Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Genetic Diversity of Leafy Liverwort Species (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta) in Poland: Diversity of Leafy Liverwort Species with Various Reproductive Modes Cover

Genetic Diversity of Leafy Liverwort Species (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta) in Poland: Diversity of Leafy Liverwort Species with Various Reproductive Modes

Biodiversity Research and Conservation
Volume 27 (2012): Issue 2012 (September 2012)
By:   
Open Access
|Feb 2013
References

References

  1. Adamczak M., Buczkowska K., Bączkiewicz A. & Wachowiak W. 2005. Comparison of allozyme variability in Polish populations of two species ofNees (Hepaticae) with contrasting degrees of sexual reproduction. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 26(2): 151-165.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Anderson L. E. 1963. Modern species concepts: Moses. Bryologist 66: 107-119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Anderson L. E. 1980. Cytology and reproductive biology of mosses. In: R. J. Taylor & A. E. Leviton (eds.). The mosses of North America, pp. 37-76. Pacific Division of the American Association of the Advancement of Science, San Francisco.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Akiyama H. & Hiraoka T. 1994. Allozyme variability within and Divergence among populations of the liverwort(Marchantiales: Hepaticae) in Japan. J. Plant Res. 107: 307-320.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Bączkiewicz A. & Buczkowska K. 2005. Genetic variability of thecomplex (Hepaticae) in central and western Europe. Biol. Letters 42(1): 61-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bączkiewicz A. & Buczkowska K. 2006. Genetic variation ofpopulations from manager forests in Poland. In: P. Kočárek, V. Plášek & K. Mala chová (eds.). Environmental Changes and Biological Assessment III. Scripta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Ostraviensis 163: 108-113.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bengtsson B. O. 2003. Genetic variation in organisms with sexual and asexual reproduction. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 189-199.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Bisang I. & Hedennäs L. 2005. Sex ratio patterns in dioecious bryophytes revisited. J. Bryol. 7: 207-219.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Bischler H. & Boisselier-Duba yle M. C. 1997. Population Genetics and Variation in Liverworts. Advances in Bryology 6: 1-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Boisselier-Dubayle M. C. & Bischler H. 1997. Enzyme polymorphism in(Hepaticae, Marchantiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 205: 73-84.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Boisselier-Dubayle M. C., Jubier M.F., Lejeune B. & Bischler H. 1995. Genetic variability in the three subspecies of(Hepaticae): isozymes, RFLP and RAPD markers. Taxon 44: 363-376.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Boisselier-Dubayle M. C., Lambourdiere J. & Bischler H. 1998a. Taxa delimitation ininvestigated with morphological, cytological, and isozyme markers. Bryologist 101: 61-69.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Boisselier-Dubayle M. C., Lambourdiere J. & Bischler H. 1998b. The leafy liverwort(Porellaceae) is an allopolyploid. Pl. Syst. Evol. 210: 175-197.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Bowker M. A., Stark L. R. McLetchie D. N. & Mishler B. D. 2000. Sex expression, skwed sex ratios, and microhabitat distribution in the dioecious desert moss(Pottiaceae). Am. J. Bot 87: 517-526.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Buczkowska K. 2004. Genetic differentiation ofRaddi (Hepaticae, Jungermanniales) in Poland.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Pl. Syst. Evol. 247:187-201.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Buczkowska K., Sawicki J., Szczecińska M., Klama H., Milewicz M. & Bączkiewicz A. 2010. Genetic variation in liverwortinferred from ISSR markers. J. Bryol. 32: 265-274.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Cromberg N. 1996. Isozyme evidence of relationships withinsect.Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta). Pl. Syst. Evol. 203: 41-64.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Cromberg N. 1998. Population structure and interspecific differentiation of the peat moss sister speciesand() in northern Europe. Pl. Syst. Evol. 209: 139-158.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Cromberg N. 2000a. Absence of variation in populations of the liverwortfrom northern Greece and southern Scandinavia. Lidbergia 25: 20-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Cromberg N. 2000b. Genetic diversity of the epiphyticin formerly glaciated versus nonglaciated parts of Europe. Heredity 84: 710-720.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Cromberg N. 2002. Colonization dynamics of the clonal mosson Islands in a Balticland uplift area: reproduction, genet distribution and genetic variation. J. Ecol. 90:925-935.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Cromberg N., Anderson K., Wyatt R. & Odrzykoski I. J. 2003. Clonal distribution, fertility and sex ratios of the moss(Bland.) T. Kop. In forest of contrasting age. J. Bryol. 