Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Land use dynamics in the dehesas in the Sierra Morena (Spain): the role of diverse management strategies to cope with the drivers of change Cover

Land use dynamics in the dehesas in the Sierra Morena (Spain): the role of diverse management strategies to cope with the drivers of change

European Countryside
Volume 3 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)
By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2011
References

References

  1. Acosta Naranjo, R. (2005): Medio ambiente, grupos sociales y conocimiento local en la dehesa. Un caso de estudio en la Sierra Morena extremeña.206, 63-85.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Aguilar Criado, E. (2007). Productos locales, mercados globales: nuevas dinámicas en el medio rural. In. García Docampo, M. (ed.),(pp. 145-169). La Coruña: Netbiblo.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Beaufoy, G. (1995). Distribution of extensive farming systems in Spain. In. McCracken, D. I.; Bignal, E. & Wenlock, S. E. (eds.).. Proceedings of the Fourth European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism. (pp. 46-49). Petersborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F, Colding, J. & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management.10(5), 1251-1262. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Blaikie. P. & Brookfield, H. C. (eds.) (1987).. London: Methuen & Co.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Blondel, J. (2006). The ‘design’ of Mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story of humans and ecological systems during the historic period.34, 713-729. DOI 10.1007/s10745-006-9030-4
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Bryant, R. L. & Bailey, S. (1997).. London: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Caraveli, H. (2000). A comparative analysis on intensification and extensification in Mediterranean agriculture: dilemmas for LFAs policy.16(2), 231-242. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00050-9
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Ceresuela, J. L. (1998). De la dehesa al bosque mediterráneo. In. Hernández Díaz-Ambrona, C. G. (ed.),(pp. 45-51). Madrid: Editorial Agrícola Española.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Crumley, C. L. (2007): Historical Ecology: Integrated Thinking at Multiple Temporal and Spatial Scales. In: Hornborg, A. & Crumley, C.L. (eds.):(pp. 15-28). Walnut Creek CA: Left Coast Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Díaz, M., Campos Palacín, P. & Pulido, F. J. (1997). The Spanish dehesas: a diversity in land-use and wildlife. In. Pain, D. J. & Pienkowsky, M. W. (eds.),(pp. 178-209) London: Academic Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Escobar, A. (1999): After nature: steps to an anti-essentialist political ecology., 40(1), 1-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Euronatur, Fundación Mediterráneo & WWF (2006).. Retrieved March 5, 2011 from
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. European Council (2006). 2006/144/EC:(programming period 2007 to 2013). Official Journal L 055, 25/02/2006 pp. 0020-0029.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Fabricius, C., Folke, C., Cundill, G. & Schultz, L. (2007). Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management.12(1). 29. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29/
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Fernández Ales, R. (1997). La dehesa. In. Jurado Doña, V. (Ed.),. Tomo 7. El medio forestal (pp. 53-72). Sevilla: Ed. Giralda
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Fernández Ales, R., Martín, A., Ortega, F. & Ales, E. E. (1992). Recent changes in landscape structure and function in a Mediterranean region of SW Spain (1950-1984).7(1), 3-18. DOI: 10.1007/BF02573953
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Fisher, C. T. & Feinman, G. M. (2005). Introduction to "Landscapes over Time".107(1), 62-69. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2005.107.1.062
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. García del Barrio, J. M, Bolaños, F., Ortega, M. & Elena-Roselló, R. (2004). Dynamics of land use and land cover change in dehesa landscapes of the "REDPARES" network between 1956 and 1998. In. Schnabel, S. & Ferreira, A. (eds.),. Advances in Geoecology 37 (pp. 47-54). Reiskirchen: Catena.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gastó Coderch, J., Calzado Martínez, C., Carbonero Muñoz, M. D., De Pedro Sanz, E., Fernández Rebollo, P., Garrido Varo, A., Gómez Cabrera, A., Guerrero Ginel, J. E., Guzmán Álvarez, R., Lara Vélez, P. & Ortiz Medina, L. (2008).. Retrieved March 5, 2011 from
