Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The interface between Marx and Brussels. Editorial Cover

The interface between Marx and Brussels. Editorial

European Countryside
Volume 2 (2010): Issue 1 (March 2010)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2010
References

References

  1. Abrahams, R. (1994). The regeneration of family farming in Estonia.34 (4), 354-368.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Alumäe, H., Printsmann, A. & Palang, H. (2003). Cultural and historical values in landscape planning: locals' perception. In: Palang, H. & Fry, G. (eds.)(pp. 125-145). Series: Décamps, H., B. Tress & G. Tess (eds.)Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers,.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Alumäe, H., Külvik, M. Palang H.: Futures revisited: using scenarios in illustrating landscape changes,(in print)
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Antrop, M. (1997). The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of Flanders Region.38 (1-2), 105-117.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Antrop, M. (1998). Landscape change: plan or chaos?41 (3-4), 155-161.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Antrop, M. (2000). Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis.77 (1-2), 17-28.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe.67 (1-4), 9-26.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future.70 (1-2), 21-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Blacksell, M. & Born, K. M. (2002a). Private property restitution: the geographical consequences of official government policies in Central and Eastern Europe.168,178-190.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Blacksell, M. & Born, K. M. (2002b). Rural property restitution in Germany's New Bundesländer: the case of Bergholz.18, 325-338.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Blacksell, M. & Williams, A. M. (1994).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Born, K. M. (2004). The dynamics of property rights in post-communist East Germany. In: Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Antrop, M. & Setten, G. (eds.)(pp. 315-332). Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers,.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, L. (1871).London: Macmillan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Clout, H., Blacksell, M., King, R. & Pinder, D. (1985).London: Longman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Cosgrove, D. E. (1984).Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Cosgrove, D. E. (2003). Landscape: ecology and semiosis. In: Palang, H. & Fry, G. (eds.)(pp. 15-21). Series: Décamps, H., Tress, B. & Tess, G. (eds.)I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Djelic, M. L. & Quack, S. (2007). Overcoming path dependency: path generation in open systems.36 (2), 161-186.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Galbreath, D. J. (ed.) (2009). Special issue From Phosphate Springs to Nord Stream: Contemporary Environmentalism in the Baltic States.40 (3).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Garcia-Ramon, M.-D. (2003). Globalization and international geography: the questions of languages and scholarly traditions.27 (1), 1-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Gray, J. (2000). The common agricultural policy and the reinvention of the rural in the European community.40(1), 30-52. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00130
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Gregory, D. (2001). Cultures of travel and spatial formations of knowledge.54 (4), 297-319.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, D. (2009). Regional geography. In: Gregory, D., R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. J. Watts and S. Whatmore (eds.), 5ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map.26 (2), 1-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Hedin, S. (2005). Land restitution in the former Swedish settlement areas in Estonia consequences for land ownership, land use and landscape.70 (1-2): 35-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Helmfrid, S. (2004). The permanent conference and the study of the rural landscape. In: Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Antrop, M. & Setten, G. (eds.)(pp. 467-482). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Herslund, L. (2007). Rural diversification in the Baltic countryside: a local perspective.70, 47-59.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Hinrikus, R. & Kõresaar, E. (2004). A brief overview of life history collection and research in Estonia. In: Kirss, T., Kõresaar, E. & Lauristin, M. (eds.)(pp. 19-34). Tartu: Tartu University Press
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Hägerstrand, T. (1975). Space, time and human conditions. In: Karlqvist, A., Lundquist, L. & Snickars, F. (eds.)Lexington: Saxon House Lexington Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Johnston, R. J. (1978). Paradigms and revolution or evolution? Observations on human geography since the Second World War.2, 189-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Jones, M. (1991). The elusive reality of landscape: concepts and approaches in landscape research.45 (4), 229-244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Jones, M. (1993). Landscape as a resource and the problem of landscape values. In: Rusten, C. & Woien, H. (eds.)(pp. 19-33)). Proceedings from a workshop in Trondheim March 26, 1993. Trondheim: University of Trondheim.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Jones, M. (2003). The concept of cultural landscape: discourse and narratives. In: Palang, H. & Fry, G. (eds.)Series: Décamps, H., Tress, B. & Tess, G. (eds.)