Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Easily-accessible digital palaeontological databases-a new perspective for the storage of palaeontological information Cover

Easily-accessible digital palaeontological databases-a new perspective for the storage of palaeontological information

Geologos
Volume 15 (2009): Issue 3-4 (December 2009)
By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2009
References

References

  1. Alroy, J., Aberhan, M., Bottjer, D. J., Foote, M., Fürsich, F. T., Harries, P. J., Hendy, A. J., Holland, S. M., Ivany, L. C., Kiessling, W., Kosnik, M. A., Marshall, C. R., McGowan, A. J., Miller, A. I., Olszewski, T. D., Patzkowsky, M. E., Peters, S. E., Villier, L., Wagner, P. J., Bonuso, N., Borkow, P. S., Brenneis, B., Clapham, M. E., Fall, L. M., Ferguson, C. A., Hanson, V. L., Krug, A. Z., Layou, K. M., Leckey, E. H., Nürnberg, S., Powers, C. M., Sessa, J. A., Simpson, C., Tomasovych, A. & Visaggi, C. C., 2008. Phanerozoic trends in the global diversity of marine invertebrates.321, 97-100.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Berendsohn, W. G., 1995. The concept of "potential taxa" in databases.44, 207-212.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Chandrasekaran, B., Johnson, T. & Benjamins, V., 1999. Ontologies: what are they? Why do we need them?14, 20-26.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Choh, S.-J. & Milliken, K. L., 2004. Virtual carbonate thin section using PDF: new method for interactive visualization and archiving.19, 87-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. De Keyser, T. L., 1999. Digital scanning of thin sections and peels.69, 962-964.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Di, L. & McDonald, K., 1999. Next generation data and information systems for earth sciences research.Science Press, Beijing, China, 92-101.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Gahegan, M., Luo, J., Weaver, S. D., Pike, W. & Banchuen, T., 2009. Connecting GEON: Making sense of the myriad resources, researchers and concepts that comprise a geoscience cyberinfrastructure.35, 836-854.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Gruber, T. R., 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.5, 199-220.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Huber, R. & Klump, J., 2009. Charting taxonomic knowledge through ontologies and ranking algorithms.35, 862-868.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Krell, F.-T., 2000. Impact factors aren't relevant to taxonomy.405, 507-508.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Lamoureux, F. & Bollmann, J., 2004. Image acquisition. [In:] P. Francus (ed.):Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, 11-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Lutz, M., 2007. Ontology-based descriptions for semantic discovery and composition of geoprocessing services.11, 1-36.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Lyons, P. D., Rioux, M. & Patterson, T., 2000. Application of a three-dimensional color laser scanner to paleontology: an interactive model of a juvenilesp. basisphenoid-basioccipital.3 (2), 16 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. MacLeod, N. & Guralnick, R., 2000. Paleoinformatics. [In:] R. H. Lane, F. F. Steininger, R. L. Kaesler, W. Zeigler & J. Lipps (eds):Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt, 31-36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Molineux, A., Scott, R. W., Ketcham, R. A. & Maisano, J. A., 2007. Rudist taxonomy using X-ray computed tomography.10, 6 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Pirard, E., 2004. Image measurements. [In:] P. Francus (ed.):Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, 59-86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Rees, P. M., Alroy, J., Scotese, C., Memon, A., Rowley, D. B., Parrish, J. T., Weishampel, D. B, Platon, E., O'Leary, M. A. & Chandler, M. A., 2007. Phanerozoic earth and life: the Paleointegration Project., Paper No. 5-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Reitsma, F., Laxton, J., Ballard, S., Kuhn, W. & Abdelmoty, A., 2009. Semantics, ontologies and eScience for the geosciences.35, 706-709.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Ruban, D. A. & Van Loon, A. J., 2008. Possible pitfalls in the procedure for paleobiodiversity-dynamics analysis.14, 37-50.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Smith, N. E. & Strait, S. G., 2008. PaleoView3D: from specimen to online digital model.11, 17 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Stearn, C. W., 1999. Easy access to doubtful taxonomic decisions.2, 4 pp.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Theodor, J. M. & Furr, R. S., 2009. High dynamic range imaging as applied to paleontological specimen photography.12, 30 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Valdecasas, A. G., Castroviejo, S. & Marcus, L. F., 2000. Reliance on the citation index undermines the study of biodiversity.403, 698.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. White, J. V., Kirkland, B. L. & Gournay, J. P., 1998. Quantitative porosity determination of thin sections using digitized images.68, 220-222.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Wilhite, R., 2003. Digitizing large fossil skeletal elements for three-dimensional applications.5, 10 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Wolniewicz, P., 2009. Late Famennian stromatoporoids from Dębnik Anticline, southern Poland.54, 337-350.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10118-009-0002-1 | Journal eISSN: 2080-6574 | Journal ISSN: 1426-8981
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 181 - 188
Published on: Dec 24, 2009
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
digitization,
morphometrics,
palaeoinformatics,
palaeontological collections,
palaeontological databases,
semantic web
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geology and mineralogy

© 2009 Paweł Wolniewicz, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 15 (2009): Issue 3-4 (December 2009)
Previous article
Next article