Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of the ISSR method to estimate the genetic similarity of Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P. Candargy Greek populations to Triticum and Secale species Cover

Application of the ISSR method to estimate the genetic similarity of Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P. Candargy Greek populations to Triticum and Secale species

Open Access
|Oct 2011

References

  1. Cao Y., Bie T., Wang X. & Chen P. 2009. Induction and transmission ofchromosomal translocations. J. Genet. Genomics 36: 313-320.
  2. De Bustos A. & Jouve N. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the genusbased on the characterization of rDNA ITS sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 235: 147-154.
  3. De Pace C., Paolini R., Scarascia-Mugnozza G. T., Qualset C. O. & Delre V. 1990. Evaluation and utilization ofas a genetic resource for wheat improvement. In: J. P. Srivastava & A B. Damania (eds.). Wheat genetic resources: meeting diverse needs, pp. 279-289, 378-379.
  4. De Pace C., Snidaro D., Ciaffi M., Vittori D., Ciofo A., Cenci A., Tanzarella O. A., Qualset C. O. & Scarascia Mugnozza G. T. 2001. Introgression ofchromatin into common wheat improves grain protein quality. Euphytica 117: 67-75.
  5. Fernández M. E., Figueiras A. M. & Benito C. 2002. The use of ISSR and RAPD markers for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity among barley cultivars with known origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 845-851.
  6. Frederiksen S. 1991. Taxonomic studies in(Poaceae). Nord J. Bot. 11(2): 135-142.
  7. Galasso I., Blanco A., Katsiotis A., Pignone D. & Heslop-Harrison J. S. 1997. Genome organization and phylogenetic relationships in the genusanalyzed by Southern and in situ hybridization of total genomic and cloned DNA probes. Chromosoma 106: 53-61.
  8. Grądzielewska A. 2006a. The genus- part 1. The taxonomy and relationships withinand withspecies. Euphytica 152: 429-440.
  9. Grądzielewska A. 2006b. The genus- part 2.- a wild species used in wheat improvement. Euphytica 152: 441-454.
  10. Hodge C. D., Wang H. & Sun G. 2010. Phylogenetic analysis of the maternal genome of tetraploid StStYY Elymus (Triticeae: Poaceae) species and the monogenomic Triticeae based on rps 16 sequence data. Plant Science 178: 463-468.
  11. Liu D. J., Chen P. D. & Raupp W. J. 1995. Determination of homoeologous groups ofchromosomes. In: Proc. of the 8th Intern. Wheat Genetic Symp., pp. 181-185. Chinese Agricultural Scientech Press, Bejing, China.
  12. Lucas H. & Jahier J. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships in some diploid species of Triticineae: cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 498-502.
  13. Milligan B. G. 1992. Plant DNA isolation In: Molecular analysis of populations: a practical approach. pp. 59-88. IRL Press, Oxford, UK.
  14. Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 70: 3321-3323.
  15. Nei M. & Li W. H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76: 5269-5273.
  16. Pejic I., Ajmone-Marsan P., Morgante M., Kozumplicck V., Castiglioni P., Taramino G. & Motto M. 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 248-1255.
  17. Rakoczy-Trojanowska M. & Bolibok H. 2004. Characteristics and a comparison of three classes of microsatellitebased markers and their application in plants. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 9: 221-238.
  18. Rohlf F. J. 2001. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 5.1. Exeter Publishing Ltd., Setauket, N. Y.
  19. Sakamoto S. 1973. Patterns of phylogenetic differentiation in the tribe Triticeae. Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. 24: 11-31.
  20. Sarla N., Neeraja C. N. & Siddiq E. A. 2005. Use of anchored (AG) and (GA) primers to asses genetic diversity of Indian landraces and varieties of rice. Curr. Sci. 89(8): 1371-1381.
  21. Shang H. Y., Wei Y. M., Wang X. R. & Zheng Y. L. 2006. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in the rye genusL. (rye) based onmicrosatellite markers. Genet. Mol. Biol. 29(4): 685-691.
  22. Tams S. H., Bauer E., Oettler G. & Melchinger A. E. 2004. Genetic diversity in European winter triticale determined with SSR markers and coancestry coefficient. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1385-1391.
  23. Uslu E., Reader S. M. & Miller T. E. 1999. Characterization of(L.) Candargy chromosomes by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Hereditas 131: 129-134.
  24. West J. G., Mcintyre C. L. & Apples R. 1988. Evolution and systematic relationships in the Triticeae (Poaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 160: 1-28.
  25. Yildirim A., Jones S. S. & Murray T. D. 1998. Mapping a gene conferring resistance toon chromosome 4 V ofin a wheat background. Genome 41: 1-6.
  26. Yuan W.-Y. E. & Tomita M. 2009. Centromeric distribution of 350-family inand its application to identifyingchromatin in the wheat genome. Hereditas 146: 58-66.
  27. Zhang Q., Li Q., Wang X., Wang H., Lang S., Wang Y., Wang S., Chen P. & Liu D. 2005. Development and characterization of atrans-location line T4VS·4DL conferring resistance to wheat spindle streak mosaic virus. Euphytica 145: 317-320.
  28. Ziętkiewicz E., Rafalski A. & Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple - sequence repeat (SSR) - anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-011-0002-1 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 12
Published on: Oct 20, 2011
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2011 Agnieszka Grądzielewska, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.