Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Genetic relationships between some of Malva species as determined with ISSR and ISJ markers Cover

Genetic relationships between some of Malva species as determined with ISSR and ISJ markers

Biodiversity Research and Conservation
Volume 19 (2010): Issue 2010 (September 2010)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jul 2011
References

References

  1. Abromeit J., Jentzsch A. & Vogel G. 1898. Flora von Ostund Westpreussen. I, 690 pp. In Komission bei R. Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Ascherson P. & Graebner P. 1898-1899. Flora des Nordostdeutschen Flachlandes (ausser Ostpreussen). xii+875 pp. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bączkiewicz A., Sawicki J., Buczkowska K. Polok K. & Zielińaski R. 2008. Application of different DNA markers in studies on cryptic species of(Hepaticae, Metzgeriales). Cryptogamie Bryologie 29(1): 3-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Boisselier-Dubayle M. C., Jubier M. F., Lejeune B. & Bischler H. 1995. Genetic variability in the three subspecies of(Hepaticae): Isozymes, RFLP and RAPD markers. Taxon 44: 363-376.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bonin A., Bellemain E., Bronken Eidesen P., Pompanon F., Brochmann C. & Taberlet P. 2004. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetic studies. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3261-3273.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Celka Z., Drapikowska M., Buczkowska K., Bączkiewicz A. & Marciniak J. 2006a. Morphological variability ofL. populations from Poland. In: P. Kočáarek, V. PLášek & K. Malachová (eds.). Environmental changes and biological assessment. III. Scripta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Ostraviensis 163:159-165.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Celka Z., Szkudlarz P. & Biereżnoj U. 2006b. Morphological variation of hairs inL. (Malvaceae). Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 3-4: 258-261.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Celka Z., Drapikowska M., Lembicz M., Kubiak L. & Szkudlarz P. 2008. The population ofat the medieval settlement: from distribution to the reproduction of individuals. In: P. Kočárek, V. Plášek, K. Malachová & Š Cimalová (eds.). Environmental changes and biological assessment. IV. Scripta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Ostraviensis 186: 224-230.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Celka Z., Drapikowska M., Ogrodowicz K., Shevera M. V. & Szkudlarz P. 2007. Differentiation of petals in thepopulations from the region of Central and Eastern Europe. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 5-8: 17-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Cronberg N. 1996. Isozyme evidence of relationships withinsect.(Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta). Pl. Syst. Evol. 203: 41-64.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Dalby D. H. 1968.L. In: T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Weeb (eds.). Flora Europea. Rosaceae to Umbelliferae, 2, pp. 249-251. Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Daniels R. E. & Eddy A. 1990. Handbook of European Sphagna. 263 pp. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Natural Environment Research Council, Hmso. London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Dogan B., Duran A. & Hakki E. E. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of(Asteraceae) species from Turkey based on Issr amplification. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 44: 353-358.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Dostál J. 1989. Nová kvetena ČSSR. 1548+viii pp. Academia Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. El Naggar S. M. 2004. Pollen Morphology of Egyptian Malvaceae: An Assessment of Taxonomic Value. Turk. J. Bot. 28: 227-240.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Escobar García P., Schönswetter P., Fuertes Aguilar J., Nieto Feliner G., & Schneeweiss G. M. 2009. Five molecular markers reveal extensive morphological homoplasy and reticulate evolution in thealliance (Malvaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50: 226-239.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Ferriol M., Pico B. & Nuez F. 2003. Genetic diversity of a germplasm collection ofusing SRPA and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 271-282.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Furmanowa M., Michalska Z., Parczewski A. & Zarębska I. 1959. Lecznictwo renesansowe w Polsce na podstawie "erbarza" Marcina z Urzędowa. Studia i Materiały z Dziejów Nauki Polskiej. Seria B - Historia nauk biologicznych i medycznych 2: 233-313.