(pp. 21-51). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers,.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Maandi, P. (2009). The silent articulation of private land rights in Soviet Estonia: a geographical perspective.40, 454-464.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Mander, Ü. & Palang, H. (1994). Changes of landscape structure in Estonia during the Soviet period.33 (1), 45-54.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Olwig, K. R. 1996: Recovering the substantive nature of landscape.86 (4), 630-653.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Olwig, K. R. (2002).Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Palang, H. & Fry, G. (2003). Landscape interfaces. In: Palang, H. & Fry, G. (eds.)(pp. 1-13). Series: Décamps, H., Tress, B. & Tess, G. (eds.)Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Palang, H., Helmfrid, S., Antrop, M., & Alumäe, H. (2005). Rural landscapes: past processes and future strategies.70 (1-2), 3-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Palang, H., Kaur, E., Alumäe, H. & Jürimäe, K. (1999). Conflicts between landscape values as driving force for landscape management.53 (2), 153-159.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Palang, H., Mander, Ü. & Luud, A. (1998). Landscape diversity dynamics in Estonia.41, 163-169.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Palang, H. & Printsmann, A. (2010). From totalitarian to democratic landscapes: the transition in Estonia. In: Primdahl, J. & Swaffield, S. (eds.)(pp. 169-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Konkoly Gyuró, É., Urbanc, M., Skowronek, E. & Woloszyn, W. (2006). The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe.21 (3), 347-357.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Peterson, U. & Aunap, R. (1998). Changes in agricultural land use in Estonia in the 1990s detected with multitemporal Landsat MSS imagery.41, 193-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Pred, A. (1977). The choreography of existence: comments on Hägerstrand's time-geography and its usefulness.53 (2), 207-221.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Printsmann, A., Kõivupuu, M. & Palang, H. (2010). The dual character of landscape in the Lahemaa national park, Estonia. In: Roca, Z., Claval P. & Agnew J. (eds.)Farnham: Ashgate Publishing,
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Rausing, S. (2004).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Roberts, N. et al. (2009). Obituary. Professor Mark Blacksell.174 (2), 179-181.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Roe, M. (ed.) (2007). Special issue Regional Perspective: Transitional Landscapes in Eastern Asia.32 (2), 111 -115
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Said, E. (1978).New York: Pantheon.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Sauer, C. O. (1925). The morphology of landscape.2 (2), 19-54.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Schwartz, H. (2004). Down the wrong path: path dependence, increasing returns, and historical institutionalism. Unpublished manuscript
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Sewell, W. H. (1996a). Historical events as transformations of structures: inventing revolution at the Bastille.25 (6), 841-881.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Sewell, W. H. (1996b). Three temporalities: toward an eventful sociology. In: McDonald, T. J. (ed.)(pp. 245-280). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Sheppard, E. & Nagar, R. (2004). From East-West to North-South.36 (4), 557-563. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00433.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Skowronek, E., Krukowska, R., Swieca, A. & Tucki, A. (2005). The evolution of rural landscapes in mid-eastern Poland as exemplified by selected villages.70, 45-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Skowronek, E., Woloszyn, W., Spek T. & Born, K. M. (eds.) (2006).Lublin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Smurr, R. W. (2008). Lahemaa: the paradox of the USSR's first national park.36 (3), 399-423.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Unwin, T. (1997). Agricultural restructuring and integrated rural development in Estonia.13 (1), 93-112.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Vervloet, J. A. J. (1984).Wageningen: Pudoc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Vos, W. & Meekes, H. (1999). Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future.46(1-3), 3-14. Doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Vuorela, N., Alho, P. & Kalliola, R. (2002). Systematic assessment of maps as source information in landscape-change research.27 (2), 141-166.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Widgren, M. (2004). Can landscapes be read? In: Palang, H., Sooväli, H. Antrop, M. & Setten, G. (eds.)(pp. 455-465). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Young, C. & Light, D. (2001). Place, national identity and post-socialist transformations: an introduction.20(8), 941-955. Doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00039-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-010-0001-9 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Estonian, Latvian
Page range: 1 - 12
Published on: Sep 27, 2010
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Post-communist countries,
transition,
socio-economic formation,
European Union (EU),
rural landscapes
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2010 Anu Printsmann, Hannes Palang, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 2 (2010): Issue 1 (March 2010)
Next article