Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of forest management on genetic diversity of Quercus petraea populations: a case study from the Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area (Czech Republic) Cover

Impact of forest management on genetic diversity of Quercus petraea populations: a case study from the Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area (Czech Republic)

Biodiversity Research and Conservation
Volume 13 (2009): Issue 2009 (March 2009)
By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2010
References

References

  1. Bakker E. G. 2001. Towards molecular tools for management of oak forests. Genetic studies on indigenousL. and Q.(Matt.) Liebl. populations. 117 pp. Alterra Green World Research, Wageningen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bradshaw R. H. W. 2004. Past anthropogenic influence on European forests and some possible genetic consequences.197: 203-212.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Bruschi P., Vendramin G. G., Bussotti F. & Grossoni P. 2003. Morphological and molecular diversity among italian populations of(Fagaceae).91: 707-716.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Cottrell J. E., Munro R. C., Tabbener H. E., Milner A. D., Forrest G. I. & Lowe A. J. 2003. Comparison of fine-scale genetic structure using nuclear microsatellites within two British oakwoods differing in population history.176: 287-303.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Dow B. D., Ashley M. V. & Howe H. F. 1995. Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak,91: 137-141.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Finkeldey R. 2000. Genetic Variation of Oaks (spp.) in Switzerland. 2. Genetic Structures in "Pure" and "Mixed" Forests of Pedunculate Oak (L.) and Sessile Oak ((Matt.) Liebl.).50: 22-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Jensen J. S. 1993. Variation of growth in Danish provenance trials with oak (L. and(Mattuschka) Liebl.).50 (Suppl. 1): 203-207.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Kampfer S., Lexer C., Glössl J. & Steinkellner H. 1998. Characterization of (GA)microsatellite loci from129: 183-186.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Lexer C., Heinze B., Gerber S., Steinkellner H., Ziegenhagen B., Kremer A. & Glössl H. 1999. Microsatellite analysis of anonymous seedlot samples from oak: a promising approach to monitor the number of different seed parents and pollen donors. In: E. M. Gillet (ed.). Which DNA marker for which purpose? Final compendium of the research project development, optimisation and validation of molecular tools for assessment of biodiversity in forest trees in the European Union DGXII Biotechnology FW IV Research Programme Molecular Tools for Biodiversity. http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/y/1999/whichmarker/index.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Muir G., Lowe A. J., Fleming C. C. & Vogl J. 2004. High nuclear genetic diversity, high levels of outcrossing and low differentiation among remnant populations ofat the margin of its range in Ireland.93: 691-697.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small numberof individuals.101: 139-155.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Petit R. J., Kremer A. & Wagner D. B. 1993. Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in European oaks.87: 122-128.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Siegismund H. R. & Jensen J. S. 2001. Intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic variation ofin Denmark.16: 103-116.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Steinkellner H., Fluch S., Turetschek E., Lexer C., Streiff R., Kremer A., Burg K. & Glössl J. 1997. Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)- microsatellite loci from33: 1093-1096.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Streiff R. 1999: Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand ofL. and(Matt.)8: 831-841.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Streiff R. Labbe T., Bacilieri R., Steinkellner H., Gloessl J. & Kremer A. 1998. Within-population genetic structure inL. and(Matt.) Liebl. Assessed with isozymes and microsatellites.7: 317-328.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Streiff R., Ducousso A., Lexer C., Steinkellner H., Gloessl J. & Kremer A. 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand ofL. and(Matt.)8: 831-841.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Ter Braak C. J. F. Šmilauer P. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to canoco for windows. software for canonical community ordination (Version 4). 350 pp. Centre of Biometry, Wageningen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Wang X.-R. & Szmidt A. E. 2001. Molecular markers in population genetics of forest trees.16: 199-220.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Woessner R. A. 1975. Interprovenance crosses of loblolly pine. In: D. J. Fowler & C. W. Yeatman (eds.). Proc. 14th Meeting of the Canadian Tree Improvement Association, p. 17-23. Fredricton, New Brunswick.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Yeh F. C., Yang R. C. & Boyle T. 1999. POPGENE version 1.31. A quick user guide. Univ. Alberta, Alberta.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Zanetto A. & Kremer A. 1995. Geographical structure of gene diversity in(Matt.) Liebl. I. Monolocus patterns of variation.75: 506-517.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-009-0007-1 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 42
Published on: May 17, 2010
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Quercus petraea,
genetic diversity,
microsatellites,
forest management
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2010 Markéta Pospíšková, Jiří Dostálek, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 13 (2009): Issue 2009 (March 2009)
Previous article
Next article