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Geist, H. (1999): Exploring the entry points for Political Ecology in the international research agenda on Global Environmental Change.43 (3-4), 158-168.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Graner, E. (1997).. Freiburger Studien zur Geographischen Entwicklungsforschung 14. Saarbrücken: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Hersperger, A. M., Gennaio M., Verburg, P. H., & Bürgi, M. (2010). Linking land change with driving forces and actors: four conceptual models.15(4), 1. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art1/
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Holling, C. S., Gunderson, L. H. & D. Ludwig (2002): In Quest of a Theory of Adaptive Change. - In: Gunderson, L. H. & C.S. Holling (eds.):(3-22). Washington: Island Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Joffre, R., Vacher, J., de los Llanos, C. & Gilbert Long (1988). The dehesa: an agrosilvopastoral system of the Mediterranean region with special reference to the Sierra Morena area of Spain.6(1-3), 71-96. DOI: 10.1007/BF02344747
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Kadoyaa, T. & Washitanib, I. (2011). The Satoyama Index: A biodiversity indicator for agricultural landscapes.140, 20-26. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.007
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Krings, T. (2000). Das politisch-ökologische Analysekonzept in der Umweltforschung. Beispiel der städtischen Brennstoffversorgung in Dakar (Senegal).52(11), 56-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Lambin, E. F. & Geist, H. (2001). Global land-use and land-cover change: what have we learned so far?46, 27-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Lohnert, B. & Geist, H. (1999). Endangered ecosystems and coping strategies. Towards a conceptualization of environmental change in the developing world. In. Lohnert, B. & Geist, H. (eds.),. (pp. 1-53) Aldershot: Ashgate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Marañon, T., Zamora, R. Villar, R., Zavala, M. A., Quero, J. L., Pérez-Ramos, I., Mendoza, I. & Castro, J. (2004): Regeneration of tree species and restoration under constrasted Mediterranean habitats: field and glasshouse experiments.30(3), 187-196.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. McNeill, J., Alves, D., Arizpe, L., Bykova, O., Galvin, K., Kelmelis, J., Migot-Adholla, S., Morisette, P., Moss, R., Richards, J., Riebsame, W., Sadowski, F., Sanderson, S., Skole, D., Tarr, J., Williams, M. Yadav, S. & Young, S. (1994). Toward a typology and regionalization of land-cover and land-use change: report of Working Group B. In. Meyer, W. B. & Turner, B. L. II. (eds.),. Global Change Institute 4 (pp. 55-72). Cambridge: University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Moreira Madueño, J. M. & González Fernández, A. (1997).. Sevilla: Consejería de Medio Ambiente.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Mulero Mendigorri, A. (2001). Los espacios naturales protegidos en Andalucía: evolución, caracterización geográfica y singularidades.54-55, 141-157. http://www.revistaeria.es/index.php/eria/article/view/514.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Newman, L. & Dale, A. (2005): Network Structure, Diversity, and Proactive Resilience Building: a Response to Tompkins and Adger.10(1): r2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp2/
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Ojeda Rivera, J. F. (1989). El bosque andaluz y su gestión a través de la historia. In. Cano García, G. (eds.),(pp.315-355). Sevilla: Tartessos.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Ojeda Rivera, J. F. & Silva Pérez, R. (1997). Dehesas de Sierra Morena y políticas agroambientales comunitarias.57 (227), 203-226.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Ojeda Rivera, J. F. & Silva Pérez, R. (2002). Efectos de la implantación del modelo agroambiental y postproductivista en la Sierra Morena onubense.63(246), 69-100. DOI: 10.3989/egeogr.2002.i246.261
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Olea, L. & San Miguel-Ayanz, A. (2006): The Spanish dehesa. A traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system linking production and nature conservation. In: Lloveras, J., A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, O. Vazquez-Yañez, J. Piñeiro, O. Santamaria, L. Olea, & Poblaciones, M. J. (eds.):(pp. 3-13). Badajoz: Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Oudenhoven, F. J. W. van, Mijatovi, D. & Eyzaguirre, P. B. (2010). Bridging managed and natural landscapes. The role of traditional (agri)culture in maintaining the diversity and resilience of social-ecological systems. In. Bélair, C., Ichikawa, K., Wong, B. Y. L. & Mulongoy, K. J. (eds.),. Technical Series 52 (pp. 8-21). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Papanastasis, V. P. (2004). Vegetation degradation and land use changes in agrosilvopastoral systems. In. Schnabel, S. & Ferreira, A. (eds.),. Advances in Geoecology 37 (pp. 1-12). Reiskirchen: Catena Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Parejo Delgado, C. (1995).. Málaga: Agora.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Parsons, J. J. (1962). The acorn-hog economy of the oak woodlands of southwestern Spain.52 (2), 211-235. [online] URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/212957
