Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Forest structure, competition and plant-herbivore interaction modelled with relational growth grammars Cover

Forest structure, competition and plant-herbivore interaction modelled with relational growth grammars

Central European Forestry Journal
Volume 58 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
By: Winfried Kurth,  Ole Kniemeyer and  Branislav Sloboda  
Open Access
|Oct 2012

References

  1. ABELSON H., DISESSA A.A., 1982: Turtle Geometry. Cambridge, MIT Press: 512 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. ACOCK B., REYNOLDS J.F., 1997: Introduction: Modularity in plant models. Ecological Modelling, 94: 1-6.10.1016/S0304-3800(96)01923-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. BORMANN F.H., LIKENS G.E., 1979: Pattern and Process in Forested Ecosystems. New York, Springer: 253 p.10.1007/978-1-4612-6232-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. BRECKLING B., 1990: Singularitat und Reproduzierbarkeit in der Modellierung okologischer Systeme. Dissertation, University of Bremen, FB2: 401 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. BRECKLING B., 1996: An individual based model for the study of pattern and process in plant ecology: An application of object oriented programming. EcoSys, 4: 241-254.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. BUCK-SORLIN G.H., KNIEMEYER O., KURTH W., 2005: Barley morphology, genetics and hormonal regulation of internode elongation modelled by a Relational Growth Grammar. New Phytologist, 166(3): 859-867.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01324.x15869647
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. DEANGELIS D.L., GROSS L.J. (eds.), 1992: Individual-based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities and Ecosystems. New York, Chapman & Hall: 525 p.10.1007/978-1-4757-0869-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. DEUSSEN O., HANRAHAN P., LINTERMANN B., MĕCH R., PHARR M., PRUSINKIEWICZ P., 1998: Realistic modeling and rendering of plant ecosystems. SIGGRAPH 98 (Orlando, Fl., July 19-24, 1998), Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 1998: 275-286.10.1145/280814.280898
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. ERMENTROUT G.B., EDELSTEIN-KESHET L., 1993. Cellular automata approaches to biological modelling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 160: 97-133.10.1006/jtbi.1993.10078474249
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. GOSLING J., JOY B., STEELE G., BRACHNA G., 2005: The Java Language Specification. Third Edition. Reading, Addison-Wesley: 649 p. http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/ (last access: January 19, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. GRIMM V., RAILSBACK S.F., 2005: Individual-based Modeling and Ecology. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press: 428 p.10.1515/9781400850624
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. HEMMERLING R., KNIEMEYER O., LANWERT D., KURTH W., BUCK-SORLIN G., 2008: The rule-based language XL and the modelling environment GroIMP illustrated with simulated tree competition. Functional Plant Biology, 35: 739-750.10.1071/FP0805232688828
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. KNAUFT F.J., 2000: Entwicklung von Methoden zur GIS-gestutzten Visualisierung von Wald entwicklungsszenarien. Ph.D. thesis, University of Gottingen, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology: 127 p., <http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2000/knauft/>inhalt.htm.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. KNIEMEYER O., 2008: Design and Implementation of a Graph Grammar Based Language for Functional-structural Plant Modelling. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cottbus: 432 p., http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:de: kobv:co1-opus-5937.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. KNIEMEYER O., BUCK-SORLIN G.H., KURTH W., 2004: A graph grammar approach to Artificial Life. Artificial Life, 10 (4): 413-431.10.1162/106454604176645115479546
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. KNIEMEYER O., BUCK-SORLIN G.H., KURTH W., 2007: GroIMP as a platform for functional-structural modelling of plants. In: VOS J., MARCELIS L.F.M., DEVISSER P.H.B., STRUIK P.C., EVERS J.B. (eds.): Functional-Structural Plant Modelling in Crop Production. Dordrecht, Springer: 43-52.10.1007/1-4020-6034-3_4
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. KURTH W., 1994: Growth Grammar Interpreter GROGRA 2.4. Berichte des Forschungs zentrums Waldokosysteme der Universitat Gottingen, Ser. B, 38: 192 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. KURTH W., 1999: Die Simulation der Baumarchitektur mit Wachstumsgrammatiken. Berlin, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin: 327 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. KURTH W., SLOBODA B., 1999a: Tree and stand architecture described by formal grammars. I. Non-sensitive trees. J. Forest Sci., 45: 16-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. KURTH W., SLOBODA B., 1999b: Tree and stand architecture described by formal grammars. II. Sensitive trees and competition. J. Forest Sci., 45: 53-63.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. KURTH W., 2000a: Spezifikation raumlicher Bestandes- und Populationsmodelle mit sensitiven Grammatiken. In: SABOROWSKI J., SLOBODA B. (eds.): DVFFA Sektion Forstliche Biometrie u. Informatik, 12. Tagung 1999. Ljubljana, Biotechn. Fak.: 259-278.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. KURTH W., 2000b: Towards universality of growth grammars: Models of Bell, Pages, and Takenaka revisited. Ann. For. Sci., 57: 543-554.10.1051/forest:2000141
