Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Carbon allocation in forest ecosystem - case studies from young pine stands Cover

Carbon allocation in forest ecosystem - case studies from young pine stands

Open Access
|Mar 2010

References

  1. Brunner I., Godbold D. L., 2007: Tree roots in a changing world. J. For. Res., 12, p. 78 - 82.10.1007/s10310-006-0261-4
  2. Cienciala E., Černý M., Tatarinov F. A., Apltauer J., Exnerová Z., 2006: Biomass functions applicable to Scots pine. Trees 20, p. 483 - 495.10.1007/s00468-006-0064-4
  3. Claesson S., Sahlén K., Lundmark T., 2001: Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. from stands in northern Sweden with high stand densities. Scand. J. For. Res., 16, p. 138 - 146.10.1080/028275801300088206
  4. Curiel Yuste J., Konôpka B., Janssens I.A., Coenen K., Xiao C.W., Ceulemans R., 2005: Contrasting net primary productivity and carbon distribution between neighbouring stands of Quercus robur and Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiol., 25, p. 701 - 712.10.1093/treephys/25.6.701
  5. Harmon M.E., Sexton J., 1996: Guidelines for Measurements of Woody Detritus in Forest Ecosystems. Publication No. 20. US Long-term Ecological Research Network Office, University of Washington.
  6. Helmisaari H. S., Makkonen K., Kellomäki S., Valtonen E., Mälkonen S., 2002: Below- and above-ground biomass, production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland. For. Ecol. Manage, 165, p. 317 - 326.10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00648-X
  7. IPCC, 2003: Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry.
  8. Jalkanen A., Mäkipää R., Stahl G., Peterson H., 2005: Estimation of the biomass stock of trees in Sweden: comparison of biomass equations and age-dependant biomass expansion factors. Ann. For. Sci., 62, p. 845 - 851.10.1051/forest:2005075
  9. King J.S., Giardina C.P., Pregitzer K.S., Friend A.L., 2007: Biomass partitioning in red pine (Pinus resinosa) along a chronosequence in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Canad. J. For. Res., 37, p. 93 - 102.10.1139/x06-217
  10. Konôpka B., Tsukahara H., Netsu A., 2000: Biomass distribution in 40-year-old trees of Japanese black pine. J. For. Res., 5, p. 163 - 168.10.1007/BF02762396
  11. Konôpka B., Pajtík J., Lukac M., 2009: Biomas partitioning and growth efficiency in four naturally regenerated forest tree species. Basic and Applied Ecology (v tlači).10.1016/j.baae.2010.02.004
  12. Lehtonen A., Mäkipää R., Heikkinen J., Sievänen R., Liski J., 2004: Biomass expansion factors (BEF) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage., 188, p. 211 - 224.10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008
  13. Matthews G., 1993: The carbon content of trees. Forestry Commission Technical Paper No. 4. Edinburgh U.K.
  14. Minďáš J., Škvarenina J. a kol., 2003: Lesy Slovenska a globálne klimatické zmeny. Zvolen, EFRA, LVÚ Zvolen, 129 s.
  15. Ovington J.D., 1957: Dry matter production in Pinus sylvestris L. Ann. Bot. (London) 21, p. 287 - 314.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083565
  16. Pajtík J., Konôpka B., Lukac M., 2008: Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) trees. For. Ecol. Manage, 256, p. 1 096 - 1 103.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.013
  17. Pavlenda P., 2008: Kvantifikácia zásob uhlíka v lesných pôdach. In Kobza J. (ed.): Piate pôdoznalecké dni. Pôda - národné bohatstvo. Zborník z medzinárodnej konferencie, ktorá sa konala 15. - 16. 10. 2008 v Sielnici, Bratislava, VÚPOP, s. 243 - 250.
  18. Priwitzer T., Pajtík J., Konôpka B., Pavlenda P., Ištoňa J., 2008: Kvantifikácia uhlíkových zásob v smrekových porastoch prvého vekového stupňa. Lesn. Čas. - Forestry Journal, 54, Supplement 1: 69 - 79.
  19. Semechkina M.G. 1978: Struktura fitomassy sosnaykov. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 126 s.
  20. Smith P., Nabuurs G-J., Janssens I., Reis S., Marland G., Soussana J.-F., Christensen T.R., Heath L., Apps M., Alexeyev V., Fang J.Y., Gattuso J.-P., Guerschman J.P., Huang Y., Jobbagy E., Murdiyarso D., Ni J., Nobre A., Peng C.H., Walcroft A., Wang S.Q., Pan Y., Zhou G.S., 2008: Sectoral approaches to improve regional carbon budgets. Climatic Change 88, p. 209 - 249.10.1007/s10584-007-9378-5
  21. Yanai R.D., Currie W.S., Goodale C.L., 2003: Soil carbon dynamics after forest harvest: an ecosystem paradigm reconsidered. Ecosystems, 56, p. 197 - 212.10.1007/s10021-002-0206-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10114-009-0007-2 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 239 - 250
Published on: Mar 13, 2010
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2010 Tibor Priwitzer, Jozef Pajtík, Bohdan Konôpka, Jozef Ištoňa, Pavel Pavlenda, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 55 (2009): Issue 3 (September 2009)