Have a personal or library account? Click to login
New ideas for old landscapes: using a social-ecological approach for conservation of traditional rural biotopes - a case study from Finland Cover

New ideas for old landscapes: using a social-ecological approach for conservation of traditional rural biotopes - a case study from Finland

European Countryside
Volume 3 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)
By: Traci Birge and  Marianne Fred  
Open Access
|Oct 2011

References

  1. Ahlenius, H. (2001). UNEP/GRID-Arendal, Baltic Sea drainage basin, UNEP/GRID-Arendal Maps and Graphics Libraryhttp://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/baltic_sea_drainage_basin
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Allen, C., Fontaine, J., Pope, K. & Garmestani, A. (2011). Adaptive management for a turbulent future. Journal of Environmental Management 92(5), 1339-1345. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.01910.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.01921168260
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, E., Baldock, D., Bennett, H., Beaufoy, G., Bignal, E., Brouwer, F., Elbersen, B., Eiden, G., Godeschalk, F., Jones, G., McCracken, D., Nieuwenhuizen, W., van Eupen, M., Hennekens, S., & Zervas, G. (2003). Developing a High Nature Value Farming Area Indicator.___Internal Report for the European Environment Agency. IEEP, 2007. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-area-under-management-practices/developing-a-high-nature-value (accessed 19/3/2011) http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/agriculture-area-under-management-practices/developing-a-high-nature-value
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Beaufoy, G. & Cooper, T. (2009). Guidance Document: the Application of the High Nature Value Indicator 2007-2013. European Communities http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/hnv/guidance_en.pd.f. (accessed 30/1/2011) http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/hnv/guidance_en.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Benstead, P.J., Jose, P.V., Joyce, C.B., Wade, P.M. & (1999). European Wet Grassland: Guidelines for Management and Restoration. RSPB, Sandy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Folk, C. (2008). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods: 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 3rd edition. Mcgraw Hill Open University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. EEA (2004). High Nature Value Farmland: Characteristics, Trends and Policy Challenges. EEA Report 1/2004 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/report_2004_1
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. EEA (2010). 10 Messages for 2010: Cultural Landscapes and Biodiversity Heritage. European Environment Agency, Denmark. Doi: 10.2800/5664 http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/10-messages-for-2010-2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Ekenäs Stad (Tammisaari/Ekenäs Municipality, now Raasepori Municipality), 2006. Skärlandet Landskapsvårdsomrade: Skötsel- och Användningsplan/Skärlandet Maisema-Alue: Hoito- ja Käyttösuunnitelma (Skärlandet Landscape Conservation Area: Management and Use plan). (In Swedish and Finnish, summary in English).
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Gregory, R., Ohlson, D. & Arvai, J. (2006). Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. Ecological Applications 16, 2411-2425. Doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2411:DAMCFA]2.0.CO;2
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. (2010). Chapter 6: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Raffaelli, D.G. and C.L.J. Frid (Eds.), Ecosystem Ecology: A Synthesis (pp. 110-139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Heliölä J., Lehtomäki, J., Kuussaari, M., Tiainen, J., Piha, M., Lehtonen, H., Miettinen, A. & Koikkalainen, K., 2009. Luonnoltaan Arvokkaat Maatalousalueet Suomessa- Määrittely, Seuranta ja Hoidon Taloudelliset Edellytykset. MMM 1/2009. Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy. http://www.mmm.fi/attachments/mmm/julkaisut/julkaisusarja/2009/5HZiK6×4l/MMMjulkaisu2009_1.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kröger, L. (2005), Development of the Finnish agri-environmental policy as a learning process. European Environment 15, 13-26. Doi: 10.1002/eet.37010.1002/eet.370
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Marini, L., Klimek, S. & Battisti, A. (2011). Mitigating the impacts of the decline of traditional farming on mountain landscapes and biodiversity: a case study in the European Alps. Environmental Science & Policy 14(3), 258-267. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.00310.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Metsähallitus (2011). http://www.metsa.fi/sivustot/metsa/fi/Luonnonsuojelu/Yhteistyo/Tutkimusyhteistyo/Sivut/Ennallistamisenjaluonnonhoidonasiantuntijayhteistyo.aspx
