Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The impact of neighbourhood and gap character on seedling recruitment of Trollius europaeus L. and Iris sibirica L. in Molinietum caeruleae meadows Cover

The impact of neighbourhood and gap character on seedling recruitment of Trollius europaeus L. and Iris sibirica L. in Molinietum caeruleae meadows

Biodiversity Research and Conservation
Volume 28 (2012): Issue 2012 (December 2012)
By:   
Open Access
|Feb 2013
References

References

  1. Auguilera M. O. & Laurenroth W. K. 1993. Seedling establishment in adults neighbourhood-intraspecific constraints in the regeneration of the bunchgrass. J. Ecol. 81(2): 253-261.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Benkert D. & Klemm G. (eds.). 1993. Rote Liste Farn- und Blütenpflanzen im Land Brandenburg. In: Ministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Raumordnung des Landes Brandenburg. Gefährdete Farn- und Blütenpflanzen, Algen und Pilze im Land Brandenburg, pp. 7-95, Unze Verlag, Potsdam.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Cheffings C. & Farrell L. (eds.). 2005. The Vascular Plant Red Data List for Great Britain. Species Status7: 1-166. Joint Nature Conservation Commitee Petrborough
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Chess er J. D. & Brewer J. S. 2011. Factors influencing seedling recruitment in a critically endangered pitcher plant,ssp.. Endang. Species Res. 13: 245-252.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Chien P. D., Zuidema P. A. & Nghia N. H. 2008. Conservationprospects for threatened Vietnamese tree species: results from a demographic study. Popul. Ecol. 50: 227-237.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Coops H. & Van Der Veld e G. 1995. Seed dispersal, germination and seedling growth of six helophyte species in relation to water-level zonation. Freshwater Biology 34(1): 13-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Curtis T. G. F. & McGough H. N. 1988. The Irish Red Data Book, 1, pp. 168. Vascular Plants. Wildlife Service Ireland, Dublin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Dinsdale J. M., Dale M. P. & Kent M. 2000. Microhabitat availability and seedling recruitment of: a rare plant species at its geographical limit. Seed Science Research 10: 471-487.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Dorland E., Bobbink R., Messelink J. H. & Verhoeven J. T. A. 2003. Soil ammonium accumulation after sod cutting hampers the restoration of degraded wet heatlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 804-814.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Dubiel E. 1991. Map of actual vegetation of the city of Cracow. Zesz. Nauk. UJ. Prace Botaniczne 22: 121-133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Dubiel E. 1996. Łąki Krakowa. I KlasaStudia Ośrodka Dokumentacji Fizjograficznej 24: 145-171.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Eriksson O. 1989. Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants. Oikos 55(2): 231-238.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Eriksson O. 1995. Seedling recruitment in deciduous forests herbs: effect of litter, soil chemistry and seed bank. Flora 190: 65-70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Falińska K. 1986. Demography ofL. populations in abandoned meadows. Ekol. Pol. 34(4): 583-613.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Forbis T. A. 2003. Seedling demography in an alpine ecosystem. Am. J. Bot. 90: 1197-1206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Forbis T. A. & Doak D. F. 2004. Seedling establishment and life history trade-offs in alpine plants. Am. J. Bot. 91(7): 1147-1153.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Głowacki Z., Falkowski M., Krechowski J., Marciniuk J., Marciniuk P., Nowicka-Fal kowska K. & Wierzba M. 2003. Czerwona lista roślin naczyniowych Niziny Południowopodlaskiej. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 59(2): 5-41.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Gulias J., Traveset A., Riera N. & Mus M. 2004. Critical Stages in the Recruitment Process ofL. Ann. Bot. 93 (6): 723-731
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Hitchmough J. D. 2003. Effects of sward height, gap size, and slug grazing on emergence and establishment of(Globeflower). Restoration Ecology 11(1): 20-28.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Hölzel N. 2005. Seedling recruitment in flood-meadow species: The effects of gaps, litter and vegetation matrix. Appl. Veg. Sci. 8: 115-224.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Ingelög T., Andersson R. & Tjenberg M. 1993. Red Data Book of The Baltic Region. Part 1, Lists of threatened vascular plants and vertebrates, 95 pp. Swedish ThreatenedSpecies Unit, Uppsala, Institute of Biology,Riga.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Jackowiak B., Celka Z., Chm iel J., Latowski K. & Żukowski W. 2007. Red list of vascular flora in Wielkopolska (Poland). Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 5-8: 95-127.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Kącki Z. 2002. Kosaciec syberyjskiL. In: A. Nowak & K. Spałek. (eds.) Czerwona Księga Roślin Województwa Opolskiego, pp. 46. OTPN, Opole.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Kącki Z., Dajdok Z. & Szczęśniak E. 2003. Czerwona lista roślin naczyniowych Dolnego Śląska. In: Z. Kącki (ed.) Zagrożone gatunki flory naczyniowej Dolnego Śląska. pp. 9-65. Instytut Biologii Roślin UWr, PTPP “pro Natura” Wrocław.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Kostrakiewicz K. 2007. The effect of dominant species on numbers and age structure ofL. population on blue moor-grass meadow in southern Poland. Acta Bot. Soc. Pol. 76(2): 165-173.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kostrakiewicz K. 2010. Wpływ luk na rekrutację siewek ginących gatunków w płatach łąk trzęślicowychW. Koch 1926. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 66(3): 184-189.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Kotowski W., van Andel J., van Diggelen R. & Hogendorf J. 2001. Responses of plant species to groundwater level and light intensity. Plant Ecol. 155: 147-156. http://dx.doi.org./10.1023/A:1013214716842
