Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Short-time measurements of interception in mountain spruce forest Cover

Short-time measurements of interception in mountain spruce forest

By: Ladislav Holko  
Open Access
|Dec 2010

References

  1. BENETIN J., 1983: Analytical solution of relationship between transpiration and evaporation from interception. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., vol. 31, no. 3-4, 354-368.
  2. BENETIN J., NOVÁK V., ŠOLTÉSZ A., ŠTEKAUEROVÁ V., 1986: Rain interception and its influence on water balance of the vegetation cover. (In Slovak.) J. Hydrol. Hydromech, vol. 43, no. 1, 3-24.
  3. CALDER I., 1986: A stochastic model of rainfall interception. J. Hydrol., 89, 65-71.10.1016/0022-1694(86)90143-5
  4. FRIESEN J., VAN BEEK C., SELKER J., SAVENIJE H. H. G., and VAN DE GIESEN N., 2008: Tree rainfall interception measured by stem compression. Water Resour. Res., 44, W00D15, doi:10.1029/2008WR007074.10.1029/2008WR007074
  5. GASH J., 1979: An analytical model of rainfall interception by forest. Quarterly J. of the Royal Meteorolog. Soc., 105, 43-55.10.1002/qj.49710544304
  6. HALMOVÁ D., PEKÁROVÁ P., MIKLÁNEK P., 2006: Rainfall interception in hornbeam and spruce forest in Slovakia. Meteorol. J., vol. 9, no. 3-4, 123-130.
  7. HELVEY J. D., PATRIC J. H., 1965: Canopy and Litter Interception of Rainfall by Hardwoods of Eastern United States. Wat. Resour. Res., 1, 2, 193-206.10.1029/WR001i002p00193
  8. HOLKO L., ŠKVARENINA J., KOSTKA Z., FRIČ M., STAROŇ, J., 2009: Impact of spruce forest on rainfall interception and seasonal snow cover evolution in the Western Tatra Mountains, Slovakia. Biologia, 64/3, Section Botany, 594-599, DOI: 10.2478/s11756-009-0087-6.10.2478/s11756-009-0087-6
  9. HOLWERDA, F., SCATENA, F. N., BRUIJNZEEL, L. A., 2006: Throughfall in a Puerto Rican lower montane rain forest: A comparison of sampling strategies. J. Hydrol., 327, 592-602.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.014
  10. HORVÁT O., HLAVČOVÁ K., KOHNOVÁ S., DANKO M., 2009: Application of the FRIER distributed model for estimating the impact of and use changes on the water balance in selected basins in Slovakia. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., vol. 57, no. 4, 213-225.10.2478/v10098-009-0020-2
  11. KEIM R. F., SKRAUGSET A. E., WEILER M. 2005: Temporal persistence of spatial patterns in throughfall. J. Hydrol., 314, 263-274.
  12. KREČMER V., 1952: Influence of forests on precipitation. (In Czech.) Meteorol. zprávy, vol. 5, no. 4, 106-116.
  13. LANČARIČ P., MINĎÁŠ J., ŠKVARENINA J., 2001: Forest stand intercepion in mountain catchment in the Low Tatras. (In Slovak.) Bioklimatologické pracovné dni 2001: Extrémy prostredia (počasia) - limitujúce faktory bioklimatologických procesov, Račkova dolina, Slovakia.
  14. LIU J., 1988: A theoretical model if the process of rainfall interception in forest canopy. Ecological Modelling, pp. 111-123.10.1016/0304-3800(88)90111-1
  15. MAJERČÁKOVÁ O., 1983: Interception as component influencing runoff generation from precipitation in forest biomes. (In Slovak.) [PhD Thesis.] Ústav hydrológie a hydrauliky SAV, Bratislava, 95 pp.
  16. MASSMAN W., 1983: The derivation and validation of a new model for the interception of rainfall by forest. Agricultural Meteorology, 28, 261-286.10.1016/0002-1571(83)90031-6
  17. MIKLÁNEK P., PEKÁROVÁ P., 2006: Interception assessment in experimental microbasins of IH SAS with spruce and hornbeam vegetation. (In Slovak with an English abstract.) J. Hydrol. Hydromech., vol. 54, no. 2, 123-136.
