On the Potential to Apply De Minimis Exemption for Agreements Containing Hardcore Restraints: European Union Practice
By: Andrius Puksas
Open Access
|Jul 2012References
- Comision Nacional de la Competencia //
- "Beware of legal privilege?! Dutchexemption for hardcore infringements in line with EU law."(February 2011) //
- Drexl, Josef, Laurence Idot, and Joel Maneger.Academic Society for Competition Law (ASCOLA). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2009.
- No. 18 (December 2009) //
- Jones, Alison, and Brenda Sufrin.Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
- Jones, Alison. "The Journey Toward an Effects-based Approach under Article 101 TFEU-The Case of Hardcore Restraints."Vol. 55, No. 4 (Winter 2010): 783-818.
- Kalbfleisch, Pieter. "Crisis geen vrijbrief voor verboden afspraken" [Crisis is no Excuse for Illegal Agreements].(January 28, 2009) //
- Kjølbye, Lars. "Escaping Effects Analysis: The Commission's New Approach to Restrictions by Object."(2011 (1)).
- Linsmeier, Petra, and Moritz Lichtenegger. "The German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf holds that hardcore restrictions are not per se appreciable if the relevant market share is below 1% (Tschechisches Bier)."No. 21232 (June 23, 2004) // www.concurrences.com (accessed June 10, 2011).
- Ritter, Lennart, and David W. Braun.Third Edition. Kluwer Law International, 2004.
- Švirinas, Daivis. "The Peculiarities of the Assessment of the Use of Recommended Resale Prices under Article 81 of the European Community Treaty."No. 1(5) (2010): 219-236.
- Van Bael & Bellis.Kluwer Law International, 2005.
- Verras, Nikolaos. "Developments in Vertical Agreements."Vol. 55, No. 4 (Winter 2010): 843-874.
- Verras, Nikolaos. "Resale Price Maintenance in E.U. Competition Law: Thoughts in Relation to the Vertical Restraints Review Procedure."37 (2009) // http://www.cjel.net/online/16_1-verras/ (accessed June 10, 2011).
- Whish, Richard.Sixth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
- European Commission. Official Gazette, 2011, no. C 11/01.
- European Court of Justice, 2008, no. C-209/07.
- Official Gazette, 2008, no. C 115/47.
- The Court of First Instance, 1998, Case T-374/94.
- European Court of Justice, 2006, no. C-551/03.
- European Commission. Official Gazette, 2010, no. C 130/01.
- Audiencia Nacional [National Court of the Kingdom of Spain], 2009, no. 418/2008.
- European Court of Justice, 1972, no. 48/69.
- 1997 [with amendments which entered into force after July 1, 2009] //
- Official Gazette, 1999, no. 30-856.
- Comision Nacional de la Competencia [National Competition Commission of the Kingdom of Spain], 2008, no. 634/07.
- European Commission. Official Gazette, 2001, no. 368/07.
- European Commission. Official Gazette, 1997, no. 372/03.
- European Council. Official Gazette, 2003, no. L 1.
- European Commission. Official Gazette, 2004, no. L 123.
- Competition Council of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 19-487.
- Competition Council of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2004, no. 181-6732.
- Competition Council of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2011, no. 39(1)-353.
- European Court of Justice, 2009, no. 8/108.
- European Court of Justice, 1969, no. 5/69.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10076-012-0003-1 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Language: English
Page range: 46 - 69
Published on: Jul 28, 2012
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2012 Andrius Puksas, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.