25: 55-162.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Cromberg N., Mola u U. & Sonesson M. 1997. Genetic variability in the clonal bryophyteat hierarchical geographical scales in Scandinavia. Heredity 78: 293-301.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Crum H. 1972. The geographic origin of the mosses of North America’s eastern deciduous forest. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 35: 269-298.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Damsholt K. 2002. Illustrated Flora of Nordic Liverworts and Hornworts. 837 pp. Nordic Bryol. Soc., Lund.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Dewey R. M. 1989. Genetic variation in the liverwort(Ricciaceae, Hepaticopsida). Syst. Bot. 14(2): 155-167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. During H. J. 1990. Clonal growth patterns among bryophytes. In: J. von Groenendael & H. de Kroon H. (eds.). Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function, pp.153-176. SPB Acadenic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. During H. J., Brugues M., Cros R. M. & Lloret F. 1988. The diaspore bank of bryophytes and ferns in the soil in some contrasting habitats around Barcelona, Spain. Lindbergia 13: 137-149.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Eckert C. G. 2002. The loss of sex in clonal plants. Evol. Ecol. 15: 501-520.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Eckert C. G. & Barrett S. C. H. 1993. Clonal reproduction and patterns of genotypic diversity in(Lythraceae). Am. J. Bot. 80:1175-1182.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Ellstrand N. C. & Roose M. L. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am. J. Bot. 74: 123-131.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Eppley S. M., Taylor P. J. & Jesson L. K. 2006. Self-fertilization in mosses: a comparison of heterozygote deficiency between species with combined versus separate sexes. Heredity (2006): 1-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Fager E. W. 1972. Diversity: a sampling study. Am. Nat. 106: 293-310.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Freitas H. & Brehm A. 2001. Genetic diversity of the Macaronesian leafy liverwortinferred from RAPD markers. Am. Genet. Assoc. 92: 339-345.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Gemmell A. R. 1950. Studies in the bryophyte I. The influence of sexual mechanism on varietal production and distribution of British music. New Phytol. 49: 64-71.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Gottlieb L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Progress in Phytochem.7: 1-46.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Grundmann M., Ansell S. W., Russell S. J., Koch M. A. & Vogel J. C. 2007. Genetic structure of the widespread and common Maditerranean bryophyte(Brid.) Lindb. (Pottiaceae) - evidence from nuclear and plastidic DNA sequence variation and allozymes. Mol. Ecol. 16: 709-722.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Hamrick J. L. & Godt M. J. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler & B. S. Weir (eds.). Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources, pp. 3-63. Sunderland: Sinauer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Heinrichs J., Hentschel J., Wilson R., Feldberg K. & Schneider H. 2007.Evolution of leafy liverworts (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta): estimating divergence times from chloroplast DNA sequences using penalized likelihood with integrated fossil evidence. Taxon 56(1): 31-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Hewitt G. M. 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 247-112.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Hock Zs., Szövényi P., Schneller J. J., Tóth Z. & Urmi E. 2008a. Bryophyte diaspore bank: a genetic memory? Genetic structure and genetic diversity of surface populations and diaspore bank in the(Antoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 95(5): 542-548.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Hock Zs., Szövényi P., Schneller J. J., Urmi E. &, Tóth Z. 2008b. Are sexual or asexual events determining the genetic structure of populations in the liverwort? J. Bryol. 30: 66-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Hock Zs., Szövényi P., Schnell er J. J., Urmi E. &Tóth Z. 2009. Population genetic consequences of the reproductive system in the liverwort. Pl. Ecol. 202: 123-134.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Innes D. J. 1990. Microgeographic genetic variation in the haploid and diploid stages of the mossHedw. Heredity 64: 331-340.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Itouga M., Yamaguchi T. & Deguchi H. 1999. Allozyme variability within and among populations in the liverwort(Marchantiales, Hepaticae). Hikobia 13: 89-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Itouga M., Yamaguchi T. & Deguchi H. 2002. Allozyme variability within and among population in the Asian liverworts. J. Bryol. 24: 267-276.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Jendralski U. 1955. Die Jahresperiodizität der Entwicklung der Laubmoose im Rheinlande. Decheniana 108: 105-163.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Jonsson B. G. 1993. The bryophyte diaspore bank and role after small-scale disturbance in a boreal forest. