Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hostes Humani Generis: Cyberspace, the Sea, and Sovereign Control Cover

Hostes Humani Generis: Cyberspace, the Sea, and Sovereign Control

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Volume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Feb 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Armitage, David. “The Elephant and the Whale: Empires of Land and Sea.”9 (1) (2007): 23-36.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Banner, Stuart.Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2008.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Blau, John. “Battle Brewing over International Internet Regulation.”(December 2012) // http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/internet/battle-brewing-over-internationalinternet- regulation (accessed December 14, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Bodini, Stefano Piedimonte. “Fighting Maritime Piracy under the European Convention on Human Rights.”22 (3) (2011): 829-848.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Brenner, Susan W., and Marc D. Goodman. “The Emerging Consensus on Criminal Conduct in Cyberspace.”10 (2) (2002): 139-223.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Burgess, Douglas R. “Hostis Humani Generi: Piracy, Terrorism and a New International Law.”13 (2006): 293-341.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Cade, Nicholas W. “An Adaptive Approach for an Evolving Crime: The Case for an International Cyber Court and Penal Code.”37 (3) (2012): 1139-1175.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Caral, Jose MA. Emmanuel. “Lessons from ICANN: Is the Self-regulation of the Internet Fundamentally Flawed?”12 (1) (2004): 1-31.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Cerf, Vinton, Barry M. Leiner, David C. Clark,. “A Brief History of the Internet”,(1997) // http://www.isoc.org/oti/printversions/0797prleiner.html (accessed December 17, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Chik, Warren B. “‘Customary Internet-tional Law’: Creating a Body of Customary Law to Cyberspace. Part 1: Developing Rules for Transitioning Custom into Law.”26 (2010): 3-44.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Clough, Jonathan. “Cybercrime.”37 (4) (2011): 671-680.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Clough, Jonathan. “Data Theft? Cybercrime and the Increasing Criminalization of Access to Data.”22 (1) (2011): 145-170.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Connery, Christopher L. “Ideologies of Land and Sea: Alfred Thayer Mahan, Carl Schmitt, and the Shaping of Global Myth.”28 (2) (2001): 173-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. De Leon, Pablo Mendes. “The Dynamics of Sovereignty and jurisdiction in International Aviation Law”: 483-496. In: Gerard Kreijen, ed.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Dean, Mitchell. “Nomos: Word and Myth”: 242-258. In: Louiza Odysseos and Fabio Petito, eds.Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Dunlap, Charles J. “Towards a Cyberspace Legal Regime in the Twenty-First Century: Considerations for American Cyber-Warriors.”87 (2008-2009): 712-724.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Frazzetto, Mark. “A Maritime Model for Cyberspace Legal Governance.”(September 19, 2011) // http://nationalstrategy.wordpress.com/ (accessed November 4, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Geiß, Robin, and Anna Petrig.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Ghosh, Sumit, and Elliot Turrini.eidelberg: Springer, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Grabosky, Peter. “The Global Dimension of Cybercrime.”6 (1) 2004: 146-157.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Greenleaf, Graham. “Regulating Cyberspace: Architecture vs Law?”21 (2) (1998): 593-604.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Grewe, Wilhelm G.Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Guilfoyle, Douglas. “Piracy off Somalia: UN Security Council Resolution 1816 and IMO Regional Counter-Piracy Efforts.”57 (2) (2008): 690-699.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Harris, Alexandra and Ray Harris. “The Need for Air Space and Outer Space Demarcation.”22 (2006): 3-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Hartogh, Den, and Cees Maris. “The Commencement of Modern Age”: 91-110. In: Cees Maris and Frans Jacobs, eds.Heidelberg; Springer, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Illves, Toomas Hendrik. “It‘s the Economy, Stupid!”(September 2012): 24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. “Internet Regulation: A Digital Cold War?”(December 14, 2012) // http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/12/internetregulation (accessed December 14, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Jarvie, Natasha. “Control of Cybercrime - Is an End to Our Privacy on the Internet a Price Worth Paying? Part 1.”9 (3) (2003): 76-81.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Jarvie, Natasha. “Control of Cybercrime - Is an End to Our Privacy on the Internet a Price Worth Paying? Part 2.”9 (4) (2003): 110-115.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Johnson, David and David Post. “Law and Borders - The Rise of Law in Cyberspace.”48 (1996): 1367-1402.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. “Joint Publication 1-02” (2001) // http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf (accessed November 4, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Judy, Henry L., and David Satola. “Business Interests Under Attack in Cyberspace: Is International Regulation the Right Response?”(December 2011) // http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/blt/content/2011/12/article-2-judysatola.shtml (accessed November 4, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Kadens, Emily. “The Myth of the Customary Law Merchant.”90 (5) (2012): 1153-1206.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Kempe, Michael. “Beyond the Law. The Image of Piracy in the Legal Writings of Hugo Grotius”: 379-395. In: Hans W Blom, ed.Leiden: Brill, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Khalid, Nazery. “With a Little Help from My Friends: Maritime Capacity building Measures in the Straits of Malacca.”31 (3) (2009): 424-446.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Klein, Natalie.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Kleinwachter, Wolfgang. “Internet Governance Outlook 2012: Cold War or Constructive Dialogue.”17 (1) (2012): 14-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Klimburg, Alexander. “Mobilising Cyber Power.”53 (1) (2011): 41-60.