Perception, Processing and Storage of Subphonemic and Extralinguistic Features in Spoken Word Recognition - An Argument from Language Variation and Change
Open Access
|Jul 2012
References
- Andruski, J. E., Blumstein, S. E. & Burton, M. (1994). The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access., 52, 163-87.
- Chen, M. Y. & Wang, W. S-Y. (1975). Sound change: actuation and implementation., 51, 255-292.
- Chomsky, N. (1965).Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968).New York: Harper & Row.
- Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A. & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed., 13 (3), 361-377.
- Gaskell, M. G. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception., 12, 613-656.
- Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access., 105, 251-279.
- Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B. & Logan, D. B. (1991). The nature of talker variability effect on recall of spoken word lists., 17, 152-162.
- Halle, M. (1985). Speculation about the representation of words in memory. In V. Fromkin (Ed.)(pp. 101-114). New York: Academic Press.
- Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: an exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.),(pp. 145-166). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Johnson, K. (2005). Speaker normalization in speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.),(pp. 363-389). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Joos, M. A. (1948). Acoustic phonetics., 24, supplement 2, 1-136.
- Jusczyk, P. W. (1993). From language general to language specific capacities. The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops., 21, 3-28.
- Labov, W. (1972).Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Labov, W. (1981). Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy., 57, 267-308.
- Labov, W. (1994).Oxford: Blackwell.
- Labov, W. (2001).Oxford: Blackwell.
- Labov, W., Yaeger, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). [LYS]Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.
- Leach, E. (1998).3rd edn. Translated by Piotr Niklewicz. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
- Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. & Cooper, F. S. (1954). The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of stop and nasal consonants., 68, 1-13.
- Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory revisited., 21, 1-36.
- Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T. & Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood, activation, and PARSYN., 62, 615-625.
- Luce, P. A. & McLennan, C. T. (2005). Spoken word recognition: the challenge of variation. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.),(pp. 591-609). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Lyons, J. (1998).3rd edn. Translated by Barbara Stanosz. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka
- McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception., 10, 1-86.
- Mullennix, J. W. & Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception., 47, 379-390.
- Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B. & Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition., 85, 365-378.
- Nygaard, L. C. (2005). Perceptual integration of linguistic and nonlinguistic properties of speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.),(pp. 390-413). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S. & Pisoni, D. B. (1992). Effects of speaking rate and talker variability on the representation of spoken words in memory., (pp. 209-212). Banff, Canada.
- Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S. & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process., 5, 42-46.
- Paul, H. ([1880] 1891).Translated by H. A. Strong from the 2ed. (1886) ofHalle: Max Niemeyer.
- Paul, H. ([1880] 1978). On sound change. In P. Baldi & R. N. Werth (Eds.)(pp. 3-22). University Park Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Long-term memory in speech perception: some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning., 13, 109-125.
- Pisoni, D. B. (1997). Some thoughts on "normalization" in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.)(pp. 9-32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Pisoni, D. B. & Levi, S. V. (2007). Representations and representational specificity in speech perception and spoken word recognition. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.),(pp. 3-18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Port, R. & Leary, A. (2005). Against formal phonology., 81, 927-964.
- Saussure, F. de (1959).Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Saussure, F. de (1991).2nd edn. Translated by Krystyna Kasprzyk. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
- Stevens, K. N. (2005). Features in speech perception and lexical access. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.),(pp. 125-155). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Studdert- Kennedy, M. (1976). Speech perception. In N. J. Lass (Ed.)(pp. 243-293). New York: Academic Press.
- Twaddell, W. F. (1952). Phonemes and allophones in speech analysis., 24, 607-611.
- Wang, W. S. Y. (1978). Competing changes as a cause of residue. In P. Baldi & R. N. Werth (Eds.),(pp. 236-259). University Park Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.),(pp. 95-195). Austin: University of Texas Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0001-0 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 19
Published on: Jul 2, 2012
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2012 Elżbieta Łukasiewicz, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.