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 819-826.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Kim H. N., Haraha K. & Yamazaki T. 1996. Isozyme polymorphism and genetic structure of a liverwortin natural populations of Japan. Genes Genet. Syst. 71: 225-235.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Kimura M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217:624-626.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Kimura M. & Ohta T. 1971. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature 229: 467-469.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Klama H. 2002. Distribution patterns of liverworts (Marchantiopsida) in natural forest communities (Białowieża Primeval Forest, NE Poland). 278 pp. Bielsko-Biała University press, Bielsko-Biała.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Klekowski E. J. J. 1988a. Mutation, Developmental Selection and Plant Evolution. 373 pp. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Klekowski E. J. J. 1988b. Progressive cross- and self-sterility associated with aging in fern clones and perhaps other plants. Heredity 61: 247-253.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Korpelainen H., Pohjamo M. & Laa ka-Lindberg S. 2005. How efficiently does bryophyte dispersal lead to gene flow? J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 97: 195-205.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Krzakowa M. & Szweykowski J. 1979. Isozyme polymorphism in natural populations of a liverwort,. Genetics 93: 711-719.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Lane D. M. 1985. A quantitative study of the mosses of eastern North America. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 11: 45-50.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Lienert J. 2004. Habitat fragmentation effects on fitness of plant populations - a review. J. Nat. Conser. 12: 53-72.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Longton R. E. 1976. Reproductive biology and evolutionary potential in bryophytes. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 41: 205-223.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Longton R. E. 1997. Reproductive biology and life-history strategies. In: J. Cramer (ed.). Advances in Bryol. Vol 6, pp. 65-101. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Longton R. E. & Miles C. J. 1982. Studies on the reproductive biology of mosses. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 52: 219-240.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Longton R. E. & Schuster R. M. 1983. Reproductive biology.In: R. M. Schuster (ed.). New manual of Bryology, vol.1, chapter 9, pp. 386-462. Hattori Bot. Lab. Nichinan, Japan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Manly B. F. J. 1985. The Statistics of Natural Selection on Animal Populations, pp. 272-282. Chapman and Hall, London.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  65. McDermott J. M. & McDonal d B. A. 1993. Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31: 353-373.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  66. McLetchie D. N. 1996. Sperm limitation and genetic effects on fecundity in the dioecious liverwort. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9: 87-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  67. McLetchie D. N., Garcia-Ramos G. & Crowley P. H. 2002. Local sex-ratio dynamics: a model for the dioecious liverwort. Evol. Ecol. 15:231-254.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  68. Miles C. J. & Longton R. E. 1992. Deposition of moss spores in relation to distance from parent gametophytes. J. Bryol. 17: 355-368.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  69. Mischler B. D. 1988. Reproductive Ecology of Bryophytes. In: J. Lovett Doust & L. Lovett Doust L. (eds.). Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Montagnes R. J. S., Bayer R. J. & Vitt D. H. 1993. Isozyme variation in the moss(Meesiaceae). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 74: 155-170.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Moya M. T. 1993. Genetic variation inL. (Hepatophyta, Marchantiaceae) in Peurto Rico. Master thesis, University of Peurto Rico. Mayagüez.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Müller K. 1951-1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. Rabenhorst‘s Kryptogamen Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich u. d. Schweiz. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig K.-G. Leipzig, pp. 631-635.
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 238-292.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  74. Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of ScienceUSA 70: 3321-3323.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  75. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  76. Newton A. E. & Mishler B. D. 1994. The evolutionary significance of sexual reproduction in mosses. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 76: 127-145.
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Odrzykoski I. J. 1986. Genetic structure of natural populations of. PhD. Thesis Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Odrzykoski I. J. & Szweykowski J. 1991. Genetic differentiation without concordant morphological divergence in the thallose liverwort. Pl. Syst. Evol178: 135-151.
