Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diffusion of Linguistic Innovation as Social Coordination Cover

Diffusion of Linguistic Innovation as Social Coordination

Open Access
|Dec 2012

References

  1. Altmann, E.G., Pierrehumbert, J.B., & Motter, A.E. (2011). Niche as a determinant of word fate in online groups. PLoS ONE, 6 (5): e19009.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Benson, P. (2010). SLA after YouTube: New literacies and new language learning. Inv. talk, Univ. Warsaw.
  3. Blank, A. & Solomon, S. (2000). Power laws in cities population, financial markets and internet sites: Scaling and systems with a variable number of components. Physica A, 287, 279-288.10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00464-7
  4. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1 (1), 238-266.
  5. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. New York: Oxford University Press. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., & Newman, M.E.J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51 (4), 661-703.
  6. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Davies, J. (2007). Display, identity and the everyday: Self-presentation through digital image sharing. Discourse, Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28 (4), 549-564.10.1080/01596300701625305
  8. Dennett, D.C. (1990). Memes and the Exploitation of Imagination. Journal of Aes­thetics and Art Criticism, 48 (2), 127-135.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac48.2.0127
  9. Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation. Quarterly Journal of Eco­nomics, 114, 739-67.10.1162/003355399556133
  10. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités économiques. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
  11. Gladwell, M. (2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker, October 4, 2010.
  12. Global Language Monitor (2009). Death of Michael Jackson. Retrieved from: <http://www.languagemonitor.com/news/death-of-michael-jackson/>
  13. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 83 (6), 1420-1443.10.1086/226707
  14. Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2002). On modeling cognition and culture: Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2(2), 87-112.10.1163/156853702320281836
  15. Newman, M.E.J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contem­porary Physics, 46 (5), 323-351.10.1080/00107510500052444
  16. O’Dell, J. (2010). Does online buzz mean better TV ratings? Retrieved from: <http://mashable.com/2010/06/24/neilsen-vs-social-media/>
  17. Paradowski, M.B. (2009). Applying a complexity science approach to analysing and modelling language phenomena. Invited lecture, Higher English Language Seminar, Dept English, Stockholm Univ.
  18. Paradowski, M.B. & Jonak, L. (2012). Understanding the social cascading of geek­speak and the upshots for social cognitive systems. In A. Galton & Z. Wood (Eds.), Understanding and modelling collective phenomena (pp. 27-32). AISB/ IACAP World Congress, 2-6 July 2012, Birmingham, UK.
  19. Paradowski, M.B., Jonak, L., & Kuscsik, Z. (2010). Tracking the diffusion of lexical innovation in online social networks. Workshop on Data-Driven Dynamical Networks, l’Ecole de Physique des Houches.
  20. Project for Excellence in Journalism (2010). New media, old media. How Blogs and Social Media Agendas Relate and Differ from Traditional Press. Retrieved from: <http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/new_media_old_media>
  21. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
  22. Sornette, D. & Cont, R. (1997). Convergent multiplicative processes repelled from zero: Power laws and truncated power laws. Journal of Physics I, 7 (3), 431-444.10.1051/jp1:1997169
  23. Sperber, D. (2000). An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In R. Aunger (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science (pp. 163-173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Tabor, W. & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2001). Dynamical systems for sentence processing. In M.H. Christiansen & N. Chater (Eds.), Connectionistpsycholinguistics (pp. 177­211). Westport, CT: Ablex. de Tarde, G. (1890). Les lois de limitation: etude sociologique. Paris: Felix Alcan.
  25. The “Five Graces Group”, Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (Suppl. 1), 1-26.
  26. Valente, T.W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press.
  27. Van Geert, P. (2009). A comprehensive dynamic systems theory of language devel­opment. In K. De Bot & R.W. Schrauf (Eds.), Language development over the life span (pp. 60-104). New York/London: Routledge.
  28. Vander Wal, Th. (2007, Feb 2). Folksonomy coinage and definition. Retrieved from: <http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html>
  29. Watts, D.J. (2007). The accidental influentials. Harvard Business Review, 85 (2), 22-23.
  30. Winters, M.E., Tissari, H., & Allan, K. (2010). Historical cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226447
  31. Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0010-z | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 131 - 142
Published on: Dec 28, 2012
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2012 Michał B. Paradowski, Łukasz Jonak, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.