Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An integrated perspective on rural regional learning Cover

An integrated perspective on rural regional learning

European Countryside
Volume 4 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Feb 2012
References

References

  1. Asheim, B. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity.4(4), 379-400. DOI:10.1080/09654319608720354.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, B. (2007). Learning and innovation in a globalising economy: the role of learning regions. In Gustavsen, B., Nyhan, B. & Ennals, R.(pp. 218-234). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Asheim, B. T. & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters.34(8), 1173-1190. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Hübner, D., Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bruckmeier, K. & Tovey, H. (2008). Knowledge in sustainable rural development: from forms of knowledge to knowledge processes.48(3), 313-329. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00466.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Martínez Pellitero, M. & Baumert, T. (2006). Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case.26 (4), 463-472. Doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.007.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Cooke, P. (2007). Critique of the learning region concept and reevaluation of regional innovation systems. In: Gustavsen, B., Nyhan, B. & Ennals, R. (eds.),(pp. 198-217). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Crevoisier, O. & Jeannerat, H. (2009). Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus.17(8), 1223-1241. DOI: 10.1080/09654310902978231.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation.48(3), 274-291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Doloreux, D. (2002). What should we do about regional systems of innovation.24(3), 243-263. Doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Doloreux, D. (2003). Regional innovation systems in the periphery: the case of the Beace in Québec, Canada.7(1), 67-94. DOI: 10.1142/S1363919603000738.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Edquist, C. & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation. In Edquist, C., ed.,(pp. 41-63). London and Washington: Pinter/Cassell Academic.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Ellström, P.-E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: a learning perspective.22(1/2), 27-40. DOI 10.1108/13665621011012834.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Encyclopedia, B. O. (2011a). Public Administration
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Encyclopedia, B. O. (2011b). State.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.42(3), 293-337. DOI: 10.1177/05390184030423002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode-2’ to a triple helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.29(2), 109-123. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Fenwick, T. (2010). Understanding relations of individual collective learning in work: A review of research.39(2), 227-243. DOI: 10.1177/1350507608090875.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Florida, R. (1995). Towards the learning region.27(5), 527-536. DOI:10.1016/0016-3287(95)00021-N.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Franklin, A., Newton, J., Middleton, J. & Marsden, T. K. (2011). Reconnecting skills for sustainable communities with everyday life.43(2), 347-362. DOI:10.1068/a426.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Glasser, H. (2007). Minding the gap: the role of social learning in linking our stated desiure for a more sustainable world to our everyday actions and policies. In Wals, A. E. J., ed.,(pp. 35-61). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Gustavsen, B. & Ennals, R. (2007). Designing a European project on learning for local innovation. In Gustavsen, B., Nyhan, B. & Ennals, R., eds.,(pp. 16-34). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void.36(2), 175-195. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024834510939.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation.35(5), 715-728. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Huggins, R., Johnston, A. & Steffenson, R. (2008). Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy.1(2), 321-340. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsn013.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Jasanoff, S. & Martello, M. L. (2004). Conclusion: knowledge and governance. In Jasanoff, S. & Martello, M. L., eds.,(pp. 335-350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Moore, B. & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective Learning Processes, Networking and ‘~Institutional Thickness’ in the Cambridge Region.33(4), 319-332. DOI:10.1080/713693557.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Klerkx, L., Hall, A. & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer?8(5-6), 409-438. DOI: 10.1504/IJARGE.2009.032643.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Klerkx, L. & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector.76(6), 849-860. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Lawson, C. & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity.33(4), 305-317. DOI: 10.1080/713693555.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Leeuwis, C. (2004).Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Massey, D. (1991). A Global Sense of Place., 24-29. http://www.aughty.org/pdf/global_sense_place.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovations and regional renewal.31(5), 491-503. DOI: 10.1080/00343409750132289.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Nyhan, B. (2007). Building learning regions for innovation in Europe: a challenge for education and training. In Gustavsen, B., Nyhan, B. & Ennals, R., eds.,(pp. 16-34). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. OECD (2006a).OECD Publishing: 10.1787/9789264023918-en.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. OECD (2006b).OECD Publishing:
