth, S., Son, Y-M., Gadow, K.v. 2005. A case study of forest management planning using a new heuristic algorithm. - Tree Physiology, 25, 929-938.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Spellmann, H. and Nagel, J., Böckmann, T. 1999. Harvest planning based on systematic sample plots. (Summarische Nutzungsplanung auf der Basis von Betriebsinventurdaten). - Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung, 170(7), 122-128. (In German).
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Van Deusen, P. C. V. 2001. Scheduling spatial arrangement and harvest simultaneously. - Silva Fennica, 35(1), 85-92.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Vilčko, F. 2002. Quantifying harvest events anf yields in spruce stands. (Zur Quantifizierung forstlicher Eingriffe und Ertragsprognose in Fichtenbestände). - Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, 22 p. (In German).
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Ware, G. O., Clutter, J. L. 1971. A mathematical programming system for the management of industrial forests. - Forest Science, 17, 428-445.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Yoshimoto A. 2000. Risk analysis in the context of timber harvest planning. - Gadow, K.v. (ed.). Risk Analysis in Forest Management. Kluwer Academic Publishes.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Yoshimoto, A. 2001. Potential use of a spatially constrained harvest scheduling model for biodiversity concerns: exclusion periods to create heterogeneity in forest structure. - Journal of Forest Research, 6(1), 21-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10132-011-0053-2 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Estonian
Page range: 30 - 40
Published on: Mar 24, 2011
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
forest planning,
Simulated Annealing,
Norway spruce,
harvest scheduling,
even flow,
spatial model
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science

© 2011 Bo Chen, Klaus von Gadow, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 48 (2008): Issue 2008 (June 2008)
Previous article
Next article