Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Party Patronage and State Politicisation in The Post- Communist Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A Game Theory Approach Cover

Party Patronage and State Politicisation in The Post- Communist Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A Game Theory Approach

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy
Volume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
By: Vitalis Nakrošis and  Liutauras Gudžinskas  
Open Access
|May 2013

References

  1. Armingeon, Klaus, David Weisstanner, Sarah Engler, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlene Gerber and Philipp Leimgruber. 2012. Comparative Political Data Set III.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Available at http://www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/team/klaus_armingeon/comparative_political_data_sets/index_ger.html (last accessed 30 August 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Beblavy, Misroslav, Emilia Sicakova-Beblava and Darina Ondrusova. 2012. “Understanding Reasons and Implications of Agency Management ‘Politicization’: Parties vs Ministers.” Paper presented at the Fifth Trans-European Dialogue in Public Administration “The Politics of Agency Governance”, 1 - 3 February, Budapest, Hungary.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bennich-Bjorkman, Li. 2006. “Building Post-Communist States: Political Corruption and Strategies of Party Formation in Estonia and Latvia.” In Sven Eliaeson (ed.). Building Democracy and Civil Society East of the Elbe: Essays inHonour of Edmund Mokrzycki. New York: Routledge, 288 - 305.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bouckaert, Geert. 2009. “Public Sector Reform in CEE Countries: An Introduction.” In Geert Bouckaert, Juraj Nemec, Vitalis Nakrošis, Gyorgy Hajnalm and Kristiina Tonnisson (eds). Public Management Reforms in Central andEastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 13 - 24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Drengsgaard, Linda and Ole Hersted Hansen. 2004. State of the State in Lithuania.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Demstar Research Report No. 19, University of Aarhus. Available at http:// www.demstar.dk (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Economist, The. 2012. Putsch-up Job. 14 July. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/21558575 (last accessed 30 August 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. EurActiv. 2012. Barroso: Romania Has Shaken EU Trust. 19 July. Available at http:// www.euractiv.com/central-europe/video-barroso-romania-shaken-eunews-514013 (last accessed 30 August 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Geddes, Barbara. 1996. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley, London & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennet. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Developmentin the Social Sciences. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618819
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Gudžinskas, Liutauras. 2012. Pokomunistinių valstybių ir jų gerovės režimų transformacija:Baltijos šalių lyginamoji analizė [Transformation of postcommunist states and their welfare regimes: comparative analysis of Baltic countries]. PhD dissertation. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press. [in Lithuanian] Gwiazda, Anna. 2008. “Party Patronage in Poland: The Democratic Left Alliance and Law and Justice Compared”. East European Politics & Societies 22, 802 - 27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hanley, Sean. 2008. “Re-stating Party Development in Central and Eastern Europe ?” Czech Sociological Review 44(6), 1155 - 1176.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transition.” World Politics 50(2), 203 - 234.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kray and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2011. Worldwide GovernanceIndicators 1996 - 2010. Available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/resources.htm (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Kemahlioglu, Ozge. 2012. Agents or Bosses ? Patronage and Intra-Party Politics inArgentina and Turkey. Colchester, Essex: ECPR Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kitschelt, Herbert, Zdenka Mansfeldova, Radoslaw Markowski and Gabor Toka. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139175173
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kopecky, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis.” Journal of Communist studies and Transition Politics 22(3), 251 - 273.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kopecky, Petr and Peter Mair. 2011. “Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe: Principles and Practices.” EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2011 / 41. Available at http://www.eui.eu/Projects/EUDO/Documents/2011/eudoworkingpaperkopeckymair.pdf (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kopecky, Petr, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova (eds). 2012. Party Patronage and PartyGovernment in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599370.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Kopecky, Petr, Gerardo Scherlis and Maria Spirova. 2008. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Party Patronage.” Political Concepts, Committee on Concepts andMethods Working Paper Series 25 (September), 1 - 18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Kopecky, Petr and Maria Spirova. 2011. “‘Jobs for the Boys’? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34(5), 897 - 921.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, Paul. 2006. “Party Systems in Post-Communist Central Europe: Patterns of Stability and Consolidation.” Democratization 13(4), 562 - 583.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approach and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198295499.