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Ploeg, J. D. v. d. & Marsden, T. K. (2008).Assen: Van Gorcum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous development in the EU. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. K. & Mooney, P. H., eds.,(pp. 278-291). London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Reimer, B. & Markey, S. (2008).
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Resch, J. (2006).Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft Wien. http://www.oieb.at/upload/2999_1_OIEB-Doku_Tagung_Lernende_Regionen.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Roep, D., Horlings, I. & Wielinga, E. (2009). De werkvloer van een Kennisnetwerk Vitaal Platteland. Kennis maken met regionale kennisarrangementen. LEI & UR, W. (2009-049), Den Haag: LEI Wageningen UR: http://www.lei.dlo.nl/publicaties/PDF/2009/2009-049.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Roep, D., Wellbrock, W., Kairyte, E., Farrell, M., Mahon, M., McDonagh, J., Frys, W., Nienaber, B., Kriszan, M., Nadler, R., Burdack, J. & Dominguez Garcia, L. (2011). DERREG D4.4 Summary Report., Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Rutten, R. & Boekema, F. (2007).Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Rutten, R. & Boekema, F. (2009). Universities and Regional Development.43(5), 771-775. DOI: 10.1080/00343400902986437.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences.24(4), 450-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Shucksmith, M. (2009). Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts.50(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Skuras, D., Meccheri, N., Moreira, M. B., Rosell, J. & Stathopoulou, S. (2005). Entrepreneurial human capital accumulation and the growth of rural businesses: a four-country survey in mountainous and lagging areas of the European Union.21(1), 67-80. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.05.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Stagl, S. (2006). Theoretical foundations of learning processes for sustainable development.14(1), 52-62. DOI: 10.1080/13504500709469707.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Stockdale, A. (2006). Migration: A Pre-Requisite for Rural Economic Regeneration.22(3), 354-366. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.11.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Storper, M. (1993). Regional "worlds" of production: learning and innovation in the technology distrcts of France, Italy and the USA.27(5), 433-455. DOI:10.1080/00343409312331347675.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Suvinen, N., Konttinen, J. & Nieminen, M. (2010). How Necessary are Intermediary Organizations in the Commercialization of Research?18(9), 1365-1389. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2010.492584.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Terluin, I. J. (2003). Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories.19(3), 327-344. DOI:10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Tomaney, J. (2010).Australian Business Association: Sydney, Australia. http://www.abfoundation.com.au/research_project_files/52/Tomaney_Rev.Final_Colour.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Tovey, H. (2008). Introduction: Rural Sustainable Development in the Knowledge Society Era.48(3), 185-199. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00460.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Wals, A. E. J. (2007).Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Wellbrock, W., Roep, D., Kairyte, E., Farrell, M., Mahon, M., McDonagh, J., Frys, W., Nienaber, B., Kriszan, M., Nadler, R., Burdack, J. & Dominguez Garcia, L. (2010). DERREG Deliverable 4.1 Overview of learning and innovation support strategies. Wellbrock, W. & Roep, D., Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands. www.derreg.eu.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Wellbrock, W., Roep, D., Kairyte, E., Farrell, M., Mahon, M., McDonagh, J., Frys, W., Nienaber, B., Kriszan, M., Nadler, R., Burdack, J. & Dominguez Garcia, L. (2011a). DERREG Deliverable 4.2 Support of joint learning and innovation in grassroots development initiatives: operational quality of arrangements. Wellbrock, W. & Roep, D., Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands. www.derreg.eu.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Wellbrock, W., Roep, D., Kairyte, E., Farrell, M., Mahon, M., McDonagh, J., Frys, W., Nienaber, B., Kriszan, M., Nadler, R., Burdack, J. & Dominguez Garcia, L. (2011b). DERREG Deliverable 4.3: Summary of good practise examples: Well-working arrangements for support of joint learning and innovation in Europe's rural regions. Wellbrock, W. & Roep, D., Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands. www.derreg.eu.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Wielinga, E., Roep, D. & Geerling-Eiff, F. A. (2009). New regional knowledge arrangements facilitating regional learning., Vaasa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2007).[Inagural lecture] Wageningen University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Wolfe, D. A. & Gertler, M. S. (2002). Innovation and Social Learning: An Introduction. In Gertler, M. S. & Wolfe, D. A., eds.,(pp. 1-24). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Woods, M. (2007). Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place.31(4), 485-507. DOI: 10.1177/0309132507079503.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. Woods, M. (2009). Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Synthesis and Contextualisation of Research and Development of an Interpretative Model. Woods, M., Aberystwyth University: Aberystwyth, UK. www.derreg.eu.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0010-y | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Dutch, German, Spanish
Page range: 1 - 16
Published on: Feb 24, 2012
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
rural regional learning,
place-based development,
supportive policies,
joint learning and innovation,
public-private arrangements,
capacity building,
regional reflexivity
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2012 Wiebke Wellbrock, Dirk Roep, Johannes Wiskerke, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 4 (2012): Issue 1 (March 2012)
Next article