Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Root causes of rural decline in economic well-being in Finland Cover

Root causes of rural decline in economic well-being in Finland

European Countryside
Volume 4 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jul 2012
References

References

  1. Andaluz, J., Lanaspa L. & Sanz, F. (2002). Geographical Dynamics: A Sectoral Comparison Between the Economic Landscapes of the United States and Europe., 36(4), 321-332. Doi: 10.1080/00343400220131106.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Anselin, L., Varga, A. & Arcs, Z. (1997). Local geographical spillovers between university research and high technology innovations., 42(3), 422-448. Doi: 10.1006/juec.1997.2032.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Castells, M. & Himanen, P. (2002).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Colecchia A. & Schreyer P. (2002). ICT Investment and Economic Growth in the 1990s: Is the United States a Unique Case? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Countries., 5(2), 408-442. Doi: 10.1006/redy.2002.0170.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Cooke, P. & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage., 31(1), 5-15. Doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5009-3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Cutrini, E. (2010). Specialization and Concentration from a Twofold Geographical Perspective: Evidence from Europe., 44(3), 315-336. Doi: 10.1080/00343400802378743.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Espon Project 2.1.3..
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Freudenburg, W. & Gramling, R. (1994). Natural resources and rural poverty: A closer look., 7(1), 5-22. Doi: 10.1080/08941929409380841.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Gallup, J., Sachs, J. & Mellinger, A. (1999). Geography and Economic Development., 22(2), 179-232. Doi: 10.1177/016001799761012334.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Gløersen, E., Dubois, A., Copus A. & Schürmann, C. (2005)., Nordregio Report 2005, 4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Heleniak, T. (2009). The role of attachment to place in migration decisions of the population of the Russian North,, 32(1), 31-60. Doi: 10.1080/10889370903000398.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Hill, F. & Gaddy, C. (2003).. Washington D.C: The Brookings Institution.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Jalava J. & Pohjola M. (2007). ICT as a source of output and productivity growth in Finland., 31(8-9), 463-472. Doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2007.05.011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Kainulainen, S., Rintala, T. & Heikkilä, M. (2001).. Tutkimuksia 114. Helsinki: STAKES.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kangasharju, A. & Pekkala, S. (2004). Increasing regional disparities in the 1990s: The Finnish experience., 38(3), 255-267. Doi: 10.1080/003434042000211097.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Karvonen, S. & Kauppinen, T. (2009). Kuinka Suomi jakautuu 2000-luvulla?, 74(5), 467-486.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Karvonen, S. & Rintala T. (2007). Maakuntien sisäiset hyvinvointierot., 72(4), 410-416.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography., 99(3), 483-499.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Leake, N., Adamowicz, W. & Boxall, P. (2006). An Econometric Analysis of the Effect of Forest Dependence on the Economic Well-being of Canadian Communities., 52(3), 595-604.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Lundholm, E 2007. New Motives for Migration? On Interregional Mobility in the Nordic Countries.2007:2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Machlis, G, Force, J. & Burch, W. (1990). Timber, minerals and social change: an explaratory test of two resource dependent communities., 55(3), 411-424. Doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1990.tb00691.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Malinen, P., Kytölä L., Keränen, H. & Keränen, R. (2006).Helsinki: Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Markey, S., Halseth, G. & Manson, D. (2006). The Struggle to Compete: From Comparative to competitive advantage in Northern British Columbia., 11(1), 19-39. Doi: 10.1080/13563470600935016.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Mekbeb, E., Lilieholm, R., Blahna, D. & Kruger, L. (2009). Resource use, dependence and vulnerability: community-resource linkages on Alaska's Tongass National Forest., 122, 263-272.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Moss, L. (2006). The Amenity Migrants: Ecological Challenge to Contemporary Shangri-La. In Moss, L. (Eds.),(pp. 3-26). Trowbridge, Cromwell Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Mukkala, K. (2004). Agglomeration Economies in the Finnish Manufacturing Sector., 36(21), 2419-2427. Doi: 10.1080/0003684042000287655.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Myyrä S. & Pietola K. (2005).Jokioinen: MTT.