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Kotowski W. & van Diggelen R. 2004. Light as an environmental filter in fen vegetation. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 583-594.doi: http://dx.doi.org./10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02300.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Křenová Z. & Lepš J. 1996. Regeneration of apopulation in an oligotrophic wet meadow. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 107-112.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Lenss en J. P. M., ten Doll e G. E. & Blom C. W. P. M. 1988. The effect of flooding on the recruitment of reed marsh and tall forb plant species. Plant Ecol. 139(1): 13-23.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Levine J. M. & D. J. Murrell. 2003. The community-level consequences of seed dispersal patterns. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 549-574.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Liu G., Mao P., Wang Y. & Han J. 2008. Effects of adult neighbour and gap size on seedling emergence and early growth ofLeyss. Ecol. Res. 23(1): 197-205.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Markowski R. S. & Buliński M. 2004. Ginące i zagrożone rośliny Pomorza Gdańskiego. Acta Bot. Cassub., Monographiae 1: 1-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Matuszkiewicz W. 2001. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. In: J. B. Faliński (ed.). Vademecum Geobotanicum 3, 537 pp. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Milb erg P. 1994. Germination ecology of the polycarpic grassland perennialsand. Ecography 17(1): 3-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Morgan J. W. 1997. The Effect of Grassland Gap Size on Establishment, Growth and Flowering of the Endangered(Asteraceae). J. Appl. Ecol. 34(3): 566-576.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Morgan J. W. 1998. Importance of Canopy Gaps for Recruitment of some Forbs in-dominated Grasslands in South-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 46: 609-627.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Moser D.M., Gygax A., Bäumler B., Wyler N. & Palese R. 2002. Rote Liste der gefährdeten Farn- und Blütenpflanzen der Schweiz. 118 pp. Hrsg. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, Bern, Zentrum des Datenverbundnetzes der Schweizer Flora, Chambésy, Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Chambésy. BUWAL-Reihe “Vollzug Umwelt“.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Muncaciu S., Gafta D., Cristea V., Rosca-Cas ian O. & Goia I. 2010. Eco-coenotic conditions and structure ofL. populations in an extrazonal habitat complex (Transsylvanian Carpathian foothills). Flora 205: 711-720.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Nowak A. 2002. Pełnik europejskiL. In: A.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Nowak A. & K. Spałek (ed.). Czerwona Księga Roślin Województwa Opolskiego, p. 90. OTPN, Opole.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Okruszko H. 1995. Influence of hydrological differentiation of fens on theit transformation after dehydration and on possibilities for restoration. In: B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, W. J. Fojt & R. A. Robertson (eds.) Restoration of Temperate Wetlands, pp. 113-119. Wiley Chichester.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Olszewski T. S. & Markowski R. 2006. Addenda to the red list of vascular plants of Gdańsk Pomerania 2. In: T. S. Ols zewski, R. Afranowicz & K. Bociąg (eds.). Contemporary trends of botanical research - on professor Hanna
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Piotrowska 80th Birthday anniversary. Acta Bot. Cassub. 6: 163-172. Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 05 January2012 on wild species of plants under protection. Journal of Laws No 0 (2012), item 168.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Sačanka B. Í. 1993. Čyrvonaja Knìga Rèspubliki Belarus’. Rèdkìja ì tyja, što znachodzjacca pad pagrozaj znìknennja vidy žyvjol ì raslìn. 560 pp. Belaruskaja éncyklapedyja ìmija P. Brojkì, Mìnsk.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. State Institute for Nature Protection 2004. Red list of threatened plants and animals of Republic of Croatia. 114 pp. Drž`avni zavod za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Witkowski Z. W., Król W. & Solorz W. (eds.). 2003. Carpathian List of Endangered Species. 64 pp. WWF and Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Vienna-Krakow.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Wright S. J. 2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130: 1-14.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Zarzycki K. & Szeląg Z. 2006. Red list of the vascular plants in Poland. In: Z. Mirek, K. Zarzycki, W. Wojewoda & Z. Szeląg (eds.). Red list of plants and fungi in Poland, pp. 9-20. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Zhang Z. Q., Shu W. S., Lan C. Y. & Wong M. H. 2001. Soil Seed Bank as an Input of Seed Source in Revegetation of Lead/Zinc Mine Tailings. Restoration. Ecology 9(4): 378-385.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Zoltan R. (Szerkeztette), Bankovics A., Györyj J., Kaszab Z., Nechay G., Nemeth F., Papp J., Rajczy M., Rakonczay Z., Sterbetz I., Trmedi I. & Varga Z. 1990. Vörös könyv. A. magyarországon kipusztult ésveszélyeztetett növény-és állatfajok. 360 pp. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-012-0026-1 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 44
Published on: Feb 26, 2013
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
active protection,
endangered plants,
gaps,
Iris sibirica,
Molinietum caeruleae,
recruitment,
seedlings,
Trollius europaeus
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2013 Kinga Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 28 (2012): Issue 2012 (December 2012)
Previous article
Next article