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Garcke A. 1972. Illustrierte Flora Deutschland und angrenzende Gebiete. 1607 pp. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin und Hamburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gunnarsson U., Hassel K. & Soderstrom L. 2005. Genetic structure of the endangered peat mossin Sweden: a result of historic or contemporary processes? Bryologist 108: 194-203.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Hamrick J. L. & Godt M. J. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler & B. S. Weir (eds.). Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Germplasm Resources, pp. 43-63. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Hegi G. 1925. Malvaceae. In: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa 5(1): 453-498. J. F. Lehmanns Verlag München.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Hey J. & Wakeley J. 1997. A coalescent estimator of the population recombination rate. Genetics 145: 833-846.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Hlavaček A. 1982. Malvaceae. In: J. Futák & L. Bertová (eds.). Flora Slóvenska, 3, pp. 372-405. VEDA, vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied Bratislava.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Inamdar J. A. & Chohan A. J. 1969. Epidermal Structure and Stomatal Development in Some Malvaceae and Bombacaceae. Oxford Journals - Annals of Botany 33: 865-878.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Inamdar J. A., Balakrishna Bhat R. & Ramana Rao T. V. 1983. Structure, ontogeny, classification, and taxonomic significance of trichomes in Malvales. Korean J. Bot. 26(3): 151-160.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Jundziłł B. S. 1791. Opisanie roślin w prowincyi W. X. L. naturalnie rosnących według układu Linneusza. 570 pp. + Regester. W Drukarni J. K. Mci y Rzeplitey u XX. Piarow.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Kluk K. 1808. Dykcyonarz roślinny, 2, 256 pp. Drukarnia Xięży Piarów, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Kumar P. & Singh Dalbir 1991. Development and structure of seed coat inL. Phytomorphology 41(1-2): 147-153.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Liu X.-Q., Gituru R.W. & Chen L.-Q. 2007. Genetic variation in the endangered fernvar.(Adiantaceae) in China. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 44: 25-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Mabberley D. J. 1987. The plant-book. 858 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Marcin Z Urzędowa 1595. Herbarz Polski. Drukarnia Lazarzowa, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Mirek Z., PIękoś-Mirkowa H., ZająC A. & Zając M. 2002. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist. In: Z. Mirek (ed.). Biodiversity of Poland 1, 442 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Mosyakin S. L. 1999. Malvaceae. In: S. L. Mosyakin & M M. Fedoronchuk (eds.). Vascular plants of Ukraine a nomenclatural checklist, pp. 249-250. M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Kiev.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Nei M. & Li W. H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5269-5273.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Olyanitskaya L. G. & Tzvelev N. N. 1996. Malvaceae. In: N. N. Tzvelev (ed.). Flora Europae Orientalis, pp. 231-255. Mir i Semia Petropoli.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Peakall R. & Smouse P. E. 2006. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Not. 6: 288-295.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Percifield R. J., Hawkins J. S., Mccoy J.-A., Widrlechner M. P. & Wendel J. F. 2007. Genetic diversity inand AFLP markers for species-specific identification ofL. Planta Med 73: 1614-1621.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. PlášeK V. & Sawicki J. 2010. Is the hairy vaginula an diagnostic feature in the taxonomy of the genus? Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 79: 73-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Polok K. 2005. Evolutionary status of closely relatedtaxa. In: W. Prus-GŁowacki & E. Pawlaczyk (eds.). Variability and Evolution - New Perspectives, Biologia 72: 195-208. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Polok K. 2007. Molecular evolution of the genusL. 317 pp. Studio Poligrafii Komputerowej "SQL", Olsztyn.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Ray M. F. 1995. Systematics ofand- a new perspective. Pl. Syst. Evol. 198: 29-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Ray M. F. 1998. New Combinations in(Malvaceae: Malveae). Novon 8: 288-295.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Reichenbach L. 1841. Icones florae germanicae et helveticae. Apud Fridericum Hofmeister, Lipsiae.