Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Changes in the rural elementary schools network in Czechia during the second half of the 20th century and its possible impact on rural areas Cover

Changes in the rural elementary schools network in Czechia during the second half of the 20th century and its possible impact on rural areas

European Countryside
Volume 1 (2009): Issue 3 (September 2009)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2009
References

References

  1. Andrle, A. (1995). Vylidňování venkova v České republice 1961-1991., 1, 28-29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bašovský, O. & Mládek, J. (1989).Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bell, A. & Sigsworth, A. (1987). TheLondon: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Blažek, B. (2004).Brno: ERA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bladford, M. (1991). School-performance indicators, the local residential environment, and parental choice., A 23, 319-322.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, M. G. & Grady, M. L. (1990). Community Factors Threatening Rural School District Stability.6(3), 21-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chromý, P. & Janů, H. (2003). Regional identity, activation of territorial communities and the potential of the development of peripheral regions.38(1), 105-117.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1997). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. In Halsey, A. H., Lauder, H., Brown, P. & Wells, A. S. (Eds.),(pp. 81-95). Oxford: Oxford University Press,. (From94, Supplement (1998), p. 95-120).
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. DeYoung, A. J. (1987). The Status of American Rural Education Research: An Integrated Review and Commentary.57, 123-148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Dostál, P. & Markusse, J. D. (1989). Rural settlement networks and elementary service provision: two scenarios for the matching of demand and supply, in: Planning and the Future of the Countryside: Great Britain and the Netherlands. In Clark, G., Huigen, P. & Thissen, F. (Eds.),(pp. 62-78). Amsterdam: Netherlands Geographical Studies.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Emmerová, K. (2000). Malotřídky v současném prostředí českého venkova. In(pp. 81-96). Brno: Masaryk University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Fialová, L. et al. (1996).Praha: Mladá fronta.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Halsey, A. H., Lauder, H., Brown, P. & Wells, A. S. (Eds.) (1997).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hampl, M. (1998).Praha: Karolinum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hampl, M. (2004). Současný vývoj geografické organizace a změny v dojížd'ce za prací a do škol v Česku.109(3), 205-222.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Hampl, M. (2005).Praha: Charles University, Faculty of Science, Department of social geography and regional development.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Hampl, M., Gardavský, V. & Kühnl, K. (1987).Praha: Charles University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Hampl, M. & Müller, J. (1998). Jsou obce v České republice příliš malé?103(1), 1-12.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Hampl, M. et al. (2001).Praha: Charles University, Faculty of Science, Department of social geography and regional development.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Hintnaus, L. (ed.) (1969).České Budějovice: Pedagogická fakulta Jihočeské univerzity.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Jančák, V. (2001). Příspěvek ke geografickému výzkumu periferních oblastí na mikroregionální úrovni.106(1), 26-35.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Johnston, R. J. (2000). Education, geography of. In: Johnston, R. J. et al. (eds.):(pp. 203-204). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Kučera, Z. (2007a). Sídlo a obec: základní pojmy geografie osídlení a jejich vztah.112(1), 84-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Kučera, Z. (2007b). Zanikání sídel v pohraničí Čech po roce 1945 - základní analýza34, 317-334.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Kučera, Z. & Kuldová, S. (2006). Vnímání venkova: klíčový fenomén jeho rozvoje? In Majerová, V. (ed.):(pp. 406-414). Praha: Czech University of Life Science.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kvalsund, R. (2004).Volda: University College Volda (Research Report 58).
