Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Agriculture and landscape in the 21st century Europe: the post-communist transition Cover

Agriculture and landscape in the 21st century Europe: the post-communist transition

European Countryside
Volume 2 (2010): Issue 1 (March 2010)
By: Mark Blacksell  
Open Access
|Sep 2010

References

  1. Andersen, E., A. Rutherford & M. Winter (2000). The beef regime. In: Brouwer, F. & P. Lowe (eds.) CAP Regimes and the European Countryside. Prospects for Integration between Agricultural, Regional and Environmental Policies (pp. 55-70), Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Blacksell, M. (2006). Political Geography. London: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Blacksell, M. & K. M. Born (2002a). Private property restitution: the geographical consequences of official government policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Geographical Journal 168:178-190.10.1111/1475-4959.00046
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Blacksell, M. & K. M. Born (2002b). Rural property restitution in Germany's New Bundesländer: the case of Bergholz. Journal of Rural Studies 18(3), 325-338. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00009-810.1016/S0743-0167(02)00009-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Cobb, D., P. Dolman & T. O'Riordan (1999). Interpretations of sustainable agriculture in the UK. Progress in Human Geography 23(2), 209-3510.1177/030913259902300204
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (1998). Agenda 2000: commission proposals. COM (98) 158 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Commission of the European Communities (2002). Enlargement and agriculture: successfully integrating the new Member States into the CAP. SEC (2002) 95 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities (2004). Proposal for a council regulation on support to rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. An extended impact assessment. COM (2004) 490 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Council of the European Communities (1999). Support for rural development from the European Agricultural and Guidance Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain regulations. Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Council of the European Communities (2005). Support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Crescenzi, R. (2004). EU agricultural policy and the regional differentiation of agriculture in Poland. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Regional Studies Association on Europe at the Margins: EU Regional Policy, Peripherality and Rurality. France: Angers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Department for Rural Affairs (2003). The mid-term evaluation of the Leader+ programme. ADAS Consulting Limited & SQW Limited. London: Department for Rural Affairs.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Firbank, L. G. (2005). Striking a new balance between agricultural production and biodiversity. Annals of Applied Biology 146: 163-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Getimis, P. (2003). Improving the European Union regional policy by learning from the past in view of enlargement. European Planning Studies 11(1), 77-87. DOI: 10.1080/0965431030366210.1080/09654310303662
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Gray, J. (2000). The common agricultural policy and the reinvention of the rural in the European community. Sociologia Ruralis 40(1), 30-52.10.1111/1467-9523.00130
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Holloway, L., R. Cox, L. Venn, M. Kneafsey, L. Dowler & H. Tuomainen (2006). Managing sustainable farmed landscapes through ‘alternative’ food networks: a case study from Italy. Geographical Journal 176(3), 219-229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2006.00205.x10.1111/j.1475-4959.2006.00205.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Jongman, R. H. G. (2002). Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape and Urban Planning 58(2-4), 211-221. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00222-510.1016/S0169-2046(01)00222-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Judt, T. (2005). Postwar. A history of Europe since 1945. London: William Heinemann.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kelch, D. (1999). EU's Agenda 2000 and beyond. US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Outlook.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kostov, P. & J. Lingard (2002). Subsistence farming in transitional economies: lessons from Bulgaria. Journal of Rural Studies 18(1), 83-94. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00026-210.1016/S0743-0167(01)00026-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Lerman, Z., C. Csaki & G. Feder (2004). Agriculture in transition: land policies and evolving farm structures in post-soviet countries. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Lloyd, G., J. McCarthy & B. Illsley (2004). Commercial and industrial developments in national parks in England and Wales: lessons for the Scottish agenda. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 6(3-4) 289-304. DOI: 10.1080/152390804200034407810.1080/1523908042000344078
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Lowe, P., H. Buller & N. Ward (2002). Setting the next agenda? British and French approaches to the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy. Journal of Rural Studies 181) 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00025-010.1016/S0743-0167(01)00025-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Lowe, P. & N. Ward (1998). Regional policy, CAP reform and rural development in Britain: the challenge for New Labour. Regional Studies 32, 469-474.10.1080/00343409850116862
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Mander, Ü. & R. H. G. Jongman (1998). Human impact on rural landscapes in Central and Northern Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 41, 149-153.10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00067-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Marsden, T. (1995). Beyond agriculture? Regulating the new rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 11, 285-296.10.1016/0743-0167(95)00027-K
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. McCarthy, J., G. Lloyd & B. Illsley (2002). National parks in Scotland: balancing environment and economy. European Planning Studies 10(5), 665-670. DOI: 10.1080/0965431022014538710.1080/09654310220145387
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Palang, H., Ü. Mander & A. Luud (1998). Landscape diversity changes in Estonia. Landscape and Urban Planning 41(3-4, 163-169. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00055-310.1016/S0169-2046(98)00055-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Palang, H., H. Alumäe & Ü. Mander (2000). Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 50(1-3), 85-94. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00081-510.1016/S0169-2046(00)00081-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Pedroli, B. (2004). Die europäische Landschaft, was tun wir mit ihr? Natur 2, 2-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Ray, C. (2002). A mode of production for fragile rural economies: the territorial accumulation of forms of capital. Journal of Rural Studies 18, 225-231.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00003-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Rizov, M. (2006). Rural development perspectives in enlarging Europe: the implications of CAP reforms and agricultural transition in accession countries. European Planning Studies 14, 219-238.10.1080/09654310500418101
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Semm, K. & H. Palang (2004). Lifeways in the Setu cultural landscape. Pro Ethnologia 18: Culture and Environments, pp. 49-67.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Swinbank, A. (1999). CAP reform and the WTO: compatibility and developments. European Review of Agricultural Economics 26, 389-407.10.1093/erae/26.3.389
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Swinbank, A. (2005). Developments in the Doha Round and WTO dispute settlement: some implications for EU agricultural policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(4), 551-561. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbi03010.1093/erae/jbi030
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, A. R. (2005). Agriculture in future rural landscapes: opportunities through innovative research in applied biology. Annals of Applied Biology 146(2), 135-136.10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.050036.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2007). http://www.unep-wcmc.org/forest/data/cdrom2/eutabs.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Vos, W. & H. Meekes (1999). Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning 46(1-3), 3-14. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-210.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Wascher, D. & M. Perez-Soba (eds.) (2004). Learning from European Traditional Landscapes-A Project in Support of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Europe Report 964. Wageningen: University of Wageningen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Wichern, R. (2004). Economics of the Common Agricultural Policy. European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs: Economic Papers 211. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-010-0002-8 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 24
Published on: Sep 27, 2010
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Agriculture,
European Union (EU),
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP),
landscape change,
post-communist transition
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2010 Mark Blacksell, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 2 (2010): Issue 1 (March 2010)