Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Rural development within the context of agricultural and socio-economic trends – the case of Finland Cover

Rural development within the context of agricultural and socio-economic trends – the case of Finland

By: Olli Voutilainen and  Olli Wuori  
Open Access
|Oct 2012

References

  1. Armstrong, H. & Taylor, J. (2000). Regional economics and policy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  2. Bollman, R. D. (2006). The Demographic Overlap of Agriculture and Rural Economy: Implications for the Coherence of Agriculture and Rural Policies. In Diakossavvas, D., Ed., Coherence of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies (pp. 95-112). Paris: OECD.
  3. Breman, B. C. & Pinto Correia, M. T. (2003). Coping with Marginalisation and Multifunctional Land use in Portugal - A national inventory for the Eurolan project. Departamento de Planeamento Biofísico e Paisagístico, Universidade de Évora.
  4. Breman, B., Vihinen, H., Tapio-Biström, M.-L. & Pinto Correia, T. (2010). Disentangling marginalisation processes at the periphery of Europe: a challenge for more diversified regional policies. Public Administration 88(2), 364-380. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9299.2010.01834.x.
  5. Cruickshank, J., Lysgård, H. K. & Magnussen, M.-L. (2009). The logic of the construction of rural politics: political discourses on rurality in Norway. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 91(1), 73-89. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00307.x. 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00307.x
  6. Diakossavvas, D. (Ed.) (2006). Coherence of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies. Paris: OECD.
  7. Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. (1966). Applied regression analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Dwyer, J., Ward, N., Lowe, P. & Baldock, D. (2007). European rural development under the Common Agricultural Policy’s ‘Second Pillar’: institutional conservatism and innovation. Regional Studies 41(7), 873-887. Doi: 10.1080/00343400601142795. 10.1080/00343400601142795
  9. Finnish Meteorological Institute a. Seasons in Finland. Cited: 27.2.2012. Available on Internet: http://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/seasons-in-finland.
  10. Finnish Meteorological Institute b. Terminen kasvukausi. Cited: 27.2.2012. Available on Internet: http://ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/terminen-kasvukausi.
  11. Gujarati, D. N. (1978). Basic Econometrics. Auckland: McGraw-Hill.
  12. Honkapohja, S. & Koskela, E. (1999). The economic crisis of the 1990’s in Finland. Economic Policy14(29), 400-436. 10.1111/1468-0327.00054
  13. Häkkilä, M. (1991). Some regional trends in Finnish farming with special reference to agricultural policy. Fennia 169(1), 39-56.
  14. Jonung, L., Söderström, H. T. & Stymne, J. (1996). Depression in the north – boom and bust in Sweden and Finland, 1985-93. Finnish Economic Papers 9(1), 55-71.
  15. Kangasharju, A. & Pekkala, S. (2004). Increasing Regional Disparities in the 1990s: The Finnish Experience. Regional Studies38(3), 255–267. Doi: 10.1080/003434042000211097. 10.1080/003434042000211097
  16. Katajamäki, H. (1991). Suomen maaseudun suuri kertomus. Terra103, 173-183.
  17. Knickel, K. & Renting, H. (2000). Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 512-528. Doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00164. 10.1111/1467-9523.00164
  18. Kuhmonen, T. (1996a). Maatalouden alueellinen rakennekehitys ja aluepolitiikka. Suomen Aluetutkimus FAR/Finnish Regional Research FAR, Selvityksiä/Research Papers 9.
  19. Kuhmonen, T. (1996b). Näkökulmia suomalaisen maatalouden ja maaseudun tulevaisuudesta pohjoisen tuen alueella. Finn-Auguuri, Maaseudun tulevaisuusselvityksiä 1.
  20. Kuhmonen, T. (1998). Agenda 2007 – Suomen maatalouden EU-historia ja tulevaisuus. Finn-Auguuri, Maaseudun tulevaisuusselvityksiä 4.
  21. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö (2008). Manner-Suomen maaseudun kehittämisohjelma 2007-2013. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriön julkaisuja8/2007.
  22. Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmä (2004). ELINVOIMAINEN MAASEUTU – yhteinen vastuumme. Maaseutupoliittinen kokonaisohjelma 2005-2008. Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmän julkaisu 10/2004.
  23. Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmä (2009). Maaseutu ja hyvinvoiva Suomi. Maaseutupoliittinen kokonaisohjelma 2009-2013. Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmän julkaisuja 5/2009.
  24. Malinen, P., Kytölä, L., Keränen, H. & Keränen, R. (2006). Suomen maaseututyypit 2006 (Summary: Rural typology of Finland in 2006). Maa- ja metsätalousministeriön julkaisuja 7/2006.
  25. Massey, D. & Meegan, R. (1982). The anatomy of job loss: the how, why and where of employment decline. London: Methuen.
  26. Mather, A. S., Hill, G. & Nijnik, M. (2006). Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization? Journal of Rural Studies22(4), 441-455. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.004. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.004
  27. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2002). Strategy for Renewable Natural Resources in Finland. Publications 8b/2001. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland.
  28. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2008). Rural Development Programme for Mainland Finland 2007-2013. CCI 2007 FI 06 RPO 001. Unofficial translation. Available onhttp://www.maaseutu.fi/attachments/newfolder_0/5yNX8hBfo/Rural_Development_Progr amme_for_Mainland_Finland_280411_EN.pdf. Accessed in 16.12.2011.01
  29. Muilu, T. & Rusanen, J. (2004). Rural definitions and short-term dynamics in rural areas of Finland in 1989-97. Environment and Planning A36(8), 1499-1516. Doi: 10.1068/a36169. 10.1068/a36169