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. KURTH W., 2002: Spezifikation der Simulation der Struktur und Dynamik von Pflanzenbestanden und Tierpopulationen mit senlesnik2012sitiven Wachstumsgrammatiken. In: WITTMANN J., GNAUCK A. (ed.): Simulation in Umwelt- und Geowissenschaften. Workshop Cottbus, 7.-8. 3. 2002. Aachen, Shaker: 37-51.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. KURTH W., 2007: Specification of morphological models with Lsystems and Relational Growth Grammars. Image - Journal of Interdisciplinary Image Science, 5 / Special Issue.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. KURTH W., KNIEMEYER O., BUCK-SORLIN G.: Relational Growth Grammars - a graph rewriting approach to dynamical systems with a dynamical structure. In: BANATRE J.-P., FRADET P., GIAVITTO J.-L., MICHEL O. (eds.): Unconventional Programming Paradigms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3566, Berlin, Springer: 56-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. KURTH W., LANWERT D., 2011: Grammar-based models and fractals. In: JOPP F., REUTER H., BRECKLING B. (eds.): Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics. Berlin, Springer: 147-161.10.1007/978-3-642-05029-9_11
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. KURTH W., SLOBODA B., 2011: Sensitive growth grammars specifying models of forest structure, competition and plant-herbivore interaction. In: RENNOLLS K. (ed.): Pro ceedings of the IUFRO 4.11 Congress “Forest Biometry, Modelling and Information Science”, Greenwich, UK (25.-29. 6. 2001), online publication, http://www.uni-forst.gwdg.de/~wkurth/cb/html/gree_tx.pdf (last access: May 6, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. LEWANDOWSKI A., VON GADOW K., 1997: Ein heuristischer Ansatz zur Reproduktion von Wald bestanden. Allg. Forst- u. Jagdzeitg., 168: 170-174.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. LINDENMAYER A., 1968: Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 18: 280-299, 300-315.10.1016/0022-5193(68)90079-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. LUKE S., CIOFFI-REVILLA C., PANAIT L., SULLIVAN K., BALAN G., 2005: MASON: A multi-agent simulation environment. Simulation, 82: 517-527.10.1177/0037549705058073
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. NORTH M.J., TATARA E., COLLIER N.T., OZIK J., 2007: Visual agentbased model development with Repast Simphony. In: Agent 2007 Conference: Complex Interaction and Social Emergence, 15-17 Nov. 2007, Evanston, IL: 173-192.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. PENTTINEN A., STOYAN D., HENTTONEN H.M., 1994: Marked point processes in forest statistics. For. Sci., 38: 806-824.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. PFREUNDT J., SLOBODA B., 1996: The relation of local stand structure to photosynthetic capacity in a spruce stand: A model calculation. Lesnictvi / Forestry, 42: 149-160.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. PRETZSCH H., 1992a: Kronenformen und ihre Veranderung unter Konkurrenz. In: Jahrestagung 1992 d. Sekt. Ertragskunde des Dt. Vb. Forstl. Forschungsanstalten, Grillenburg: 40-61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. PRETZSCH H., 1992b. Modellierung der Kronenkonkurrenz von Fichte und Buche in Rein- und Mischbestanden. Allg. Forst- u. Jagdzeitg., 163: 203-213.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. PRETZSCH H., 2001: Modellierung des Waldwachstums. Berlin, Parey: 341 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. PRETZSCH H., 2009: Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield. Berlin, Springer: 664 p.10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. PRUSINKIEWICZ P., LINDENMAYER A., 1990: The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. New York, Springer: 228 p.10.1007/978-1-4613-8476-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. PRUSINKIEWICZ P., HAMMEL M., HANAN J., MĚCH R., 1997: Visual models of plant development. In: ROZENBERG G., SALOMAA A. (eds.): Handbook of Formal Languages. Vol. 3: Beyond Words. Berlin, Springer: 535-597.10.1007/978-3-642-59126-6_9
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. RAILSBACK S.F., GRIMM V., 2011: Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction. Princeton, Princeton University Press: 352 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. SLOBODA B., 1983. Moglichkeiten der mathematischen Vorhersage der Holzproduktion im Wirtschaftswald. Forstarchiv, 54: 134-142.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. THIELE J.C., KURTH W., GRIMM V., 2011: Agent- and individual-based modeling with NetLogo: Introduction and new NetLogo extensions. In: ROMISCH K., NOTHDURFT A., WUNN, U. (eds.): Die Grune Reihe 22. Tagung der Sektion Forstliche Biometrie und Informatik des Deutschen Verbandes Forstlicher Forschungsanstalten und der Arbeits gemeinschaft Okologie und Umwelt der Internationalen Biometrischen Gesellschaft - Deutsche Region, 20-21 September 2010 in Gottingen (Germany): 68-101.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. WILENSKY U., RAND W., (in press): An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10114-011-0012-0 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 91
Published on: Oct 31, 2012
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
konkurencia,
štruktúra,
herbivory,
model,
gramatika,
FSPM (functional-structuralplant model)
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2012 Winfried Kurth, Ole Kniemeyer, Branislav Sloboda, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)Next article