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. Paton J. A. 1999. The Liverwort Flora of the British Isles. Harley Books, Martins.
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Peakall R. & Smouse P. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Exel. Population genetic softwere for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  81. Pielou E. C. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. 286 pp. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. Pohjamo M., Korpela inen H. & Kal inauskaite N. 2008. Restricted gene flow in the clonal hepaticin fragmented landscapes. Biol. Conservation 141: 1204-1217.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  83. Roads E. & Longton R. F. 2003. Reproductive biology and population studies in two annual shuttle mosses. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 93: 305-318.
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. Schuster R. M. 1966. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America. Vol. 1, 802 pp. Columbia University Press, New York and London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  85. Schuster R. M. 1969. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America. Vol. 2, 1062 pp. Columbia University Press, New York and London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  86. Shaw A. J. 2000. Population ecology, population genetics, and microevolution. In: A. J. Shaw & B. Goff inet (eds.). Bryophyte Biology, pp. 369-402. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  87. Shaw A. J. & Srodon M. 1995. Clonal diversity inWils. Bryologist 98: 261-264.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  88. Skotnicki M. L., Ninham J. A. & Selkirk P. M. 1999. Genetic diversity and dispersal of the mosson Ross Island, East Antarctica. Mol. Ecol. 8: 753-762.
    Search in Google Scholar
  89. Slatkin M. 1985. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39: 53-65.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  90. Snäll T., Ehrlén J. & Rydin H. 2005. Colonization-extinction dynamics in patch-tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal. Oikos 103:566-578.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  91. Spagnuolo V., Muscariell o L., Cozzolino S., Cobianchi R. C. & Giordano S. 2007. Ubiquitous genetic diversity in ISSR markers between and within populations of the asexually producing moss. Plant Ecol. 188: 91-101.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  92. StatSoft , INC , 2008. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0.www.ststsoft.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  93. Stenøien H. K. 1999. Are enzyme loci selectively neutral in haploid populations of nonvascular plants? Evolution 53(4): 1050-1059.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  94. Stenøien H. K. & Såsta d S. 1999. Genetic structure in three haploid peat mosses (Sphagnum). Heredity 82: 391-400.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  95. Stenøien H. K. & Såsta d S. 2001. Genetic variability in bryophytes: does mating system really matter? J. Bryol. 23: 313-318.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  96. Stoneburner A. R., Wyatt R. & Odrzykoski I. J. 1991. Applications of enzyme electrophoresis to bryophyte systematic and population biology. Advances in Bryology 4:1-27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  97. Szweykowski J. 1984. What do we know about the evolutionary process in bryophytes? J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 55: 209-218.
    Search in Google Scholar
  98. Szweykowski J. 2006. An annotated checklist of Polish liverworts and hornworts. In: Z. Mirek (ed.). Biodiversity of Poland, 4, 114 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  99. Szweykowski J. & Buczkowska K. 1996. Liverworts of Bieszczady Zachodnie Range (Polish Eastern Carpathians) - a vanishing relict boreal flora. Fragm. Flor. Geobot 41(2): 865-934.
    Search in Google Scholar
  100. Szweykowski J. & Buczkowska K. 2000.hummocks - a bryologically neglected plant formation. Fragm. Flor. Geobot 45: 475-484.
    Search in Google Scholar
  101. Szweykowski J. & Odrzykoski I. J. 1990. Chemical differentiation of(L.) Dum. (HepaticaeAneuraceae) in Poland and some comments on applicationof enzymatic markers in bryology. In: H. D. Zinsmeister & R. Mues (eds.). Bryophytes Their Chemistry and Chemical Taxonomy, pp. 437-448. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  102. Thingsgaa rd K. 2001. Population structure and genetic diversity of the amphiatlantic haploid peatmoss(Sphagnopsida). Heredity 87: 485-496.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  103. Van der Velde M. & Bijlsma R. 2000. Amount and structure of intra- and interspecific genetic variation in the moss genus. Heredity 85:328-337.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  104. Van der Velde M. & Bijlsma R. 2003. Phylogeography of fivespecies within Europe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 78: 203-213.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  105. Van der Velde M., Van de Zande L. & Bijlsma R. 2001. Genetic structur ofin relation to the breeding system as revealed by microsatellites. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 288-295.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  106. Wachowiak-Zielińska M. & Zieliński R. 1995. Genetic variation of the haploid moss(Musci, Hylocomiaceae) from Poland. Fragm. Flor. Geobot 40(1): 417-423.