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Overdevest, C. & Green, G. (1995). Forest dependence and community well-being: A segmented market approach., 8(2), 111-131. Doi: 10.1080/08941929509380906.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Papyragis, E. and Gerlagh, R. (2007). Resource abundance and economic growth in the United States., 51(4), 1011-1039. Doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.04.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Parker, T., Kusimn, L., & Marre, A. (2010). Economic Recovery: lessons Learned from Previous Recessions., 8(3), 42-47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Partridge, M. (2010). The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth.89(3), 513-537. Doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00315.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Partridge, M., Bollman, R., Olfert, M. & Alasia, A. (2007). Riding the wave of urban growth in the countryside: Spread, backwash or stagnation?, 83(2), 128-152. Doi: 10.3368/le.83.2.128.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Partridge, M., Rickman D., Kamar A. & Olfert M. (2008). Lost in space: population growth in the American hinterlands and small cities., 8(6), 727-757. Doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn038.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Patriquin, M., Parkins, J. & Stedman, R. (2007). Socio-economic status of boreal communities in Canada. Forestry, 80(3), 279-291. Doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpm014.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Pehkonen, J. & Tervo H. (1998). Persistence and Turnover in Regional Unemployment Disparities., 32(5), 445-458. Doi: 10.1080/00343409850116844.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Polèse, M. & Shearmur, R. (2004). Is Distance Really Dead? Comparing Location Patterns over Time in Canada., 27(4), 431-457. Doi: 10.1177/0160017604267637.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Puga, D. (2002). European regional policies in light of recent location theories., 2(4), 373-406. Doi: 10.1093/jeg/2.4.373.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Pyykkönen, P. (2001).Helsinki: Pellervo Economic Research Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Rusanen, J., Muilu T., Colpaert, A. & Naukkarinen. A. (2001). Finnish socio-economic grid data, GIS and the hidden geography of unemployment., 22(2), 139-147. Doi: 10.1111/1467-9663.00146.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Sachs, J. & Warner, A. (1997a). Fundamental Sources of Long-Run Growth., 87(2), 184-188.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Sachs, J. & Warner, A. (1997b).Center for International Development and Harward Institute for International Development. Cambridge: Harward University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Siirilä S., Hautamäki L., Kuitunen J. & Keski-Petäjä T. (1990). Regional well-being variations in Finland., 168(2), 179-200.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Stedman, R., Parkins, J. & Beckley, T. (2004). Resource Dependence and Community Well-Being in Rural Canada., 69(2), 213-234. Doi: 10.1526/003601104323087589.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Stedman, R., Parkins, J. & Beckley, T. (2005). Forest dependence and community wellbeing in rural Canada: variation by forest sector and region., 35(1), 215-220. Doi: 10.1139/x04-140.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Suomi CD (2006). Data CD. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Terluin, I. and J. Post (2000) (eds).Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Tervo, H. (1998). The development of regional unemployment differentials in Finland in the 1990s., 11(1), 37-49.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Tervo, H. (2009). Centres and Peripheries in Finland: Granger Causality Tests Using Panel Data., 4(4), 377-390. Doi: 10.1080/17421770903317652.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Tuhkunen, A. (2007).. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, 1207.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Vaattovaara M. (1998).Helsinki: City of Helsinki Urban Facts Research Series.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Van de Ven, P., Kazemier B. & Keuning S. (1999).Voorburg/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, D., Lee, H., Wang, C., Li, B., Zhang J., Pei, Q. & Chen, J. (2011). Climate change and large-scale human population collapses in the pre-industrial era., 20(4), 520-531. Doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00625.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0025-4 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Czech, Latvian
Page range: 217 - 239
Published on: Jul 20, 2012
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Well-being,
rural development,
quantitative methods,
Finland
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2012 Olli Lehtonen, Markku Tykkyläinen, Olli Voutilainen, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 4 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)
Previous article