Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Influence of Farm Size on Gendered Involvement in Crop Cultivation and Decision-making Responsibility of Moldovan Farmers Cover

The Influence of Farm Size on Gendered Involvement in Crop Cultivation and Decision-making Responsibility of Moldovan Farmers

Eastern European Countryside
Volume 18 (2012): Issue 2012 (January 2012)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Mar 2013
References

References

  1. Alanan, I. 1995. ‘The family farm ideology, the Baltic countries, and theories of development’.. Vol. 1: 4‒21.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Almas, R., Haugen, M. 1991. ‘Norwegian gender roles in transition: the masculinisation hypothesis in the past and in the future’.Vol. 7: 79-83.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Ashwin, S., ed., 2006.. New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Ashwin, S., ed., 2000.New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Ashwin, S., Lytkina T. 2004. ‘Men in crisis in Russia: the role of domestic marginalisation’.Vol. 18 (2): 189-206.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. BBCNEWS. 2011. Trans-Dniester Profile. 26 December.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Boserup, E., 1970.. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bossen, L., 1989. ‘Women and economic institutions’. In: Plattner, S. (ed.),. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 318-50.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Brandth, B., 2002. ‘Gender identity in European family farming: a literature review’.Vol. 42 (3): 181-200.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Bridger, S., 1996. ‘The return of the family farm: a future for women? ’. In: Marsh, R. (ed.),. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141-54.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Bryceson, D.F. (ed.), 1995.. Oxford: Berg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Burowoy, M., Verdery, K., 1999.. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Burowoy, M., Krotov, P. and T. Lytkina, 2000. ‘Involution and destitution in capitalist Russia’,Vol. 1:43-65.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Burton, M. L., Brudner, L. A. and D. R. White, 1977. ‘A model of the sexual division of labour’.Vol. 4 (2): 227-51.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Burton, M. L., White D. R., 1984. ‘Sexual Division of Labour in Agriculture’.Vol. 86 (3): 568-83.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Chayanov, A.V., 1966.. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Crewe, E., Harrison E., 1998.London: ZXed Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Csillag, P., Elek S. and A. Nemeth. 2002. ‘Family farming in Hungary’.. Vol. 8: 93‒107.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Davison, J. (ed.), 1988.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Dixon, R. B., 1985. ‘Seeing the invisible women farmers in Africa: improving research and data collection methods’. In: Monson J., Kalb, M. (eds.),Los Angeles: UCLA African Studies Center, African Studies Association and OEF International, pp. 19-35.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Guyer, J. I., 1986. ‘Intra-household processes and farming systems research: perspectives from anthropology’. In: Moock J. L. (ed.)Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 92-104.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Hall, A., Mogyorody, V., 2007. ‘Organic farming, gender, and the labour process’.Vol. 72 (2): 289-316.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Hann, C. M., 2001. London, UK: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Henderson, H. K., 1995. ‘Gender division of labour’. In: Henderson, H. K., Hansen, E. (eds.),. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 3-11.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Heyzer, N., 1986.. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Holzner, B.M., 2008. ‘Viewpoint: agrarian restructuring and gender - designing family farms in central and eastern Europe’.Vol. 15 (4): 431-43.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Hudečkova, H., Loštak, M., 1992. ‘The influence of collectivization and decollectivization on the development of rural communities in the Czech Republic’.Vol. 20 (2): 111‒26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Hudečkova, H., Loštak, M., 1995. ‘Social costs of transformation in the Czech agriculture’.. Vol. 1: 81‒90.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Huvio, T., 1998.. FAO Women and Population Division. Available from: http://www/fao.org/WAICWENT/FAOINFO/SUSTDEV? WPdirect/WPan0027.htm, Accessed 23 Oct 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Jha, N., 2004. ‘Gender and decision making in Balinese agriculture’.Vol. 31 (4): 552-72.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Kiblitskaya, M., 2000. ‘Russia’s female breadwinners: the changing subjective experience’. In: Ashwin, S. (ed.),. London: Routledge, pp. 55-70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Kovacs, D., 2008. ‘Rural Issues from the Gender Perspective in the New Democracies During and After Transition’.Vol. 13: 29‒53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Lerman, Z., Cimpoies, D., 2006. ‘Land Consolidation as a Factor for Rural Development in Moldova’,Vol. 58 (no. 3, May): 439‒455.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Lerman, Z., Sutton, W. R., 2008. ‘Productivity and Efficiency of Small and Large Farms in Transition: Evidence from Moldova’.Vol. 24 (no. 2, April/ June): 97‒120.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. MacPhail, F., Bowles, P., 1989. ‘Technical change and intra-household welfare: a case study of irrigated rice production in south Sulawesi, Indonesia’.Vol. 26 (1): 58-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Ministerul Economiei şi Comerţului. 2007. Notă informativă: Sărăcia In Republica. Chisinau, Moldova 2007, Iunie, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Morell, I. A., 2007. ‘Between harmony and conflicting interests: gendered marital negotiations in Hungarian post-socialist farm family enterprises’.Vol. 38 (3): 435-58.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Netting, R. McC. 1993.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Norem, R.H., 1988. ‘Integration of intra-household dynamics into farming systems research and extension: a survey of existing projects’. In: Poats S.V., Schmink, M. and A. Spring (eds.).
