Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Types of Integration in a Theory of Language Cover

Types of Integration in a Theory of Language

Psychology of Language and Communication
Volume 16 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2012
References

References

  1. Altmann, E.G., Pierrehumbert, J.B., Motter, A.E. (2011). Niche as a determinant of word fate in online groups.6 (5), e19009.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist environment.27, 79-97.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Berkum, J.J.A. van (2008). Understanding sentences in context: What brain waves can tell us.17 (6), 376-380.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Boski, P. & Iben Youssef, K. (2012). Consequences of linguistic frame switching: Cognitive and motivational shifts in bilingual Tunisians., 16 (2), 65-85.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Bybee, J. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phoneti­cally conditioned sound change.14, 261-290.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Cangelosi, A. (2010). Grounding language in action and perception: From cognitive agents to humanoid robots.7 (2), 139-151.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (2011). Language and other cognitive systems. What is special about language?7, 263-278.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Cohn, M.A., Mehl, M.R., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychologi­cal change surrounding September 11, 2001.15, 687-693.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Cowley, S.J. (2004). Contextualizing bodies: How human responsiveness constrains distributed cognition., 26, 565-591.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Di Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M., & Iizuka, H. (2008). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing.26, 278-294.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction.5 (8), e12166.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L.L., & Swoboda, N. (2010). The interactive evolution of human communication systems.34, 351-386.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Fusaroli, R. & Tylén, K. (2012). Carving Language for Social Interaction: a dynamic approach.13 (1), 103-123.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human commu­nication systems., 29 (5), 737-767.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Galantucci, B. & Garrod, S. (2011). Experimental semiotics: A review.5:11. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00011
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Gleason, J.B. & Ratner, N.B. (1997).2nd edition. New York: Har- court Brace.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Hodges, B.H. (2007). Values define fields: The intentional dynamics of driving, car­rying, leading, negotiating, and conversing.19, 153-178.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human lan­guage.105 (31), 10681-10686.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Kirby, S., Christiansen, M., & Chater, N. (2009). Syntax as an adaptation to the learner. In D. Bickerton & E. Szathmáry (Eds.),(pp. 325-343). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kutas, M. & Federmeier, K.D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP).62, 621-647.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Leonardi, G. (2012). The study of language and conversation with recurrence analysis methods.16 (2), 87-105.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Loreto, V. & Steels, L. (2007). Social dynamics: Emergence of language.3, 758-760.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of linguistic form in time.17 (3-4), 191-211.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. McFarland, D.H. (2001). Respiratory markers of conversational interaction.44, 128-143.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Nomikou, I., Szufnarowska, J., & Rohlfing, K. J. (submitted). Educating attention: Recruiting, maintaining and framing eye-contact in early natural mother-infant interactions.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Paradowski, M. & Jonak, L. (2012). Diffusion of linguistic innovation as social co­ordination.16 (2), 53-64.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Pattee, H.H. (1969). How does a molecule become a message?3, 1-16.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Pattee, H.H. (1982). Cell psychology: An evolutionary approach to the symbol-matter problem., 5 (4), 325-341.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Pattee, H.H. (1987) Instabilities and information in biological self-organization. In F.E. Yates (Ed.),(pp. 325-338). New York: Plenum.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Pickering, M.J. & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue., 27, 169-225.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Pickering, M.J. & Garrod, S. (in press). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension..
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Polanyi, M. (1968). Life’s irreducible structure.160, 1308-1312.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Ra̹czaszek-Leonardi, J. (2009). Symbols as constraints: the structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language.17 (3), 653-676.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Ra̹czaszek-Leonardi, J. (2010). Multiple time-scales of language dynamics: An ex­ample from psycholinguistics., 22, 4, 269-285.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Ra̹czaszek-Leonardi, J. (in press). Language as a system of replicable constraints. In H.H. Pattee, J. Ra̹czaszek-Leonardi (Eds.),Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Ra̹czaszek-Leonardi, J. & Cowley, S.J. (2012). The evolution of language as controlled collectivity., 13 (1), 1-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Ra̹czaszek-Leonardi, J. & Kelso, J.A.S. (2008) Reconciling symbolic and dynamic aspects of language: Toward a dynamic psycholinguistics.26, 193-207.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, S., & Winters, J. (2012). Social structure and language structure: The new nomothetic approach.16 (2), 11-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Schegloff, E.A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interac­tion. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.),(pp. 52-133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Shockley, K., Santana, M.-V., & Fowler, C.A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation.29 (2), 326-332.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Sinha, C. (2009). Language as biocultural niche and social institution. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.),(pp. 289-310). Am­sterdam: John Benjamins.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Smith, K., Brighton, H., & Kirby, S. (2002). Language evolution in a multi-agent model: The cultural emergence of compositional structure. Retrieved from: .isrl.illinois.edu/ junwang4/langev/localcopy/pdf/smith02languageEvolution.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Smith, K., Brighton, H., & Kirby, S. (2003). Complex systems in language evolu­tion: The cultural emergence of compositional structure.6, 537-558.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Steels, L. (2006). Experiments on the emergence of human communication.10, 347-349.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Steels, L. (2011). Modeling the cultural evolution of language.8, 339-356.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Steels, L. & Belpaeme, T. (2005). Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour.28, 469-489.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Tabor, W. (1994). Syntactic innovation: A connectionist model. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Tabor, W. (1995). Lexical change as nonlinear interpolation. In J.D. Moore & J.F. Lehman (Eds.),(pp. 242-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G.C., & Kelso, J.A.S. (2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination.104, 8190-8195.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Trevarthen, C. & Aitken, K.J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory and clinical application.42 (1), 3-48.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Trevarthen, C. & Daniel, S. (2005). Disorganized rhythm and synchrony: Early signs of autism and Rett syndrome.27, 25-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Turing, A.M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis.237, 37-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Tylen, K., Fusaroli, R. & Raczaszek-Leonardi, J. (in press). Dialogue as interpersonal synergy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Wacewicz, S. & Żywiczyński, P. (2012). Human Honest Signalling and Nonverbal Communication.16 (2), 32-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Wygotski, L.S. (1930/2006).Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. English translation: Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.),Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994. Available at: vygotsky/works/1934/tool-symbol.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Zinken, J. (2008). The metaphor of ‘linguistic relativity’., 10 (2), 1-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Zinken, J., Ogiermann, E. (2011). How to propose an action as objectively necessary: The case of Polish(‘one has to x’)., 44 (3), 263-287.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0007-7 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 88
Published on: Dec 28, 2012
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
theory of language,
computer simulation,
language as coordination
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Psychology,
Applied psychology

© 2012 Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 16 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
Next article