Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Allergenic invasive plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in Poland: threat and selected aspects of biology Cover

Allergenic invasive plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in Poland: threat and selected aspects of biology

Biodiversity Research and Conservation
Volume 21 (2011): Issue 2011 (January 2011)
By: ,  ,  ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Oct 2011
References

References

  1. Basset I. J. & Crompton C. W. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds.L. andDC. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55: 463-476.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Bousquet J., van Cauenberge P. & Khaltaev N. 2001. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 108(5): 147-334.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Brandes D. & Nitzsche J. 2007. Verbreitung, Ökologie und Soziologie vonL. in Mitteleuropa. Tuexenia 27: 167-194.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Chauvel B., Dessaint F., Cardinal-Legrand C., Bretagnolle F. 2006. The historical spread ofL. in France from herbarium records. J. Biogeogr. 33: 665-673.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Chłopek K. & Tokarska-Guzik B. 2006. Pyłek ambrozji () w aeroplanktonie Górnego Śląska. Ragweed () pollen in aeroplankton of Górny Śląsk. Acta Agrobot. 59(1): 335-345.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Chłopek K., Tokarska-Guzik B., Balwierz Z., Dąbrowska-Zapart K., Kasprzyk I., Majkowska-Wojciechowska B., Malkiewicz M., Myszkowska D., Piotrowska K., Puc M., Stach A. & Weryszko-Chmielewska E. 2008. Pyłek ambrozji w powietrzu Polski w latach 2001-2007. Ragweed polen in the air of Poland, 2001-2007. Alergologia Immunologia 5(2): 56-58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Christen D. & Matlack G. 2006. The role of roadsides in plant invasions: a demographic approach. Cons. Biol. 20: 385-391.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Comtois P. 1998. Ragweed (sp.): the Phoenix of allergophytes. Satellite Symposium Proceedings: Ragweed in Europe. 6International Congress on Aerobiology, pp. 3-5. ALK Abelló, Perugia, Italy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. DAISIE "100 of the Worst"
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Essl F., Dullinger S. & Kleinbauer I. 2009. Changes in the spatio-temporal patterns and habitat preferences ofduring its invasion of Austria. Preslia 81: 119-133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO)
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Fenner M. & Thompson K. 2005. Soil seed banks. In: M. Fenner & K. Thompson (eds.). The ecology of seeds, pp. 76-89. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Friedman J. & Barret S. 2008. High outcrossing in the annual colonizing species(Asteraceae). Ann Bot 101: 1303-1309.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Fumanal B., Gaudot I., Meiss H. & Bretagnolle F. 2006. Seed demography of the invasive weed:L. In: Book of abstracts of 4th European Conference on Biological Invasions: Neobiota. From Ecology to Conservation, p. 184. Vienna, Austria, 2006-09-27/29, BfN-Skripten.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Gadermaier G., Dedic A., Obermeyer G., Frank S., Himly M. & Ferreira F. 2004. Biology of Weed Pollen Allergens. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 4: 391-400.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Genton B. J., Shykoff J. A. & Giraud T. 2005. High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed,, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol Ecol 14: 4275-4285.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Hulme P., Pyšek P., Nenthwig W. & Viliŕ M. 2009. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science 324: 40-41.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Jäger S. 2000. Ragweed () sensitisation rates correlate with the amount of inhaled airborne pollen. A 14-year study in Vienna, Austria. Aerobiologia 16: 149-153.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Karnowski W. 2001. Pest Risk Analysis and Pest Risk Assessment for the territory of the Republic of Poland (as PRA area) onspp. Toruń
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kazinczi G., Béres I., Novák R. & Bíró K. 2008a. Common ragweed (L.): A review with special regards to the results in Hungary: I. Taxonomy, origin and distribution, morphology, life cycle and reproduction strategy. Herbologia 9(1): 55-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kazinczi G., Béres I., Pathy Z. & Novák R. 2008b. Common ragweed (L.): A review with special regards to the results in Hungary: II. Importance and harmful effect, allergy, habitat, allelopathy and beneficial characteristics. Herbologia 9(1): 93-118.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Kazinczi G., Novák R., Pathy Z. & Béres I. 2008c. Common ragweed (L.): A review with special regards to the results in Hungary: III. Resistant Biotypes, control methods and authority arrangements. Herbologia 9(1): 119-144.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Laaidi M., Thibaudon M. & Besancenot J. P. 2003. Two statistical approaches to forecasting the start and duration of the pollen season ofin the area of Lyon (France). Int. J. Biometeorol. 48: 65-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. von der Lippe M. & Kowarik I. 2007. Crop seed spillage along roads: a factor of uncertainty in the containment of GMO. Ecography 30: 483-490.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Mack R. N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W. M., Evans H., Clout M. & Bazzaz F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689-710.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Makra L., Juhász M., Boros E. & Béczi R. 2004. Meteorological variables connected with airborne ragweed pollen in Southern Hungary. Int. J. Biometeorol. 49: 31-41.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Meiss H., Bannot R., Strbik F., Waldhardt R., Caneill J. & Munier-Jolain N. 2009. Cutting and competition reduce weed growth: additive or interactive effects? XIII Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes, pp. 28-37. Dijon
