Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Isoenzyme variation and genetic affinities among four species of the genus Festuca L. (Poaceae) Cover

Isoenzyme variation and genetic affinities among four species of the genus Festuca L. (Poaceae)

Biodiversity Research and Conservation
Volume 28 (2012): Issue 2012 (December 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Feb 2013
References

References

  1. Achtarov B. 1953. Die GattungL. (Schwingel) in Bulgarien. Bulletin L′Institut botanique 3: 1-89.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Aiken S., Consaul L., Davis J. & Manos P. 1993. Systematic inferences from variation in isoenzyme profiles of arctic and alpine cespitose(Poaceae). Am. J. Bot80: 76-82.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Aiken S., Spidle A. & May B. 1994. Allozyme and morphological observations oncompared withand(Poaceae) from Canadian Arctic. Nord. J. Bot14: 137-143.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Aiken S. & Lefkovitch L. 1995.(Poaceae), a high Arctic, new species compared enzymatically and morphologically with similarspecies. Syst. Bot20: 374-392.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Angelov G. 1986. Biosystematic study of natural populations of Bulgarian species from genus Vlasatka (L.), Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Botany, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Angelov G., Edreva A. & Kozuharov S. 1988. Biosystematic study on species of genusL. I. Chromatographic analysis of polyphenolic compounds. Fitologija 35: 3-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Angelov G. & Kozuharov S. 1997. An electrophoretic study of(Hack.) K. Richt. and(Acht.) Koz. Phytol. Balc. 3: 71-77.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bayer R. 1988. Patterns of isoenzyme variation in Western North American(Asteraceae: Inuleae). I. Sexual species of section Dioicae. Syst. Bot. 13: 525-537.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Brown A. & Munday J. 1982. Population genetic structure and optimal sampling of land races of barley form Iran. Genetica 58: 85-96.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Camm erts D & Jacobs M. 1983. A study of the polymorphism and the genetic control of the glutamate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in. Pl. Sci. Lett. 31: 65-71.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Crawford D. & Smith E. 1984. Allozyme divergence and intraspecific variation in(Compositae). Syst. Bot. 9: 219-225.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Davis B. 1964. Disc electrophoresis. I. Method and application to human serum proteins. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 121: 404-427.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Davis J. & Manos D. 1991. Isozyme variation and species delimitation in the(Poaceae) complex: an application of the phylogenetic species concept. Syst. Bot16: 443-445
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Davis J. & Goldman D. 1993. Isozyme variation and species delimitation among diploid populations of thecomplex (Poaceae): character fixation and the discovery of phylogenetic species. Taxon 42: 585-599.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Figueiras D., Gonsal es-Jaen M., Sal inas J. & Benito S. 1984. Association of isozymes with a reciprocal translocation in cultivated rye (). Genetics 109: 177-193.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Foggi B., Scholz H. & Vald és B. 2005. The Euro+Med treatment of(Gramineae) - new names and new combinations inand allied genera. Willdenowia 35: 241-244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Goodman M., Stuber C., Lee C. & Johnson F. 1980. Genetic control of malate dehydrogenase in maize. Genetics 94: 153-168.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Gottlieb L. 1977. Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard64: 161-180.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Gottlieb L. 1982. Conservation and duplication of isozymes in plants. Science 218: 373-380.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Guldahl A., Borgen L. & Nordal I. 2001. Variation in the(Poaceae) complex in Svalbard, elucidated by chromosome numbers and isozymes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 137: 107-126.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Hackel E. 1882. Monographia Festucarum Europaearum. 216 pp. T. Fischer, Kassel.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Hamrick J. & Godt M. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Cleg, A. L. Kahler & B. Weir (eds.). Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resourses. pp. 43-68. Sinauer Assoc. Sunderland, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Henderson N. 1965. Isozymes of isocitric dehydrogenase: subunit structure and intracellular location.158: 263-272.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Jaas ka V. 1976. Aspartatate aminotransferase isoenzymes in the polyploid wheats and their diploid relatives. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen 170: 159-171.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Kozuharov S. 1982. State of investigations on the gene pool, distribution and phytogeographical connections of genusin Bulgaria. Annuaire de Universite de Sofia “St. Kl. Ohridski” Fac. de biologie75: 11-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Livesey V. & Norrington-Davies J. 1991. Isoenzyme polymorphism inL. Euphytica 55: 52-79.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Markgraf-Dannenberg I. 1976. Die Gattungin Griechenland. Veröff. Geobot. Inst., Rübel (Zürich) 56: 92-182.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Markgraf-Dannenberg I. 1978. New taxa and names in European(Graminae). In: V. Heywood (ed.). Flora Europaea, Notulae SystematicaeJ. Linn. Soc. Bot. 76: 322-328.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Markgraf-Dannenberg I. 1980.. In: T. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Val entine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (eds.). Flora Europea 5, pp. 149-150. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. McLeod M., Guttman S. & Eshbauch W. 1983. Peppers (). In: S. Tanksley & T. Orton (eds.). Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, B, pp. 189-201. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Natur. 106: 283-292.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Perez de la Vega M. & Allard D. 1984. Mating system and genetic polymorphism in populations ofand. Can. J. Genet. Cytol26: 308-317.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Przybylska J., Blixt S., Parzysz H. & Zimniak-Przybylska Z. 1982. Isoenzyme variation in the genus. I. Electrophoretic patterns of several enzyme systems. Genet. Pol23: 103-121.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Sal inas J., Perez de la Vega M. & Benito S. 1982. Identification of hexaploid wheat cultivars based on isoenzyme patterns. J. Sci. Food Agr. 33: 221-226.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Shaw C. & Prasad R. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes - a compilation of recipes. Biochem. J. 4: 297-310.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Sneath P. & Sokal R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. 573 pp. Freeman, San Francisco.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Stojanov N. & Stefanov B. 1924. Flora of Bulgaria. Ed. 1. 1361 pp. State Printing House, Sofia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Stojanov N. & Stefanov B. 1933. Flora of Bulgaria. Ed. 2. 1103 pp. Guttenberg Press, Sofia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Stojanov N. & Stefanov B. 1948. Flora of Bulgaria. Ed. 3. 1351 pp. Univ. Press, Sofia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Stuber M. & Goodma n M. 1980. Genetics of 6-PGD in corn. Maize Genet. Cooperat. News Lett. 54: 100-107.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Warwick S. & Aiken S. 1986. Electrophoretic evidence for the recognition of two species in annual wild rice (Poaceae). Syst. Bot. 11: 464-473.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Wilkinson M. & Stace C. 1981. A new taxonomic treatment of theaggregate (Poaceae) in the British Isles. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 106: 347-397.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Yeh F & O΄Mall ey D. 1980. Enzyme variations in natural populations of Douglas fir, ((Mirb.) Franco, from British Columbia. 1. Genetic variation in coastal populations. Sylvae Genet. 29: 83-92.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-012-0021-6 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 8
Published on: Feb 26, 2013
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Festuca,
species,
isoenzyme variation,
genetic affinities,
systematic relationships
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2013 Georgi B. Angelov, Teodora A. Ivanova, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 28 (2012): Issue 2012 (December 2012)
Next article