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 19-35.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. O’Brien, D. J., Espanol, E., Grigsby, M. and Patsiorkovsky, V., 2011. ‘Entrepreneurial Attitudes in a Post-Communist Rural Economy: The Case of Moldova’.. Vol. 17: 73‒86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. O’Brien, D. J., M. Burress, J. Phillips, co-author and V. Patsiorkovsky, 2009.Columbia, MO.: Division of Applied Social Sciences, University of Missouri.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. O’Brien, D. J., Patsiorkovsky V. and S. K. Wegren, 2008. ‘Household Capital, Sources of Income and Stratification in Rural Russian Villages’.Vol. 14: 27‒42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Pine, F., 1996. ‘Uneven burdens: women in rural Poland’. In: Rai, S., Pilkington, H. and A. Phizacklea (eds.),. NY: Routledge, pp. 57-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Poats, S.V., Schmink, M. and A. Spring, 1988. ‘Linking FSR/E and gender: an introduction’. In: Poats, S. V., Schmink, M. and A. Spring (eds.)Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 1-18.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Quisumbing, A.R., Brown, L. R., Feldstein, H. S., Haddad, L. and C. Peña, 1995. ‘Women: the key to food security’.. Electronic document, http://www.ifpri.org/publication/women-0 accessed 17 Nov 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Rahman, SA, 2008. ‘Women’s involvement in agriculture in Northern and Southern Kaduna State, Nigeria’.Vol. 17 (1): 17-26.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Rona-Tas, A. 1994. ‘The first shall be last? Entrepreneurship and communist cadres in the transition from socialism’.Vol. 100:40‒49.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Rooij, S. de, 1994. ‘Work of the second order’. In: Van de Burg, M., Marina, M. E. (eds.),. Gender Research, EC Policies and New Perspectives Wageningen: Wageningen University, pp. 67-78.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Rossier, R, 2005. ‘Role models and farm development options: a comparison of seven Swiss farm families’., Vol. 36 (Summer): 399-417.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Rotariu, T., Roth, A., 1995. ‘The family farm in Romania today: present and future perspectives’.. Vol. 1: 112‒120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Safiliou-Rotschild, C., 2003. ‘Gender role flexibility and smallholder survival’.Vol. 2 (2): 187-200.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Safiliou-Rotschild, C., Dimopoulou, E., Lagiogianni, R. and S. Sotiropoulou, 2007. ‘Trends of agricultural feminisation in Kastoria, Greece’.. Vol. 38 (3): 409-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Scott, J.C., 1976.. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Shortall, S., 1999.NY: St. Martin’s Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Shortall, S., 2002. ‘Gendered agricultural and rural restructuring: a case study of Northern Ireland’.. Vol. 42 (April): 160-75.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Šikić-Mićanović, L., 2009. ‘Women’s Contribution to Rural Development in Croatia: Roles, Participation and Obstacles’.. Vol. 15: 75‒90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Small, L., 2005. ‘The influence of “family” on agrarian structure: revisiting the family farm debate in Bulgaria and southern Russia’., Vol 36 (3): 489‒503 (15).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Stone, M.P., Stone, G. D. and R. McC, Netting, 1995. ‘The sexual division of labour in Kofyar agriculture’.. Vol. 22 (1): 165-86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Trinh, L. N., Watson, J.W., Hue, N.N. De, Minh, N.V., Chur, P., Sthapit, B. R. and P. B. Eyzaguirre. 2003. ‘Agro-biodiversity conservation and development in Vietnamese home gardens’.. Vol. 97: 317-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Turnock, D. (ed.), 1998.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. USAID. 2006. United States Agency for International Development, Land Privatization Support Project, Private Property Farmlands: Mode of Current Use and Perspectives. Prepared by AGREX, Chisinau, Moldova.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Van Koppen, B., 2000. ‘Gendered water and land rights in Rice Valley Improvement.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. Burkina Faso’. In: Bruns B.R., Meinzen-Dick, R. (eds.),. New Delhi: Vistaar, pp. 83-111.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Watson, P. 1996. ‘The rise of masculinism in Eastern Europe’. In: Threlfall, M. (ed.),London: Verso, pp. 216‒31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Wegren, S. K., Patsiorkovsky, V. and D. J. O’Brien. 2010. ‘Rural Reform and the Gender Gap in Post-Soviet Russia’.Vol. 69 (No. 1, Spring): 27‒42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Whatmore, S. 1991. ‘Life cycle or patriarchy? Gender divisions in family farming’.Vol. 7 (1/2): 71‒6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  68. World Bank. 2005. The World Bank Working Papers, Report # 42141, Moldova- Agricultural Policy Notes: Agricultural Markets. December.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. World Bank. 2006. The World Bank Working Papers, Report # 42142, Moldova- Agricultural Policy Notes: Public Expenditures for Agricultural Development. June.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. World Bank. 2011. Moldova Country Profile. http://www.worldbank.org. December.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10130-012-0002-y | Journal eISSN: 2300-8717 | Journal ISSN: 1232-8855
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 48
Published on: Mar 9, 2013
Published by: Nicolaus Copernicus University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Moldova,
gendered division of labour,
post-socialist economies
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Sociology,
Sociology, other

© 2013 Mary Grigsby, Eloi Español, David J. O’Brien, published by Nicolaus Copernicus University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 18 (2012): Issue 2012 (January 2012)
Previous article
Next article