Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Party Patronage and State Politicisation in The Post- Communist Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A Game Theory Approach Cover

Party Patronage and State Politicisation in The Post- Communist Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A Game Theory Approach

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Volume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2013
References

References

  1. Armingeon, Klaus, David Weisstanner, Sarah Engler, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlene Gerber and Philipp Leimgruber. 2012..
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Available at http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_ger.html (last accessed 30 August 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Beblavy, Misroslav, Emilia Sicakova-Beblava and Darina Ondrusova. 2012. “Understanding Reasons and Implications of Agency Management ‘Politicization’: Parties vs Ministers.” Paper presented at the Fifth Trans-European Dialogue in Public Administration “The Politics of Agency Governance”, 1 - 3 February, Budapest, Hungary.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bennich-Bjorkman, Li. 2006. “Building Post-Communist States: Political Corruption and Strategies of Party Formation in Estonia and Latvia.” In Sven Eliaeson (ed.).. New York: Routledge, 288 - 305.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bouckaert, Geert. 2009. “Public Sector Reform in CEE Countries: An Introduction.” In Geert Bouckaert, Juraj Nemec, Vitalis Nakrošis, Gyorgy Hajnalm and Kristiina Tonnisson (eds).. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 13 - 24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Drengsgaard, Linda and Ole Hersted Hansen. 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Demstar Research Report No. 19, University of Aarhus. Available at http:// www.demstar.dk (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Economist, The. 2012.. 14 July. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/21558575 (last accessed 30 August 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. EurActiv. 2012.. 19 July. Available at http:// www.euractiv.com/central-europe/video-barroso-romania-shaken-eunews-514013 (last accessed 30 August 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Geddes, Barbara. 1996.. Berkeley, London & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennet. 2005.. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Gudžinskas, Liutauras. 2012.šalių[Transformation of postcommunist states and their welfare regimes: comparative analysis of Baltic countries]. PhD dissertation. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press. [in Lithuanian] Gwiazda, Anna. 2008. “Party Patronage in Poland: The Democratic Left Alliance and Law and Justice Compared”.22, 802 - 27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hanley, Sean. 2008. “Re-stating Party Development in Central and Eastern Europe ?”44(6), 1155 - 1176.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transition.”50(2), 203 - 234.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kray and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2011.. Available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/resources.htm (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Kemahlioglu, Ozge. 2012.. Colchester, Essex: ECPR Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kitschelt, Herbert, Zdenka Mansfeldova, Radoslaw Markowski and Gabor Toka. 1999.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Kopecky, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis.”22(3), 251 - 273.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kopecky, Petr and Peter Mair. 2011. “Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe: Principles and Practices.”RSCAS 2011 / 41. Available at http://www.eui.eu/Projects/EUDO/Documents/2011/eudoworkingpaperkopeckymair.pdf (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kopecky, Petr, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova (eds). 2012.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Kopecky, Petr, Gerardo Scherlis and Maria Spirova. 2008. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Party Patronage.”25 (September), 1 - 18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Kopecky, Petr and Maria Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.”34(5), 897 - 921.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, Paul. 2006. “Party Systems in Post-Communist Central Europe: Patterns of Stability and Consolidation.”13(4), 562 - 583.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Mair, Peter. 1997.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2011. “The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe aft er Accession.”24(2), 231 - 260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009a.. Paris: OECD-SIGMA Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009b. “Varieties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Legacy Explanations of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe.”75(3), 509 - 528.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2008. “The Changing Colours of the Post-Communist State: The Politicisation of the Senior Civil Service in Hungary.”47, 1 - 33.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik and Tim Veen. 2012. “Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe.”28(1), 4 - 22.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik and Kutsal Yesilkagit. 2011. “Differential Legacy Effects: Three Propositions on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Public Administration Reform in Europe East and West.”18(2), 311 - 322.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Nakrošis, Vitalis and Mantas Budraitis. 2012. “Longitudinal change in Lithuanian agencies: 1990 - 2010”35, 820 - 831.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Nakrošis, Vitalis and Žilvinas Martinaitis (eds). 2011.. Vilnius: Vilnius University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Nakrošis, Vitalis and Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling. 2009. “Modernising the Lithuanian Civil Service.” Unpublished paper.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Norkus, Zenonas. 2012.. Budapest: Central European University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Norkus, Zenonas. 2011. “Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Post-Communist Development in the Comparative Perspective.” In Marju Lauristin (ed.).. Tallinn: Eesti Koostoogu, 22 - 30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Nowak, Martin and Roger Highfield. 2011.. New York: Free Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. O’Dwyer, Conor. 2006.. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. OECD / SIGMA. 2003.. OECD / SIGMA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Osborne, Martin J. 2004.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework”.39(1), 7 - 27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Ostrom, Elinor. 2005.. Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Palidauskaitė, Jolanta. 2011. “Retrospektyvus žvilgsnis į etikos problemas Lietuvos valstybės tarnyboje: naujos problemos, jų turinys ar raiškos formos ?” [Retrospective look at the problems of ethics in the Lithuanian public service: new problems, their content and forms of expression ?]4(64), 39 - 72. [in Lithuanian] Peters, B. Guy and John Pierre (eds). 2004.. London: Routledge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Pettai, Vello, Daunis Auers and Ainė Ramonaitė. 2011. “Political Development.” In Marju Lauristin (ed.).. Tallinn: Eesti Koostoogu.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Ragin, Charles C. 1987.. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Ramonaitė, Ainė. 2008. “Changing Nature of Partisanship in a Post-Communist Society: Comparing ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Parties in Lithuania.”, 91 - 110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Rose, Richard and Neil Munro. 2009.. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (eds). 2005.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Steinberg, Paul F. 2007. “Causal Assessment in Small-N Policy Studies”.35(2), 181 - 204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Valstybės tarnybos departamentas prie VRM [Civil Service Department under the Ministry of the Interior]. 2007.įstatymoįgyvendinimoVilnius [2006 report on the application and implementation of the Civil Service Law and the legal acts related to it]. Available at http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?302204322 (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Verheijen, Tony and David Coombes (eds). 1998.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Willerton, John P. 2009 [1992].. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. World Bank. 2006.Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-012-0007-y | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309 | Journal ISSN: 1337-9038
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 120
Published on: May 16, 2013
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Political science,
Local government and administration

© 2013 Vitalis Nakrošis, Liutauras Gudžinskas, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
Previous article
Next article