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Meiss H., Munier-Jolain N., Henriot F. & Caneill J. 2008. Effects of biomass, age and functional traits on regrowth of arable weeds after cutting. J. Plant Dis. Protect. Special Issue 21: 493-500.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa H., Zając A. & Zając M. 2002. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist. In: Z. Mirek (ed.). Biodiversity of Poland 1, 442 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Mooney H. A. & Hobbs R. J. (eds.). 2000. Invasive Species in a Changing World. A Project of SCOPE, the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment. 457 pp. Island Press, Washington, D. C. - Covelo, California.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Munier-Jolain N. M., Chauvel B. & Gasques J. 2002. Long-term modeling of weed control strategies: Analysis of threshold-based options for weed species with contrasted competitive abilities. Weed Res. 42: 107-122.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Payne W. W. 1963. The morphology of the inflorescence of ragweeds (: Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 50: 872-880.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Peternel R., Culig J., Srnec L., Mitic B., Vucusic I. & Hgra I. 2005. Variation in ragweed (L.) pollen concentration in Central Croatia. Ann Agric. Environ Med. 12: 11-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Peternel R., Milanovic S. M. & Srnec L. 2008. Airborne ragweed (L.) pollen content in the city of Zagreb and implications on pollen allergy. Ann Agric. Environ Med. 15(1): 125-130.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Pieper H. 1952. Das Saatgut: ein Handbuch für Landwirte, landwirtschaftliche Berater, Organisationen und Behörden, Saatguthändler und landwirtschaftliche Genossenschaften. 275 pp. Second Edition. Parey, Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Pimental D. (ed.). 2002. Biological Invasions. Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species. 369 pp. CRC Press, Boca Raton-London-New York-Washington D. C.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Poscher E. 1997 (mscr.). Ecology and distribution ofspecies in Europe with special regard to Poland, 107 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Radosevich S. R., Holt J. S. & Ghersa C. 1997. Weed ecology. Implications for Management. 573 pp. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Rybniček O., Novotná B., Rybničkova E. & Rybniček K. 2000. Ragweed in the Czech Republic. Aerobiologia 16: 287-290.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Syreński (Syreniusz) Sz. 1613. Zielnik Herbarzem z ięzyka łacińskiego zowię, to jest opisanie własne imion, kształtu, przyrodzenia, skutków i mocy ziół wszelkich, drzew, krzewin y korzenia ich, kwiatu, owoców, soków, miazg, żywic y korzenia do potraw zaprawowania … Joannicius G. (ed.) w drukarni B. Skalskiego, Krakow, nakł. A. Wazówny.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Tacik T. 1971. Ambrozja (L.). In: B. Pawłowski & A. Jasiewicz (eds.). Flora Polska, 12, pp. 222-225. PWN, Warszawa-Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Testi S., Carabelli A., Cecchi L., Giacomelli C., Iannello G., Rocchi V., Rossi O., Spadolini I., Vannucci F. & Campi P. 2009. Multicenter investigation to assess the prevalence of ambrosia pollen allergy in Tuscany. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 19(3): 237-252.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Tokarska-Guzik B. 2001.L. andDC. In: A. Zając & M. Zając (eds.). Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Poland. Edited by Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Cracow.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Tokarska-Guzik B. 2005. The Establishment and Spread of Alien Plant Species (Kenophytes) in the Flora of Poland. Prace naukowe Uniw. Śląskiego w Katowicach 2372: 1-192.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Tokarska-Guzik B., Węgrzynek B., Urbisz Al., Urbisz An., Bzdęga K., Nowak T., Rostański A., Fojcik B., Jędrzejczyk-Korycińska M. & Pasierbiński A. 2009. The database of vascular plants of the Silesian Uplands and its value for monitoring changes in vegetation. The example of selected alien species. In: J. Holeksa, B. Babczyńska-Sendek & S. Wika (eds.). The role of geobotany in biodiversity conservation, pp. 331-337. University of Silesia, Katowice.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Vincent G. & Ahmim M. 1985. Note on the behavior ofafter cutting. Phytoprotectio 66: 165-168.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Vitalous M. & Karrer G. 2008. The contribution of bird seed, traffic and mowing machines to the spread of. In: P. Pyšek P. & J. Pergl (eds.). Towards a synthesis: Neobiota book of abstracts, p. 120. Institute of Botany, Průhonice
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Vitousek P. M., D'aantonio C. M., Loope L. L., Rejmánek M. & Westerbrooks R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol. 21(1): 1-16.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Vitousek P. M., D'aantonio C. M., Loope L. L. & Westerbrooks R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84: 468-478.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Weryszko-Chmielewska E. & Piotrowska K. 2008. Ecological features ofL. flowers and characteristic ofL. pollen seasons in the condition of Lublin (Poland) in the years 2001-2008. Acta Agrobot. 61(2): 35-47.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Willis J. C. 1973. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. Eight edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Zając A. 1978. Atlas of distribution of vascular plants in Poland (ATPOL). Taxon 27(56): 481-484.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Zając A., Zając M. & Tokarska-Guzik B. 1998. Kenophytes in the flora of Poland: list, status and origin. In: J. B. Faliński, W. Adamowski & B. Jackowiak (eds.). Synantropization of plant cover in new Polish research. Phytocoenosis 10 (N. S.) Suppl. Cartogr. Geobot. 9: 107-116.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-011-0008-8 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 48
Published on: Oct 20, 2011
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
alien invasive species,
distribution,
soil seed bank,
seed germination,
human health,
control
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2011 Barbara Tokarska-Guzik, Katarzyna Bzdęga, Katarzyna Koszela, Izabela Żabińska, Barbara Krzuś, Małgorzata Sajan, Agnieszka Sendek, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 21 (2011): Issue 2011 (January 2011)
Previous article
Next article