Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Exploratory Study of the Perception of Ingroup Communication Relative to Social Representation Objects Cover

An Exploratory Study of the Perception of Ingroup Communication Relative to Social Representation Objects

Open Access
|Dec 2012

References

  1. Abric, J.-C. (1994). L’organisation interne des representations sociales: Systeme central et systeme peripherique. In C. Guimelli (Ed.),(73-84). Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestle.
  2. Abric, J.-C. & Tafani, E. (1995). Nature et fonctionnement du noyau central d’une representation sociale: La representation de l’entreprise., 28, 22-31l.
  3. Doise, W. (1989). Cognitions e representations sociales: L’approche genetique. In D. Jodelet (Ed.),. (pp. 341-362). Paris: PUF.
  4. Flament, C., Guimelli, C., & Abric, J.-C. (2006). Effets de masquage dans l’expression d’une representation sociale., 69, 15-31.
  5. Flament, C. & Rouquette, M.-L. (2003).. Paris: Armand Colin.
  6. Guimelli, C. & Deschamps, J.-C. (2000). Effets de contexte sur la production d’associations verbales : le cas des representations sociales des Gitans., 47-48, 44-54.
  7. Jodelet, D. (1989). Representations sociales: un domaine en expansion. In D. Jodelet (Ed.).(pp. 31-61). Paris: PUF.
  8. Lheureux, F., Rateau, P., & Guimelli, C. (2008). Hierarchie structurale, condionnalite et normativite des representations sociales., 77, 41-55.
  9. Milland, L. (2002). Pour une approche de la dynamique du rapport entre representations sociales du travail et du chomage., 15 (2), 27-55.
  10. Moliner, P. (1989). Validation experimentale de l’hypothese du noyau central des representations sociales., 41 (387), 759-762.
  11. Moliner, P. (1993). Cinq questions a propos des representations sociales., 20, 5-52.
  12. Moliner, P. (1995). A two-dimensional model of social representations., 25 (1), 27-40.
  13. Moliner, P. (2001a). Formation et stabilisation des representations sociales. In P. Moliner (Ed.),(pp. 15-41). Grenoble: PUG.
  14. Moliner, P. (2001b). Consensus manifestes, consensus latents et consensus illusoires., 49, 114-122.
  15. Moscovici, S. (1976).. Paris: PUF.
  16. Moscovici, S. (1984). Introduction: Le domaine de la psychologie sociale. In S. Moscovici (Ed.),(pp. 5-20). Paris: PUF.
  17. Mugny, G., Souchet, L., Quiamzade, A., & Codaccioni, C. (2009). Processus d’influence sociale et representations sociales. In P. Rateau & P. Moliner (Eds.),(pp. 123-149). Rennes: PUR.
  18. Rouquette, M.-L. (1996).. Paris: Dunod.
  19. Rouquette, M.-L. & Rateau, P. (1998).. Grenoble: PUG.
  20. Sa, C.P. (1998).. Rio de Janeiro: UERJ.
  21. Tafani, E. (2001). Attitudes, engagements et dynamique des representations sociales: Etudes experimentales., 14 (1), 7-29.
  22. Wachelke, J. (2012). Social representations: A review of theory and research from the structural approach., 11 (3), 729-741.
  23. Wagner, W. (1994). Fields of research and socio-genesis of social representations: A discussion of criteria and diagnostics., 33 (2), 199-228.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0014-8 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 211
Published on: Dec 21, 2012
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Joao Wachelke, Aline Demantova, Luciane Guisso, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.