Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Modelling the effects of natural and artificial regeneration on genetic structure. 1. Pure spruce stand Cover

Modelling the effects of natural and artificial regeneration on genetic structure. 1. Pure spruce stand

Open Access
|Jul 2011

References

  1. Brunel D., Rodolphe F., 1985: Genetic neighbourhood structure in a population of Picea abies L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 71: 101-110.10.1007/BF00278260
  2. Degen B., Gregorius H.R., Scholz F., 1996: ECO-GENE, a model for simulation studies on the spatial and temporal dynamics of genetic structures of tree populations. Silvae Genetica, 45: 323-329.
  3. Degen B., 1997: Manual for Eco-Gene light (Version 1.0). Dostupné na internete: http://kourou.cirad.fr/genetique/
  4. Degen B., Petit R., Kremer A., 2001: SGS-Spatial genetic sortware: A computer program for analysis of spatial genetic and phenotypic structures of individuals and populations. Journal of Heredity, 92: 447-449.10.1093/jhered/92.5.447
  5. Dovčiak M., Hrivnák R., Ujházy K., Gömöry D., 2008: Seed rain and environmental controls on invasion of Picea abies into grassland. Plant Ecology, 194: 135-148.10.1007/s11258-007-9280-2
  6. Epperson BK., 1992: Spatial structure of genetic variation within populations of forest trees. New Forests, 6: 257-278.10.1007/978-94-011-2815-5_14
  7. Finkeldey R., Ziehe M., 2004: Genetic implications of silvicultural regimes. Forest Ecology and Management, 197: 231-24410.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.036
  8. Gömöry D., 1992: Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of norway spruce (Picea-abies Karst.) populations. Forest ecology and management, 54(1-4): 215-223.10.1016/0378-1127(92)90014-Z
  9. Gömöry D., 1995: Simulation of the genetic structure and reproduction in plant populations: short note. Forest Genetics, 2(1): 59-63.
  10. Gömöry D., Paule L., 2004: Management implications of intrapopulation and nterpopulation genetic variation in Norway spruce. In: J. Novotný (ed.): Close to Nature Forestry. Zvolen : Forestry Research Institute Zvolen, p. 129-137.
  11. Gregorius H.R., 1991: On the concept of effective number. Theoretical Population Biology, 40: 269-283.10.1016/0040-5809(91)90056-L
  12. Hardy O., Vekemans X., 1999: Isolation by distance in a continuous population, reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models. Heredity, 83:145-154.10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00558.x10469202
  13. Jankovič J., 1996: Možnosti zvýšenia podielu prirodzenej obnovy lesa na príklade LHC Oravská Polhora. Vedecké práce Lesníckeho výskumného ústavu vo Zvolene, Zvolen : LVÚ Zvolen, s. 153-164.
  14. Konnert M., 1991: Die Fichte (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) im Schwarzwald: Genetische Variation und Korrelationen. Fostw. Cbl., 110: 84-94.10.1007/BF02741242
  15. Krajmerová D., Longauer R., 2000: Genetická diverzita smreka obyčajného (Picea abies Karst.) na Slovensku. Lesn. Čas. - Forestry Journal, 46(3): 273-286.
  16. Kramer K., 2004: Effects of silvicultural regimes on dynamics of genetic and ecological diversity of European beech forests. Final Report of 5th framework project DynaBeech, QLK5-CT-1999-1210, 109 s.
  17. Lagercranz U., Ryman N., 1990. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies): concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Nature, 44(1): 38-53.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04278.x28568198
  18. Lindgren D., Gea L., D., Jefferson P., A., 1996: Loss of genetics diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genetica, 45: 52-59.
  19. Longauer R., Gömöry D., Paule L. et al., 2001: Selection effects of air pollution on gene pools of Norway spruce, European silver fir and European beech. Environmental Pollution, 115: 405-411.10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00230-5
  20. Mitton J.B., 1983: Conifers. In: S.D. Tanksley, T.J. Orton (eds.): Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Part B. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 443-472.10.1016/B978-0-444-42227-9.50025-1
  21. Monserud A., 1975: Trials with program FOREST: Growth and reproduction simulation for mixed species even- or uneven- aged forest stands. In: Fries J. (ed.): Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Royal College of Forestry, Research Notes, 30: 56-73.
  22. Müller-Starck G., Hussendörfer E., 1995: Conservation of genetic resources of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) in Switzerland. Euforgen, IPGRI, 41-43.
  23. Nei M., 1978: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89: 583-590.10.1093/genetics/89.3.583121385517248844
  24. Rajora O.P., 1999: Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theor. Appl. Genet., 99: 954-961.10.1007/s001220051402
  25. Sebenn A.M., Degen B., Azevedo V.C.R. et al., 2008: Modelling the long-term impacts of selective logging on genetic diversity and demographic structure of four tropical tree species in the Amazon forest. Forest ecology and management, 254(2): 335-349.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.009
  26. Sokal R.R., Oden N.L., 1981: Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10: 199-228.10.1111/j.1095-8312.1978.tb00013.x
  27. Sokal, R., Rohlf, J.,F., 1981: Biometry. WH Freeman & Co, New York - San Francisco, 859 s.
  28. Yazdani R., Lindgren D., 1991: The impact o f selfpollination on production of sound selfed seeds. In: S. Fineschi, M.E. Malvolti, F. Cannata, H.H. Hattemer (eds.): The Population Genetics of Forest Trees, SPB Academic Publishing, the Hague, p. 143-147.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10114-011-0004-0 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 96 - 112
Published on: Jul 20, 2011
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2011 Marian Pacalaj, Dušan Gömöry, Roman Longauer, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)