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2011. “The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe aft er Accession.” Governance 24(2), 231 - 260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009a. Post-Accession Sustainability of Civil Service Reformin Central and Eastern Europe. Paris: OECD-SIGMA Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2009b. “Varieties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Legacy Explanations of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(3), 509 - 528.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2008. “The Changing Colours of the Post-Communist State: The Politicisation of the Senior Civil Service in Hungary.” EuropeanJournal of Political Research 47, 1 - 33.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik and Tim Veen. 2012. “Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 28(1), 4 - 22.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik and Kutsal Yesilkagit. 2011. “Differential Legacy Effects: Three Propositions on the Impact of Administrative Traditions on Public Administration Reform in Europe East and West.” Journal of European PublicPolicy 18(2), 311 - 322.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Nakrošis, Vitalis and Mantas Budraitis. 2012. “Longitudinal change in Lithuanian agencies: 1990 - 2010”. International Journal of Public Administration 35, 820 - 831.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Nakrošis, Vitalis and Žilvinas Martinaitis (eds). 2011. Lithuanian Agencies and OtherPublic Sector Organisations: Organisation, Autonomy, Control and Performance. Vilnius: Vilnius University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Nakrošis, Vitalis and Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling. 2009. “Modernising the Lithuanian Civil Service.” Unpublished paper.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Norkus, Zenonas. 2012. On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania. Budapest: Central European University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Norkus, Zenonas. 2011. “Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Post-Communist Development in the Comparative Perspective.” In Marju Lauristin (ed.). EstonianHuman Development Report 2010 / 2011: Baltic Way(s) of Human Development:Twenty Years On. Tallinn: Eesti Koostoogu, 22 - 30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Nowak, Martin and Roger Highfield. 2011. SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution,and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. New York: Free Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. O’Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and DemocraticDevelopment. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. OECD / SIGMA. 2003. Lithuania: Public Service and the Administrative FrameworkAssessment. OECD / SIGMA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Osborne, Martin J. 2004. An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework”. The Policy Studies Journal 39(1), 7 - 27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Palidauskaitė, Jolanta. 2011. “Retrospektyvus žvilgsnis į etikos problemas Lietuvos valstybės tarnyboje: naujos problemos, jų turinys ar raiškos formos ?” [Retrospective look at the problems of ethics in the Lithuanian public service: new problems, their content and forms of expression ?] Politologija 4(64), 39 - 72. [in Lithuanian] Peters, B. Guy and John Pierre (eds). 2004. Politicization of the Civil Service in ComparativePerspective: The Quest for Control. London: Routledge.10.15388/Polit.2011.4.8260
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Pettai, Vello, Daunis Auers and Ainė Ramonaitė. 2011. “Political Development.” In Marju Lauristin (ed.). Estonian Human Development Report 2010 / 2011: BalticWay(s) of Human Development: Twenty Years On. Tallinn: Eesti Koostoogu.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative andQuantitative Strategies. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Ramonaitė, Ainė. 2008. “Changing Nature of Partisanship in a Post-Communist Society: Comparing ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Parties in Lithuania.” Lithuanian PoliticalScience Yearbook 2007, 91 - 110.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Rose, Richard and Neil Munro. 2009. Parties and Elections in New European Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (eds). 2005. The Europeanization ofCentral and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Steinberg, Paul F. 2007. “Causal Assessment in Small-N Policy Studies”. The PolicyStudies Journal 35(2), 181 - 204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Valstybės tarnybos departamentas prie VRM [Civil Service Department under the Ministry of the Interior]. 2007. Valstybės tarnybos įstatymo ir su juo susijusiųteisės aktų taikymo ir įgyvendinimo ataskaita už 2006 m. Vilnius [2006 report on the application and implementation of the Civil Service Law and the legal acts related to it]. Available at http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?302204322 (last accessed 30 May 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Verheijen, Tony and David Coombes (eds). 1998. Innovations in Public Management:Perspectives from East and West Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Willerton, John P. 2009 [1992]. Patronage and the Politics in the USSR. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. World Bank. 2006. Administrative Capacity in the New EU Member States: The Limitsof Innovation ? Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10110-012-0007-y | Journal eISSN: 1338-4309
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 120
Published on: May 16, 2013
Published by: NISPAcee
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Political science,
Local government and administration

© 2013 Vitalis Nakrošis, Liutauras Gudžinskas, published by NISPAcee
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)Next article