An Integrated Approach to Conventionality and Its Implications for the Semantics of Emotion Terms
Open Access
|Mar 2013References
- Allwood, Jens 2003 “Meaning potentials and context: Some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning”, in: Hubert Cuyckens et al. (eds.), 29-66.
- Cuyckens, Hubert - René Dirven - John Taylor (eds.) 2003Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Boas, Hans C. 2003(Stanford Monographs in Linguistics.) Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information.
- Cameron, Lynne J. 2003. London: Continuum.
- Chłopicki, Władysław - Andrzej Pawelec - Agnieszka Pokojska (eds.) 2007. Kraków: Tertium.
- Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Croft, William 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Deignan, Alice 2005Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Deignan, Alice 2006 “The grammar of linguistic metaphors”, in: Anatol Stefanowitsch - Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), 106-123.
- Dirven, René 2005 “Major strands in Cognitive Linguistics”, in: Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez - Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), 17-68.
- Evans, Vyvyan 2006 “Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction”,17(4): 491-534.
- Evans, Vyvyan - Melanie Green 2006Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Fauconnier, Giles - Mark Turner 2002. New York: Basic Books.
- Fillmore, Charles J. 1985 “Frames and the semantics of understanding”,6: 222- 254.
- Frijda, Nico H. 1986. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Geeraerts, Dirk 2003 “Decontextualizing and recontextualizing tendencies in 20th century linguistics and literary theory”, in: Ewald Mengel et al. (eds.), 369-379. 2006 “Introduction: A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics”, in: Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), 1-28.
- Geeraerts, Dirk (ed.) 2006. Berlin - New York: Mounton de Gruyter.
- Goldberg, Adele E. 1995Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Giora, Rachel 1999 “On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language”,31/7: 919-929.
- Glynn, Dylan 2004 “Constructions at the crossroads: the place of construction grammar between field and frame”,2: 197-233.
- Haiman, John 1980 “Dictionaries and encyclopedias”,50: 329-357.
- Hampe, Beate - Joseph E. Grady (eds.) 2005Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Hanks, Patrick 2006 “Metaphoricity is gradable”, in: Anatol Stefanowitsch - Stefan Th. Gries (eds.),17-36.
- Hudson, Richard 2008 “Word grammar and construction grammar”, in: Graeme Trousdale - Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), 257-302.
- Kövecses, Zoltán 2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lakoff, George 1987. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, George - Mark Johnson. 1980. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1987grammar. Vol. 1:Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 2005 “Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so”, in: Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez - Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), 101-159. 2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- McRae, Kenneth J.- Michael Spivey-Knowlton - Michael K. Tanenhaus 1998 “Modelling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension”,38: 283-312.
- Mengel, Ewald - Hans-Jorg Schmid - Michael Steppard (eds.) 2003Trier: Wissenschaftliger Verlag.
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. - Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.) 2005(Cognitive Linguistics Research 32.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Solomon, Robert C. 1976New York: Doubleday Anchor.
- Steen, Gerard J. 2002 “Metaphor identification: A cognitive approach”,36/3: 386-407. 2007. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Stefanowitsch, Anatol 2006 “Words and their metaphors: A Corpus-based approach”, in: Anatol Stefanowitsch - Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), 63-105.
- Stefanowitsch, Anatol - Stefan Th. Gries 2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions”,8/2: 209-243.
- Stefanowitsch, Anatol - Stefan Th. Gries (eds.) 2006. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter.
- Stern, Josef 2000. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Strugielska, Ariadna 2010 “Metafora konceptualna - między kategorią klasyczną a modelem potocznym”, in: Zdzisław Wąsik - Aleksandra Wach (eds.), 109-121.
- Szwedek, Aleksander 2007 “Polysemy and metaphorization”, in: Władysław Chłopicki et al. (eds.), 255-272.
- Taylor, John 2002Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Trousdale, Graeme - Nikolas Gisborne (eds.) 2008. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Vandeloise, Claude 1994. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Wąsik, Zdzisław - Aleksandra Wach (eds.) 2010. Poznań: Instytut Filologii Angielskiej UAM.
- Zlatev, Jordan 2005 “What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language”, in: Beate Hampe - Joseph E. Grady (eds.), 313-342.
- BNC:[Available at: http:// www.view.byu.edu ED 01.2011].
- Kemmer, Suzanne 2005 “Constructional profiles as the basis of semantic analysis”, [Paper read at the Converging and Diverging Trends in Cognitive Linguistics conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 17-18 October. Available at: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/DUB3.ppt].
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 46
Published on: Mar 27, 2013
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2013 Ariadna Strugielska, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.