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Koops, Bert-Jaap. “The Internet and its Opportunities for Cybercrime”: 735-754. In: M Herzog-Evans, ed.. Nijmegen: Wold Legal Publishers, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Lessig, Lawrence. “The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach.”113 (1999): 501-546.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Libicki, Martin C.Santa Monica, Arlington, and Pittsburgh: The RAND Corporation, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Maier, Bernhard. “How Has the Law Attempted to Tackle the Borderless Nature of the Internet?”18 (2) (2010): 142-175.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Marder, Michael.New York and London: Continuum, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Mayer, Franz C. “The Internet and Public International Law - Worlds Apart?”12 (3) (2001): 612-622.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Menthe, Darrel C. “Jurisdiction In Cyberspace: A Theory of International Spaces.”4 (1998): 69-103.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Newman, David. “Contemporary Research Agenda in Border Studies: An Overview”: 33-48. In: Doris Wastl-Walter, ed.Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 47. O’Donnovan, Oliver, and Joan Lockwood O’Donnovan. “Isidore of Seville”: 204-206. In: Oliver O’Donnovan and Joan Lockwood O’Donnovan, eds.. Grand Rapids and Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Odysseos, Louiza, and Fabio Petito. “The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt”: 1-18. In: Louiza Odysseos and Fabio Petito, eds.Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Orji, Uchenna Jerome. “An Analysis of China’s Regulatory Response to Cybersecurity.”18 (7) (2012): 212-226.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Pardo, Arvid. “The Law of the Sea: Its Past and its Future.”63 (1) (1984): 7-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 51. Reed, Chris. “Online and Offline Equivalence: Aspiration and Achievement.”18 (3) (2010): 248-273.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. 52. Ronzitti, Natalino. “The Use of Private Contractors in the Fight against Piracy: Policy Options”: 37-53. In: Francesco Francioni and Natalino Ronzitti, eds.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 53. “Russia Calls for Internet Revolution.”(May 28, 2012) // http://www.rt.com/news/itu-internet-revolution-russia-386 (accessed November 4, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. 54. Schmitt, Carl.New York: Telos, 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. 55. Scott, Jennifer. “ITU Internet Regulation Blocked by UK and US.”(December 14, 2012) // http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240174668/ITU-regulation-blockedby- UK-and-US (accessed December 14, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. 56. Stahl, William M. “The Uncharted Waters of the Cyberspace: Applying the Principles of International Maritime Law to the Problem of Cybersecurity.”40 (2011): 247-273.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. 57. Touloumis, Tara. “Buccaneers and Bucks from the Internet: Pirate Bay and the Entertainment Industry.”19 (2009): 253-281.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. 58. Treves, Tullio. “Piracy, Law of the Sea, and Use of Force: Developments off the Coast of Somalia.”20 (2) (2009): 399-414.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. 59. US Department of State. “Fast Facts on United States Submitting Initial Proposals to World Telecom Conference” (August 1, 2012) // http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/fs/2012/195921.htm (accessed November 4, 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. 60. Wang, James C. F.Westport: Greenwood Press, 1992.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. 61. Webb, Walter Prescott.Reno: University of Nevada Press, 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. 62. Williams, Alison J. “A Crisis in Aerial Sovereignty? Considering the Implications of Recent Military Violations of National Airspace.”42 (1) (2010): 51-59.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. 63. Williams, Alison J. “Blurring Boundaries / Sharpening Borders: Analysing the US’s Use of Military Aviation Technologies to Secure International Borders, 2001-2008”: 283-300. In: Doris Wastl-Walter, ed.Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. 64. Yar, Majid. “The Novelty of ‘Cybercrime’: An Assessment in Light of Routine Activity Theory.”2 (2005): 407-427.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  65. 65. Zekos, Georgios I. “Globalisation and States’ Cyber- Territory.”5 (2001) [pagination not available].
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. 66. Zhou, Chenfeng Vincent, Christopher Leckie, and Shanika Karunasekera. “A Survey of Coordinated Attacks and Collaborative Intrusion Detection.”19 (2010): 124-140.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  67. 1. I.C.J. Reports 1951, 116.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. 2. Council of Europe. CETS no. 185 (Budapest; November 23, 2001).
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. 3. European Court of Justice. Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalon (March 29, 2011).
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. 4. Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (The County Court of Paris). Interim Court Order (November 20, 2000). Electronic Business Law Reports 1(3) (2001): 110-120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. 5. ECHR Grand Chamber. Application no. 3394/03 (March 29, 2010).
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. 6. United Nations Security Council. Resolution no.
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. 1816. UN Docs. S/RES/1816 (2008).
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. 7. The Council and the Committee of the Regions. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament. COM/2007/0267 Final. {SEC(2007) 641} {SEC(2007) 642}.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076-012-0014-y | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 132 - 163
Published on: Feb 8, 2013
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Cyberspace,
cybercrime,
sovereignty,
regulation,
cyber law,
law of the sea
Related subjects:
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Political science,
Political science, other

© 2013 Julija Kalpokienė, Ignas Kalpokas, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
Previous article
Next article