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Lyson, T. A. (2002). What Does a School Mean to a Community? Assessing the Social and Economic Benefits of Schools to Rural Villages in New York.17(3), 131-137.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Majerová, V. et al. (2003).Praha: Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Majerová, V. et al. (2005). Český venkov 2005: Rozvoj venkovské společnosti. Praha: Czech University of Life Sciences.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Marada, M. (2001). Vymezení periferních oblastí Česka a studium jejich znaků pomocí statistické analýzy.106(1), 12-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Marsden, W. E. (1977). Historical Geography and the History of Education.6(1), 21-42.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Maříková, P. (2006). Kde je venkov? Vymezení hranic venkova v podmínkách ČR. In Majerová, V. (Ed.),(pp. 432-444). Praha: Czech University of Life Sciences.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Miller, B. (1995). The Role of Rural Schools in Community Development: Policy Issues and Implications. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Mňuk, P. (1985).Unpublished master thesis. Charles University in Prague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Mokříšová, M. (1989):Unpublished master thesis. Charles University in Prague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Musil, J. (2002). Urbanizace českých zemí a socialismus. In Horská, P., Maur, E. & Musil, J. (Eds),(pp. 237-297). Praha and Litomyšl: Paseka.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Musil, J. (2008). Inner Peripheries of the Czech Republic as a Form of Social Exclusion. In Majerová, V. (Ed.),(pp. 425-441). Praha: Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Musil, J., Müller, J. (2008). Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze.44(2), 321-48.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Neate, S. (1981).Norwich: Geo Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Novotná, M., ed. (2005).Praha: Charles University, Faculty of Science, Department of social geography and regional development.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Pacione, M. (1984). Rural Geography. London: Harper & Row.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Perlín, R. (1999). Venkov, typologie venkovského prostoru. In(pp. 87-104) Praha: Cargo Publishers
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Perlín, R. (2003). Předpoklady rozvoje českého venkova. In: Vávra, V. (Ed.),Research institute of agricultural economics Prague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Průcha, J., Walterová, E. & Mareš, J. (2003).(4th ed.). Praha: Portál.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Sell, R., S., Leistritz, F. L. & Thompson, J. M. (1996). Socio-economic Impacts of School Consolidation on Host and Vacated Communities. Agricultural Economics Report No. 347.28, 186-205.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Tesárková, K. (2007).Unpublished master thesis. Charles University in Prague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Trnková, K. (2006). Vývoj malotřídních škol v druhé polovině 20. století. In:, p. 133-144. Brno:Masaryk University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Trnková, K. (2008a). Malotřídky a jejich obce: kde je najdeme, jak jsou velké, jaká je jejich občanská vybavenost a podíl málotřídek na ní? In, LVI, (in print).
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Trnková, K. (2008b): Village schools: wrinkles for mayors?1(2), 105-112, DOI: 10.2478/v10091/009-0009-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Wirth, L. (1996). Urbanism as a Way of Life. American Journal of Sociology (1938). In: Legates, R. T. & Stout, F. (Eds.),(pp. 189-197). London: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Zemánek, L. (2003). Lokální kultura v životě našeho venkova. In: Jančák, V., Chromý, P. & Marada, M. (Eds.), Geografie na cestách poznání (pp. 124-149). Praha: Charles University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Czech Statistical Office:Retrieved from
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Obce v číslech 1990. Regional divisions of the Czech Statistical Office 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Statistická ročenka školství 2003. Institute for Information on Education Prague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Statistika školství a kultury 1963. Bratislava.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Statistický lexikon obcí České republiky 2003. Praha: Czech Statistical Office 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Statistický lexikon obcí ČSSR 1965. Praha: Czech Statistical Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Zákon č. 128/2000 Sb. o obcích (obecní zřízení) v platném znění (Law on Municipalities).
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Zákon č. 561/2004 Sb. o předškolním, základním, středním, vyšším odborném a jiném vzdělávání (školský zákon) v platném znění (Law on Education).
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091/009-0011-7 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Czech, French, German
Page range: 125 - 140
Published on: Sep 15, 2009
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
elementary school network,
rural space,
spatial polarization,
municipalities,
Czechia
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2009 Silvie Kučerová, Zdeněk Kučera, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 1 (2009): Issue 3 (September 2009)
Next article