  18. MINĎÁŠ J., 2001: Influence of rainfall intensity on interception process in midmountain forests of Poľana. In Slovak. Bioklimatologické pracovné dni 2001: Extrémy prostredia (počasia) - limitujúce faktory bioklimatologických procesov, Račkova dolina, Slovakia.
  19. MINĎÁŠ J., ŠKVARENINA J., STŘELCOVÁ K., 2001: Importance of forests in the landscape hydrological regime. (In Slovak.) Životné prostredie, vol. 35, no. 3.
  20. MULDER J. 1985: Simulating interception loss using standard meteorological data. In: Hutchison B., Hicks B. (Eds.), The Forest-Atmosphere Interaction. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 77-196.
  21. MURAKAMI S., 2007: Application of three canopy interception models to a young stand of Japanese cypress and interpretation in terms of interception mechanism. J. Hydrol., 342, 305-319.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.032
  22. MUZYLO A., LLORENS P., VALENTE F., KEIZER J. J., DOMINGO F., GASH J. H. C., 2009. A review of rainfall interception modeling. J. Hydrol., 370, 191-206.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.058
  23. PEKÁROVÁ P., KONÍČEK A., MIKLÁNEK P., 2005: Impact of land use on runoff regime in experimental microbasins of IH SAS. (In Slovak.) Bratislava, Veda, 216 pp.
  24. RUTTER A., KERSHAW K., ROBINS P., MORTON A., 1971: A predictive model of rainfall interception in forest. 1. Derivation of the model from observation in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agricultural Meteorology, 9, 367-384.10.1016/0002-1571(71)90034-3
  25. SAVENIJE H. H. G., 2004: The importance of interception and why we should delete the term evapotranspiration from our vocabulary. Invited Commentary. Hydrol. Process., 18, 1507-1511.10.1002/hyp.5563
  26. TUŽINSKÝ L., 1995: The effect of felling intensity on the components of water balance in spruce ecosystem. Lesníc. Čas., 41, no. 4, 231-241.
  27. VALTÝNI J., 1986: Water management and flood protection role of the forest. (In Slovak.) Lesnícke štúdie VÚLH vo Zvolene, 38, 68 pp.
  28. VRUGT J. A., DEKKER S. C., BOUTEN W., 2003: Identification of rainfall interception model parameters from measurements of throughfall and forest canopy storage. Water Resour. Res., 39, no. 9, 1251, doi:10.1029/2003WR002013.10.1029/2003WR002013
  29. XIAO Q., MCPHERSON E. G., USTIN S. L., GRISMER M. E., 2000: A new approach to modeling tree rainfall interception. Water Resour. Res., 105, no. D23, 29173-29188.10.1029/2000JD900343
  30. ZELENÝ V., TICHÝ J., 1968: Snow conditions in a spruce stand and on a cut area in the Moravian-Silesian Beskydes. (In Czech.) Lesnic. Čas., 14, (XLI), 803-816.
  31. ZENG N., SHUTTLEWORTH J., GASH J., 2000: Influence of temporal variability of rainfallon interception loss. Part 1. Point analysis. J. Hydrol., 228, 228-241.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00140-2
  32. ZIMMERMANN B., ZIMMERMANN A., LARK R. M., ELSENBEER H., 2010: Sampling procedures for throughfall monitoring: A simulation study, Wat. Resour. Res., 46, W01503, doi:10.1029/2009WR007776.10.1029/2009WR007776
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10098-010-0020-2 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4333 | Journal ISSN: 0042-790X
Language: English
Page range: 213 - 220
Published on: Dec 8, 2010
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2010 Ladislav Holko, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 58 (2010): Issue 4 (December 2010)