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Peco, B., Oñate, J. J. & Requena, S. (2001): Dehesa grasslands: natural values, threats and agri-environmental measures in Spain. En:(pp. 37-43). Ennistymon: EFNCP.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Pérez Soba, M., San Miguel A., & Elena-Rosselló, R. (2007). Complexity in the simplicity: The Spanish Dehesas. In. Pedroli, B., van Doorn, A., de Blust, G., Paracchini, M. L., Wascher, D. & Bunce, F. (eds.),(pp. 369-384). Zeist: KNNV.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Pinto Correia, T. & Mascarenhas, J. (1999). Contribution to the extensification / intensification debate: new trends in the Portuguese montado.46, 125-131. DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00036-5
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Plieninger, T. (2006).. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Plieninger, T. & Hall-Beyer, M. (2007): Traditional land-use and nature conservation in rural Europe. In: Cleveland, C.J. (ed.):. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Plieninger, T., Höchtl, F. & Spek, T. (2006): Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes.9, 317-321. Doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.03.001
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Plieninger, T., Modollel y Mainou, J. & Konold, W. (2004). Land manager attitudes towards management, regeneration, and conservation of Spanish holm oak savannas (dehesas).66, 185-198. DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00100-2
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Plieninger, T. & Wildbrand, C. (1999). Die Dehesas in Spanien. - In. Konold, W.; Böcker, R. & Hampicke, U. (eds.),(pp. 1-13). Landsberg: Wiley-VCH.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Pretty, J. & Ward, H. (2003): Social Capital and the Environment.29 (2), pp. 209-227.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Rivera Mateos, M. (1992).. Estudios de Geografía 5. Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. San Miguel Ayanz, A. (1994).. Madrid: Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Schröder, C. (2005).. Sevilla: Consejería de Medio Ambiente.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Silva Pérez, R. (1995): Las acciones forestales en el seno de la PAC. Consecuencias para Andalucía del programa de reforestación.21, 85-104.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Sundseth, K. (2009).Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Swanborn, P. G. (2010).London: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Turner, B. L. II. & Robbins, P. (2008). Land-Change Science and Political Ecology: Similarities, Differences, and Implications for Sustainability Science.33, 295-316. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.022207.104943
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Turner, B. L. II.; Skole, D. L.; Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L. & Leemans, R. (1995).IGBP Report 35 & IHDP Report 7. Geneva: HDP Secretariat.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Vacher, J., Joffre, R., Ortega, F., Fernandez Ales, R. & Martin Vicente, A. (1985). L'organisation de l'espace dans la Sierra Norte de Séville (Sierra Morena) et les problème actuels des dehesas.56(2), 179-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Vos, W. & Meekes, H. (1999). Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future.46: 3-14. DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Zavala, M. A. de, Zamora, R., Pulido, F., Blanco, J. A., Bosco Imbert, J., Marañón, T., Castillo, F. J., & Valladares, F. (2004). Nuevas perspectivas en la conservación, restauración y gestión sostenible del bosque mediterráneo. In. Valladares, F. (ed.),(pp. 509-529). Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, EGRAF, S. A.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-011-0006-z | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, German, Spanish, Swedish
Page range: 11 - 28
Published on: Oct 19, 2011
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Dehesa,
Land change,
Political Ecology,
Land-Use Change,
Resilience,
Social-ecological systems,
Adaptive management strategies
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2011 Christoph Schröder, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)
Previous article
Next article