Review of skin irritation/corrosion hazards on the basis of human data: a regulatory perspective
By: David Basketter, Dagmar Jírova and Helena Kandárová
Open Access
|Nov 2012References
- Basketter DA. (1994). Strategic hierarchical approaches in acute toxicity testing.: 855-859.
- Basketter DA, Whittle E, Griffi ths HA, York M. (1994a). The identifi cation and classification of skin irritation hazard by human patch test.
- :: 769-775.
- Basketter DA, Whittle E, Chamberlain M. (1994b). Identifi cation of irritationand corrosion hazards to skin: an alternative strategy to animal testing.: 539-542.
- Basketter DA, Griffi ths HA, Wang XM, Wilhelm K-P, McFadden J. (1996a). Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test.: 208-213.
- Basketter D A, Blaikie L, Reynolds F. (1996b.) The impact of atopy on a predictive test of acute skin irritation potential.: 33-39.
- Basketter DA, Chamberlain M, Griffi ths HA, York M. (1997). The classification of skin irritants by human patch test.: 845-852.
- Basketter DA, York M, McFadden JP, Robinson MK. (2004). Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test.: 1-4.
- Campbell RL, Bruce RD. (1981). Comparative dermatotoxicology. I. Direct comparison of rabbit and human primary skin irritation responses to isopropylmyristate.: 555-563.
- Commission Regulation (EC). (2009). No 761/2009 of 23 July 2009 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).
- Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. (1944). Methods for the study of imitation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes.: 377-390.
- Draize JH. (1959). Dermal Toxicity. In Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics, Association of Foods and Drugs Offi cials of the United States, Littleton, CO, USA., 46-59 p.
- ECHA (2008a), ECHA Reference: ECHA - 09-G-02-EN. Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria. Guidance to Regulation (EC) No1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures. http://www.iss.it/binary/cnsc/cont/Guida_CLP_II.pdf, last accessed 26/3/2012.
- ECHA. (2008b). R.7.2. Skin- and eye irritation/corrosion and respiratory irritation. In: Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7a: Endpoint Specifi c Guidance, p. 199-255. Available at: http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r7a_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08. Last accessed on 07.02.2011.
- Eskes C, Barroso J, Basketter DA. (2012).approaches to the assessment of skin irritation and phototoxicity of topically applied materails, in(Wilhelm K-P, Zhai H, Maibach HI eds), 534 p, Informa Healthcare, 8th edition, London, UK
- Gibbs S. (2009).irritation models and immune reactions.: 103-113.
- Griffiths HA, Wilhelm K-P, Robinson MK, York M, Basketter DA. (1996). Interlaboratory evaluation of a human 4h patch test for the evaluation of skin irritation potential/hazard.: 255-260.
- Jirova D, Basketter D, Liebsch M, Bendova H, Keilova K, Marriott M, Kandarova H. (2010). Comparison of human skin irritation patch test data withskin irritation assays and animal data.109-116.
- McFadden J, Wakelin S, Basketter DA. (1997). Irritant thresholds in Type I-VI skin.: 147-149.
- Nixon GA, Tyson CA, Wertz WC. (1975). Interspecies comparisons of skin irritancy.: 481-490.
- Phillips L, Steinberg M, Maibach HI, Akers WA. (1972). A comparison of rabbit and human skin response to certain irritants.: 369-382.
- Robinson MK, Kruszewski FH, Al-Atrash J, Blazka ME, Gingell R, Heitfeld FA, Mallon D, Snyder NK, Swanson JE, Casterton PL. (2005). Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.: 1703-1712.
- Robinson MK, McFadden JP, Basketter DA. (2001). Validity and ethics of the human 4 hour patch test as an alternative method to assess acute skin irritation potential.: 1-12.
- Robinson MK, Perkins MA, Basketter DA. (1998). Application of a four hour human patch test method for comparative and investigative assessment of skin irritation.: 194-202.
- Robinson MK, Whittle E, Basketter DA. (1999). A two center study of the development of acute irritation responses to fatty acids.: 136-145.
- United Nations-Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) (2009). Globally Harmonised System of Classifi cation and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Updated Part 3 Health and Environmental Hazards - Chapter 3.3 Serious eye damage / eye irritation. New York, USA, and Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. p.133-144. Available at:
- Welss T, Basketter DA, Schröder KR. (2004).skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models.: 231-243.
- York M, Griffi ths HA, Whittle E, Basketter DA. (1996). Evaluation of a human patch test for the identifi cation and classifi cation of skin irritation potential.: 204-212.
Language: English
Page range: 98 - 104
Published on: Nov 9, 2012
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology & Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2012 David Basketter, Dagmar Jírova, Helena Kandárová, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology & Toxicology, Centre of Experimental Medicine
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.