Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Some linguistic and pragmatic considerations affecting science reporting in English by non-native speakers of the language Cover

Some linguistic and pragmatic considerations affecting science reporting in English by non-native speakers of the language

Open Access
|Nov 2012

References

  1. Benfield JR, Howard KM. (2000). The language of science.: 642-648.
  2. Benfield JR, Feak CB. (2006). How authors can cope with the burden of English as an international language.: 1728-1730.
  3. Borkin A. (1979). On some conjuncts signaling dissonance in written expository English.: 95-116.
  4. Ferguson G, Perez-Llantada C, Plo R. (2011). English as an international language of scientific publication: a study of attitudes.1): 41-59.
  5. Fiedler S. (2011). English as a lingua franca - a native-culture free code? Language of communication versus language of identifi cation.3): 79-97.
  6. Gannon F. (2007). Address bias.(EMBO) J5)421
  7. Golebiowski Z. (2006). The distribution of discoursal salience in research papers: relational hypotaxis and parataxis.259-277.
  8. Hinkel E. (1999). Objectivity and credibility in L1 and L2 academic wriring, in(Hinkel E. ed.) pp. 1-40, Cambridge Univ. Press.
  9. Hinkel E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts.2): 111-132.
  10. Hyland K. (2006). Medical discourse: hedges, in(Brown K. ed.) pp. 694-697, 2nd ed. Elsevier, Oxford.
  11. Kies D. (1990). Indeterminacy in sentence structure.3): 231-258.
  12. Knight J. (2003). Scientifi c literacy: Clear as mud.: 376-378.
  13. Ludbrook J. (2007). Writing intelligible English prose for biomedical journals.: 508-514.
  14. Kourilova M. (1992). Functional approaches to understanding scientifi c discourse.2): 20-28.
  15. Kourilova M. (1995). Some linguistic and cultural aspects of scientifi c discourse processing.(2): 120-130.
  16. Kourilova M. (1998) Communicative characteristics of reviews of scientifi c papers written by non-native users of English.: 107-114.
  17. Lock S. (1991).. Third impression 1991, British Medical Journal, London.
  18. Perez-Llantada C. (2007). Native and non-native English scholars publishing research internationally: a small-scale study on authorial (in)visibility.(2): 217-238.
  19. Peters DP, Ceci SJ (1982). Peer review practices in psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again.: 187-195.
  20. Rohrauer L., Dubec P. (2001). Syntactic and FSP aspects in existential construction.(1): 24-32.
  21. Seidlhofer B. (2003).Council of Europe, pp. 1-28.
  22. Sperber D, Clement F, Heink C, Mascaro O, Mercier H, Origgi G, Wilson D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance.(4): 359-393.
  23. Widdowson H. (1994). The ownership of English.(2): 377-389.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-012-0018-1 | Journal eISSN: 1337-9569 | Journal ISSN: 1337-6853
Language: English
Page range: 105 - 115
Published on: Nov 9, 2012
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology & Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Magda Kourilova-Urbanczik, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology & Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.