    Search in Google Scholar
  107. Wendel J. F. & Weeden N. F. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: D. E. Solt is & P. S. Solt is (eds.). Isozymes in Plant Biology, pp. 5-45. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  108. Wolf A. T., Howe R. W. & Hamrick J. L. 2000. Genetic diversity and population structure oft the serpentine endemic(Convolvulaceae) in northern California. Am. J. Bot. 87: 1138-1146.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  109. Wyatt R. 1985. Terminology for bryophyte sexuality: Toward a unified system. Taxon 34: 420-425.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  110. Wyatt R. 1992. Conservation of rare and endangered bryophytes: input from population genetics. Biol. Conserv. 59;99-107.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  111. Wyatt R. 1994. Population genetics of bryophytes in relation to their reproductive biology. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 76: 147-157.
    Search in Google Scholar
  112. Wyatt R., Odrzykoski I. J. & Cromberg N. 2005. High levels of genetic variation in the haploid leafy liverwortfrom the southeastern United States. J. Bryol. 27: 247-252.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  113. Wyatt R., Odrzykoski I. J. & Stonenburner A. 1989a. Bryophyte isozymes: systematic and evolutionary implications. In: D. E. Soltis & P. S. Soltis (eds.). Isozymes in Plant Biologypp. 221-240. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  114. Wyatt R., Odrzykoski I. J. & Stonenburner A. 1989b. High level of genetic variability in the haploid moss. Evolution 43: 1085-1096.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  115. Wyatt R., Odrzykoski I. J. & Stonenburner A. 1992. Isozymes evidence of reticulate evolution in mosses:is an allopolyploid of×. Syst. Bot. 17(4): 532-550.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  116. Wyatt R., Odrzykoski I. J. & Stonenburner A. 1993. Isozymes evidence regarding the origins of the allopolyploid moss. Lindbergia 18: 49-58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  117. Yeh F., Yang R. C., Boyle t., Ye Z. & Mao J. X. 2000. POPGEN version 1.32: A free program for the analysis of genetic variation among and within populations using co-dominant and dominant markers. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre University of Alberta. Canada.
    Search in Google Scholar
  118. Zhu Y.-Q., Liu L., Wang Y.-F. & Shao X.-M. 2007. Genetic diversity and population structure ofSchimp. (Brchytheciaceae) from Foping Nature Reserve, Shaanxi, China, detected by RAPD markers. J. Bryol. 29:104-110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  119. Zieliński R. 1984. Electrophoretic and cytological study of theandcomplex. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 56: 263-269.
    Search in Google Scholar
  120. Zieliński R. 1987. Genetic variation of the liverwort genuswith reference to Central European territory pp. 297. Szczeciński University, Szczecin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  121. Zieliński R., Szwykowski J. & Rutkowska E. 1985. A further electrophoretic study of peroxidase isozyme variation in(L.) Dum. from Poland, with special reference to the status ofLorbeer. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 11: 199-209.
    Search in Google Scholar
  122. Zieliński R. & Wachowiak-Zielińska M. 1994. Isoenzyme variation in Polish populations ofand(Hepaticae, Plagiochilaceae). Frag. Flor. Geobot. 39:503-509.
    Search in Google Scholar
  123. Zukerkandl E. & Pauling L. 1965. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V., Vogel H.J. (eds.). Evolving genes and proteins, pp. 97-166. Academic Press, New York.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-012-0022-5 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 54
Published on: Feb 13, 2013
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Bryophyta,
Bazzania trilobata,
Trichocolea tomentella,
Lophozia hatcheri,
Mylia anomala,
Lepidozia reptans,
Calypogeia integristipula,
Mylia taylorii,
Tritomaria quinquedentata,
genetic variation,
population genetics,
sterile and fertile species,
population differentiation,
breeding system,
monoecious,
dioecious
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2013 Alina Bączkiewicz, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 27 (2012): Issue 2012 (September 2012)
Next article