Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Authority in Lowth’S and Priestley’S Prefaces to Their English Grammars Cover

Authority in Lowth’S and Priestley’S Prefaces to Their English Grammars

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia
Volume 47 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2013
References

References

  1. Baker, Geoff - Ann McGruer (eds.) 2006. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Beal, Joan C. 2004. London: Arnold.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Berry, Margaret - Christopher Butler - Robin Fawcett - Guowen Huang (eds.) 1996. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Cummings, Michael 1995 “A systemic functional approach to the thematic structure of the Old English clause”, in: Ruqaiya Hasan - Peter Howard Fries (eds.), 275-316.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Chiapello, Eve - Norman Fairclough 2002 “Understanding the new management ideology: A transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism”,13/2: 185-208.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Davies, Martin 1996 “Theme and information until Shakespeare”, in: Margaret Berry et al. (eds.), 113-149.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Discenza, Nicole Guenther 2001 “Alfred’s verse preface to theand the chain of authority”,85/4: 625-633.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. . Thomson Gale.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Fairclough, Norman 1995. London: Longman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Fairclough, Norman [1989] 2001. (2edition). London: Longman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood [1985] 2004. (3rd edition). London: Edward Arnold.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Harbus, Antonina 2007 “Metaphors of authority in Alfred’s Prefaces”,91: 717-727.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Hasan, Ruqaiya - Peter Howard Fries (eds.) 1995Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Hickey, Raymond 2010a “Attitudes and concerns in eighteenth-century English”, in: Raymond Hickey (ed.), 1-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Hickey, Raymond (ed.) 2010b. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Hodson, Jane 2008 “Joseph Priestley’s two: 1761 and 1768”, in: Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), 177-189.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Lowth, Robert 1762. London: printed by J. Hughs; for A. Millar and R. & J. Dodsley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Martin, James R. 1992. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Priestley, Joseph 1761. London: printed for R. Griffiths.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Rodríguez-Gil, María Esther 2003 “Ann Fisher, descriptive or prescriptive grammarian?”,17: 183-203.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Straaijer, Robin 2009 “Deontic and epistemic modals as indicators of prescriptive and descriptive language in the grammars by Joseph Priestley and Robert Lowth”, in: Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade - Wurff Wim van der (eds.), 57-87. 2011. Utrecht: LOT.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-012-0013-9 | Journal eISSN: 2082-5102 | Journal ISSN: 0081-6272
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 111
Published on: Mar 27, 2013
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
Literary studies,
Anglo-American literature,
Anglo-American literature, general

© 2013 Dolores Fernández Martínez, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 47 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)
Previous article
Next article