  30. Niemi, J. & Ahlstedt, J. (Eds.) (2008). Finnish Agriculture and Rural Industries 2008. MTT Economic Research, Agrifood Research Finland, Publications 108a.
  31. Niemi, J. & Ahlstedt, J. (Eds.) (2010). Finnish Agriculture and Rural Industries 2010. MTT Economic Research, Agrifood Research Finland, Publications 110a.
  32. Niemi, R. & Häkkilä, M. (1988). Maatalouspolitiikasta ja maatalouden rakenteen alueellisista muutoksista Suomessa ja Ruotsissa 1950-luvulta 1980-luvulle: Oulu: Research Institute of Northern Finland, University of Oulu.
  33. O’Connor, D. & Dunne, W. (2009). Conceptualizing Multifunctionality in the Irish Policy Context – Issues for Policy Formulation, Implementation and Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 11(4), 333-346. Doi: 10.1080/15239080903033895. 10.1080/15239080903033895
  34. OECD (1994). Creating rural indicators for shaping territorial policy. Paris: OECD.
  35. OECD (2001). Multifunctionality. Towards an analytical framework. Paris: OECD. 10.1787/9789264192171-en
  36. OECD (2006a). Financing Agricultural Policies with Particular Reference to Public Good Provision and Multifunctionality: Which Level of Government? Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets. AGR/CA/APM(2005)19/FINAL.
  37. OECD (2006b). The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. Paris: OECD.
  38. OECD (2008a). OECD Rural Policy Reviews Finland. Paris: OECD.
  39. OECD (2008b). The role of farm households and the agro-food sector in the economy of rural areas: evidence and policy implications. Working party on agricultural policies and markets. TAD/CA/APM/WP(2008)25.
  40. OECD (2010). The OECD Regional Typology.Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development. 22 February 2010. Available on Internet: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/62/42392595.pdf. Accessed in 5.12.2011.
  41. Pearce, J. (2009). Regression, Linear and Nonlinear. In Kitchin, R. & Thrift, N., Eds., The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Methods, p. 302-308). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  42. van der Ploeg, J. D., van Broekhuizen, R., Brunori, G., Sonnino, R., Knickel, K, Tisenkopfs, T. & Oostindie, H. (2008). Towards a framework for understanding regional rural development. In van der Ploeg, J. D. and Marsden, T., Eds., Unfolding webs. The dynamics of regional rural development (pp. 1-28). Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.
  43. Pyykkönen, P. (2001). Maatalouden rakennemuutos eri alueilla.Pellervon taloudellisen tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisuja n:o 180 /Pellervo economic research institute Reports 180.
  44. Rosenqvist, O. (1997). Maatalouden alueellinen erikoistuminen Suomessa, Vaasan yliopiston julkaisuja, Tutkimuksia 219.
  45. Shucksmith, M., Thomson, K. J. & Roberts, D. (Eds.) (2005). The CAP and the regions: the territorial impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
  46. Statistics Finland a. Agricultural income and tax statistics. Non-public data.
  47. Statistics Finland b. Maa- ja metsätalousyritysten taloustilasto.Available on Internet: http://pxweb2.stat.fi/Database/StatFin/Maa/mmtal/mmtal_fi.asp. Accessed 16.12.2011.
  48. Statistics Finland c. Maaseutuindikaattorit. Available on Internet: http://www.stat.fi/tup/msind/index.html. Chargeable data. Accessed 16.12.2011.
  49. Tapio-Biström, M.-L., Vihinen, H. & Thessler, S. (2006). Maatalouden ja maaseudun kohtalonyhteys – tapaus Mäntyharju.Terra 118(3-4), 173-187.
  50. Terluin, I. (2001). Rural regions in the EU: exploring differences in economic development.Netherlands Geographical Studies289. Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijjkskundig Genootschap/Faculteit der Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
  51. Terluin, I. (2003). Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories. Journal of Rural Studies19(3), 327- 344. Doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2. 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2
  52. Terluin, I. & Venema, G. (2003). Towards regional differentiation of rural development policy in the EU. The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI).
  53. Tietz, A. & Grajewski, R. (2009). Rural Development Programmes 2007-2013: Differences in EU Member States’ Financial Allocations. EuroChoices, 8(1), 30-31.Doi: 10.1111/j.1746- 692X.2009.00119.x.
  54. Varjo, U. (1977). Finnish farming: typology and economics. Geography of world agriculture 6. Budapest: Research Institute of Geography, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  55. Varjo, U. (1980). On the location of agriculture in Finland. Oulu: Societas Geographica Fenniae Nordicae.
  56. Vihinen, H., Tapio-Biström, M.-L. & Voutilainen, O. (2005). Rural marginalisation and multifunctional land use in Finland. Working Papers 103. Helsinki: MTT Agrifood Research Finland.
  57. Voutilainen, O., Vihinen, H. & Wuori, O. (2009). Maatalous, maaseutu ja tukien kohdentuminen. Helsinki: MTT Agrifood Research Finland.
  58. Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post-productivism…and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 77-102. Doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00007. 10.1111/1475-5661.00007
  59. Wilson, G. A. (2009a). Post-Productivist and Multifunctional Agriculture. In Kitchin, R. & Thrift, N., Eds., The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Rural Geography, pp. 379-386). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00895-6
  60. Wilson G. A. (2009b). The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: A human geography perspective. Geoforum 40(2), 269-280. Doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00007.10.1111/1475-5661.00007
Language: English
Page range: 283 - 302
Published on: Oct 23, 2012
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2012 Olli Voutilainen, Olli Wuori, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 4 (2012): Issue 4 (October 2012)