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A Framework for Assessment._Washington D.C: Island Press http://www.maweb.org/en/Framework.aspx
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Newcome, J., Provins, A., Johns, H., Ozdemiroglu, E. & Ghazoul, J. (2005). Economic, Social and Ecological Value of Ecosystem Services: Literature Review. Final Report for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). London: Economics for Environment Consultancy (EFTEC).
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Pullin, A.S., & Knight, T.M. (2003). Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. Journal for Nature Conservation 11(2), 83-90. Doi: 1381/03/11/02-08310.1078/1617-1381-00040
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Pullin, A.S., Báldi, A., Can, O.E., Dieterich, M., Kati, V., Livoreil, B., Lövei, G., Mihok, B., Nevin, O., Selva, N. & Sousa-Pinto, I. (2009). Conservation focus on Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conservation Biology 23(4), 818-824. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01283.x10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01283.x19627313
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Pitkänen, M. & Tiainen, J. (2001). Biodiversity of Agricultural Landscapes in Finland. Birdlife Finland Conservation Series no 3. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Pykälä, J. & Bonn, T. (2000). Traditional Rural Biotopes in the Province of Uusimaa. Regional Environmental Publications 178. Finnish Environment Institute, Uusimaa Regional Environment Centre. Edita Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Pykälä, J. (2000). Mitigating human effects on European biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Conservation Biology. 14(3), 705-712. Doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99119.x.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99119.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Raunio, A., Schulman, A. & Kontula, T. (Eds.), 2008. Assessment of Threatened Habitat Types in Finland-Parts 1 & 2. The Finnish Environment 8/2008. Finnish Environment Institute. Vammala Kirjapaino OY, Vammala. English summary: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=86834&lan=en. http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=86834&lan=en
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D. & Bennett, E.M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analysing trade-offs in diverse landscapes. PNAS 107(11), 5242-5247. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.090728410710.1073/pnas.0907284107284195020194739
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Salminen, P. & Kekäläinen, H. (Eds.), 2000. Perinnebiotooppien Hoito Suomessa. Perinnemaisemien Hoitotyöryhmän Mietintö. Finnish Environment Institute 443. Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Schultz, L., Folke, C. & Olsson, P. (2007). Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34(2), 140-152. DOI:10.1017/S0376892907003876.10.1017/S0376892907003876
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Siebert, R., Toogood, M. & Knierim, A. (2006). Factors affecting European farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 318-340. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Sutherland, W.J., Pullin, A.S., Dolman, P.M. & Knight, T.M. (2004). The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 19(6), 305-308. Doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.01810.1016/j.tree.2004.03.01816701275
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. SYSTAT 12, 2007. Copyright © 2007 by SYSTAT Software, Inc. SYSTAT Software, Inc. Chicago, IL.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Tike Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland, 2011. Matilda Agricultural Statistics. http://www.maataloustilastot.fi/maatilojen-rakenne
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Vainio, M., Kekäläinen, H., Alanen, A. & Pykälä, J. (2001). Finnish Traditional Rural Biotopes: Final Report of the National Traditional Rural Biotope Project (Finnish only). Finnish Environment no. 527. Finnish Environment Institute. Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy, Vammala. http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?contentid=49914&lan=fi http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?contentid=49914&lan=fi
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-011-0008-x | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 67
Published on: Oct 19, 2011
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
traditional rural biotopes,
cultural landscapes,
social-ecological inventory,
adaptive management,
High Nature Value farmland,
Finland,
semi-natural meadows,
agri-environmental scheme (AES)
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2011 Traci Birge, Marianne Fred, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)