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Rothmaler W., Jäger E. J. & Werner K. 2005. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Band 4, Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band. 980 pp. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Elsevier Gmbh, München.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Rutkowski L. 2004. Klucz do oznaczania roślin naczyniowych Polski niżowej. 814 pp. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Sawicki J. & Szczecińska M. 2007. Semi-specific intron-exon splice junction markers in bryophyte studies. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 5-8: 25-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Sawicki J., Szczecińska M., Korniak T. & Hołdyński Cz. 2006. Genetic structure ofsubsp.R. Schulz andsubsp.populations. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1-2: 46-49.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Sawicki J. & Zieliński R. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships between fivespecies of the sectionbased on DNA markers. Cas. Slez. Muz. Opava 57: 63-80.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Sawicki J., Plášek V. & Szczecińska M. 2010. Molecular studies resolve(Orthotrichaceae) as a separate genus. J. Syst. Evol. 48: 183-194.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Schlechtendal D. F. L., Langethal L. E. & Schenk E. 1885. Flora von Deutschland, 21, 304 pp. Verlag von Fr. Eugen Köhler Gera-Untermhaus.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. SlavíK B. 1992. Malvaceae Juss. - slézovité. In: B. S. Hejný & B. SlavíK (eds.). Květena České republiky, 3, pp. 282-316. Academia, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. SlavíK B. 2002. Malvaceae. In: K. Kubát (ed.). Klíč ke květeně české republiky, 286-290 pp. Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Swofford D. L. 2003. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods) (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA), 4.0 Beta Syreniusz 1613. Zielnik Simona Syrenniusa z 1613 r. www.zielnik-syrenniusa.art.pl.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Szczecińska M., Sawicki J., Polok K., Hołdyński Cz. & Zieliński R. 2006. Comparison of thespecies from Poland on the basis of different DNA markers. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 43(5): 379-388.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Szczecińska M., Sawicki J., Wąsowicz K. & Hołdyński Cz. 2009. Genetic variation of the relict and endangered population of(Ericaceae) in Poland. Dendrobiology 62:23-33.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Vanderpoorten A., Hedenas L. & Jacquemart A.-L. 2003. Differentiation in DNA fingerprinting and morphology among species of the pleurocarpous moss genus,(Hylocomiaceae). Taxon 52: 229-236.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Walas J. 1959. Malvaceae, Ślazowate. In: W. Szafer & B. Pawłowski (eds.). Flora polska. Rośliny naczyniowe Polski i ziem ościennych, 8, pp. 278-301. PWN, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Weining S. & Langridge P. 1991. Identification and mapping of polymorphisms in cereals based on polymerase chain reaction. Theor Appl Genet 82: 209-216.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Werner O., Jime'nez J. A., Ros R. M., Cano M. J. & Guerra J. 2005. Preliminary investigation of the systematics of(Pottiaceae, Musci) based on nr ITS sequence data. Syst. Bot. 30: 461-470.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Wolfe A. D. & Liston A. 1998. Contributions of PCR-based methods to plant systematics and evolutionary biology. In: D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis & J. J. Doyle (eds.). Molecular Systematics in plants. II. DNA sequencing, pp. 43-86. Kluwer Academic Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Wünsche O. 1932. Die Pflanze Deutschalnds. Eine Anleitung zu ihrer Kenntnis. II. Die höheren pflanzen. 603 pp. Verlag und Druck von. B. G. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Zając A. 1979. Pochodzenie archeofitów występujących w Polsce. Rozpr. habil. Uniw. Jagiell. 29: 1-213. Druk UJ w Krakowie.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Zietkiewicz E., Rafalski A. & Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR) - anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-010-0006-2 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 32
Published on: Jul 11, 2011
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Malva,
genetic similarity,
molecular markers,
ISJ,
ISSR
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2011 Zbigniew Celka, Monika Szczecińska, Jakub Sawicki, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 19 (2010): Issue 2010 (September 2010)
Previous article
Next article